Climatic Change

, Volume 112, Issue 3–4, pp 585–599 | Cite as

Climate warming and natural disaster management: An exploration of the issues

Article

Abstract

This paper explores two issues that have been receiving increasing attention in recent decades, climate change adaptation and natural disaster risk reduction. An examination of the similarities and differences between them reveals important linkages but also significant differences, including the spectrum of threats, time and spatial scales, the importance of local versus global processes, how risks are perceived, and degree of uncertainty. Using a risk perspective to analyze these issues, preferential strategies emerge related to choices of being proactive, reactive, or emphasizing risk management as opposed to the precautionary principle. The policy implications of this analysis are then explored, using Canada as a case study.

Supplementary material

10584_2011_259_MOESM1_ESM.doc (230 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 230 kb)

References

  1. Adams J (1999) Cars, cholera, and cows: the management of risk and uncertainty. Retrieved from http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-335es.html
  2. Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conserv Ecol 5(2):18, Online: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art18/
  3. Burton, I. (1997). ‘Vulnerability and Adaptive Responses in the Context of Climate Change’, Climatic Change, Volume 36, Number 1-2, 185–196Google Scholar
  4. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) (2010) ‘Inuit win injunction on seismic testing’, CBC News, August 8, 2010, Accessed on: August 10, 2010, Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2010/08/08/nunavut-lancaster-injunction.html?ref=rss
  5. Commoner B (1971) The closing circle: nature, man, and technology. New York: Knopf. Canada. Department of Justice. Laws. Retrieved from http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/
  6. Davies M, Guenther B, Leavy J, Mitchell T, Tanner T (2009) Climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction and social protection: complementary roles in agriculture and rural growth. IDS Working Papers 2009:01–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eakin H, Lemos MC (2010) Institutions and change: the challenge of building adaptive capacity in Latin America. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etkin D (2009) Patterns of risk: spatial planning as a strategy for the mitigation of risk from natural hazards. In: Fra Paleo U (ed) 2009. Building safer communities. Risk governance, spatial planning, and responses to natural hazards. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford J, MacDonald J, Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Vulnerability to climate change in Igloolik, Nunavut: what we can learn from the past and present. Polar Record 42(221):127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganzel B (2003) The dust bowl of the 1930s. Retrieved from http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/water_02.html
  11. Government of British Columbia (2008) Future forest initiative. Retrieved from http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hts/future_forests/FFEI_FAQs.pdf
  12. Government of Canada (2009) The Northern Strategy, http://www.northernstrategy.ca
  13. Green KC, Armstrong SJ (2007) Global warming: forecasts by scientists versus scientific forecasts. Energy Environ 18(7–8):997–1021Google Scholar
  14. Gunderson LHL, Holling CS (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen J (2008) The threat to the planet. Retrieved from http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~roban/lab_2006_fall/hansen.pdf
  16. Henry AJ (1930) The great drought of 1930 in the United States. Mon Weather Rev 58:351–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higuchi K, Yuen C-W, Shabbar A (2000) Ice storm in Southcentral Canada and Northeastern United States: a climatological perspective. Theor Appl Climatol 66:61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Hovden J (2004) Risk and uncertainty management strategies. Paper presented at the 6th International CRN Expert Workshop. Stockholm, 22–24Google Scholar
  20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007a) Climate change 2007—The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007b) Climate change 2007—Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group 2 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Karoly D, Risbey J, Reynolds A (2003) Global warming contributes to Australia’s worst drought. World Wildlife Federation Report, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristensen V, Aven T, Ford D (2006) A new perspective on Renn and Klinke’s approach to risk evaluation and management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mearns R, Norton A (eds) (2010) Social dimensions of climate change: equity and vulnerability in a warming word. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., p 320Google Scholar
  25. Mercer J (2010) Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: are we reinventing the wheel? J Int Dev 22:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Milligan J (2004) Heatwaves: the developed world’s hidden disaster. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent, World Disasters ReportGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell T, van Aalst M (2010) Convergence of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: a review for DFID 31st October 2008Google Scholar
  28. Mohajer A (1993) Seismicity and seismotectonics of the Western Lake Ontario region. Géographie physique et Quaternaire 47(3):353–362Google Scholar
  29. Moore AL, Michael A (2009) On valuing information in adaptive-management, models. Conserv Biol 24(4):984–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE) (2011) The economic risks and opportunities of climate change for Canada, Accessed on: October 1, 2011, Available at: http://nrtee-trnee.ca/climate/climate-prosperity
  31. Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) (2010) Completed screenings, Files 2007–2010Google Scholar
  32. Pielke R (2004) A broader perspective on climate change is needed. Global Change News Letter Number 59. Retrieved from http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/pdfs/NR-139.pdf
  33. Potgieter AB, Hammer GL, Meinke H, Stone RC, Goddard L (2005) Three putative types of el niño revealed by spatial variability in impact on australian wheat Yield. J Clim 18:1566–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paehlke R (2008) Some like it cold: the politics of climate change in Canada. Between the Lines, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  35. Pielke R, Wigley T, Green C (2008) Dangerous assumptions. Nature 452:531–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Renn A, Klinke O (2001) Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: classifying and managing risks. J Risk Res 4(2):159–173Google Scholar
  37. Rhodes V (2008) Climate should influence building code says expert. Retrieved August 30, 2009 from http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/story.html?id=ee7bf4c0-56a1-412e-a222-7feb8659aa94
  38. Risk Management Solutions, Inc (2008) The 1998 ice storm: 10-year retrospective. Special ReportGoogle Scholar
  39. Runco M, Pritzker SR (1999) Encyclopedia of creativity. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Salafsky N, Margoluis R, Redford K (2009) Adaptive management: A tool for conservation practitioners. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  41. Shaw R, Pulhin JM, Pereira JJ (2010) Chapter 1 Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: An Asian perspective. In Shaw R, Pulhin JM, Pereira JJ (eds) Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: an asian perspective (Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management, Volume 5), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 1–18Google Scholar
  42. Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  43. Stern Sir N (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. HM Treasury, Cabinet Office, Cambridge University Press. p 657Google Scholar
  44. Stuart-Menteth A (n.d.). U.K. Summer 2007 Floods. RMS. Retrieved April 12, 2010 from http://www.rms.com/Reports/UK_Summer_2007_Floods.pdf
  45. Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tearfund (2008) Linking climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  47. Union of Concerned Scientists (January 2007). Smoke, mirrors and hot air: How Exxon Mobil uses big tobacco’s tactics to manufacture uncertainty on climate science. Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  48. UN University (2009) Toward a Global Science and Technology Policy Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations University Policy Brief No. 4. Retrieved from http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/pb/unu_pb_2009_4.pdf
  49. Venton P, La Trobe S (2008) Linking climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  50. Van der Schrier G, Briffa KR, Osborn TJ, Cook ER (2006) Summer moisture availability across North America. J Geophys Res 111Google Scholar
  51. Williams BK, Szaro RC, Shapiro CD (2007) Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide. US Department of the InteriorGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Disaster and Emergency Management, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Political Science, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Environmental StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations