Climatic Change

, Volume 111, Issue 3–4, pp 581–607 | Cite as

Scales of perception: public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates

  • Darren Ruddell
  • Sharon L. Harlan
  • Susanne Grossman-Clarke
  • Gerardo Chowell


Understanding public perceptions of climate is critical for developing an effective strategy to mitigate the effects of human activity on the natural environment and reduce human vulnerability to the impacts of climate change. While recent climate assessments document change among various physical systems (e.g., increased temperature, sea level rise, shrinking glaciers), environmental perceptions are relatively under-researched despite the fact that there is growing skepticism and disconnect between climate science and public opinion. This study utilizes a socio-ecological research framework to investigate how public perceptions compared with environmental conditions in one urban center. Specifically, air temperature during an extreme heat event was examined as one characteristic of environmental conditions by relating simulations from the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) atmospheric model with self-reported perceptions of regional and neighborhood temperatures from a social survey of Phoenix, AZ (USA) metropolitan area residents. Results indicate that: 1) human exposure to high temperatures varies substantially throughout metropolitan Phoenix; 2) public perceptions of temperature are more strongly correlated with proximate environmental conditions than with distal conditions; and 3) perceptions of temperature are related to social characteristics and situational variables. The social constructionist paradigm explains public perceptions at the regional scale, while experience governs attitude formation at the neighborhood scale.


Heat Wave Extreme Heat Census Block Group Environmental Perception Temperature Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study is based upon research supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant Nos. DEB-0423704 Central Arizona - Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER), SES-0345945 Decision Center for a Desert City (DCDC), and GEO-0816168 Urban Vulnerability to Climate Change. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendation expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.


  1. Aitken SC, Cutter SL, Foote KE, Sell JL (1989) Environmental perception and behavioral geography. In: Gaile GL, Wilmott CJ (eds) Geography in America. Merrill, Colombus, pp 218–238Google Scholar
  2. Alley RB, Marotzke J, Nordhaus WD, Overpeck JT, Peteet DM, Pielke RA Jr, Pierrehumbert RT, Rhines PB, Stocker TF, Talley LD, Wallace JM (2003) Abrupt climate change. Science 299:2005–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, RE Witmer (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, U.S. Government Printing Office, 28ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol 23:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck U (1992) Risk society: toward a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bord RJ, Fisher A, O’Connor RE (1998) Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Clim Res 11:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borden K, Cutter S (2008) Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States. Int J Health Geogr 7:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Read D (1994) What do people know about global climate change? Part 1: mental models. Risk Anal 14:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman T (2008) Summary report: A meeting to assess public attitudes about climate change. Sponsored by NOAA, NASA, and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communications. NOAA, Silversprings, MDGoogle Scholar
  10. Brazel A, Selover N, Vose R, Heisler G (2000) The tale of two climates—Baltimore and Phoenix urban LTER sites. Climate Research 15:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brazel A, Gober P, Lee S-J, Grossman-Clarke S, Zehnder JA, Hedquist B, Comparri E (2007) Determinants of changes in the regional urban heat island in metropolitan Phoenix (Arizona, USA) between 1990 and 2004. Clim Res 33:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brody SD, Peck BM, Highfield WE (2004) Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: a spatial and statistical analysis. Risk Anal 24:1561–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40:72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown M (2000) Urban parameterizations for mesoscale meteorological models. In: Boybeyi Z (ed) Mesoscale atmospheric dispersion. WIT press, Ashurst Southampton England, pp 193–255Google Scholar
  15. Burt JE, Barber GM (1996) Elementary statistics for geographers. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Carey M (2010) In the shadow of melting glaciers: climate change and andean society. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. Census Bureau (2010) American community survey. Available at:
  18. (CDC) Centers for Disease Control (2000) Heat-related illnesses, deaths, and risk factors—Cincinnati and Dayton, Ohio, 1999 and United States, 1979–1997. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49:470–473Google Scholar
  19. (CDC) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Heat-related mortality—Arizona, 1993–2002 and United States, 1979–2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54:628–630Google Scholar
  20. Chen F, Janjic Z, Mitchell K (1997) Impact of the atmospheric surface-layer parameterizations in the new land-surface scheme of the NCEP mesoscale Eta model. Bound-Layer Meteor 85:391–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen F, Kusaka H, Bornstein R, Ching J, Grimmond CSB, Grossman-Clarke S, Loridan T, Manning KW, Martilli A, Miao S, Sailor D, Salamanca FP, Taha H, Tewari M, Wang X, Wyszogrodzki AA, Zhang C (2011) The integrated WRF/urban modeling system: development, evaluation, & applications to urban environmental problems. Int J Climatol 31:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Corral-Verdugo V, Bechtel RB, Frijo-Sing B (2003) Environmental beliefs and water conservation: an empirical study. J Environ Psychol 23:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dai A, Trenberth KE (2004) The diurnal cycle and its depiction in the community climate system model. J Clim 17:930–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diffenbaugh N, Pal J, Trapp R, Giorgi F (2005) Fine-scale processes regulate the response of extreme events to global climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15774–15778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dispensa JM, Brulle RJ (2003) Media’s social construction of environmental issues: focus on Global Warming—a comparative study. Int J Sociol Soc Pol 23:74–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunlap RE (1998) Lay perceptions of global risk. Int Sociol 13:473–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunlap RE, Catton WR Jr (1979) Environmental sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 5:243–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment 50:26–35Google Scholar
  30. Dunlap RE, Scarce R (1991) The polls-poll trends: environment problems and protection. Public Opin Q 55:651–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eberhart-Phillips JE, Saunders TM, Robinson AL, Hatch DL, Parrish RG (1994) Profile of mortality from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake using coroner and medical examiner reports. Disasters 18:160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ellis J, Galvin KA (1994) Climate patterns and land-use practices in the dry zones of Africa. Bioscience 44:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fernandez-Ballesteros R (ed) (2003) Environmental attitudes and values. Encyclopedia of psychological assessment, volume 1. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 364–369Google Scholar
  34. Fischhoff B (1985) Managing risk perceptions. Issues Sci Technol 2:83–96Google Scholar
  35. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2000) Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Galloway McLean K, Ramos-Castillo A, Gross T, Johnston S, Vierros M, Noa R (2009) Report of the Indigenous Peoples’ Global Summit on Climate Change: 20–24 April 2009. Anchorage, Alaska. United Nations University – Traditional Knowledge Initiative, Darwin, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. Garcia-Mira R, Real JE, Romay J (2005) Temporal and spatial dimensions in the perception of environmental problems: an investigation of the concept of environmental hyperopia. Int J Psychol 40:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Geller H (2003) Energy revolution: policies for a sustainable future. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Gimblett HR (2001) Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based modeling techniques for simulating social and ecological processes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Goudie A (2000) The human impact: on the natural environment. MIT Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  41. Gregory RS, Leiserowitz A, Failing L (2006) Climate change impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in Northwest Alaska. Available at SSRN:
  42. Grimm NB, Redman CL (2004) Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: the case of Central Arizona—Phoenix. Urban Ecosyst 7:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grossman-Clarke S, Zehnder JA, Stefanov WL, Liu Y, Zoldak MA (2005) Urban modifications in a mesoscale meteorological model and the effects on near surface variables in an arid metropolitan region. J Appl Meteorol 44:1281–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grossman-Clarke S, Stefanov WL, Zehnder JA (2010a) Urban weather, climate and air quality modeling: increasing resolution and accuracy using improved urban morphology. In: Yang X (ed) Urban remote sensing. Wiley-Blackwell. In press
  45. Grossman-Clarke S, Zehnder JA, Loridan T, Grimmond SCB (2010b) Contribution of land use changes to near surface air temperatures during recent summer extreme heat events in the phoenix metropolitan area. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:1649–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hamilton LC (2008) Who cares about Polar regions? Results from a survey of US public opinion. Arctic Antarct Alpine Res 40:671–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hardisty DJ, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2010) A dirty word or a dirty world? attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol Sci 21:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harlan SL, Brazel AJ, Prashad L, Stefanov WL, Larsen L (2006) Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress. Soc Sci Med 63:2847–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harlan SL, Budruk M, Gustafson A, Larson K, Ruddell D, Smith VK, Yabiku ST, Wutich A (2007) Phoenix Area Social Survey 2006 Highlights: Community and Environment in a Desert Metropolis. Central Arizona—Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Project, Contribution No. 4. Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  50. Harlan SL, Brazel A, Jenerette GD, Jones NS, Larsen L, Prashad L, Stefanov WL (2008) In the shade of affluence: the inequitable distribution of the urban heat island. Res Soc Probl Publ Pol 15:173–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hedquist BC, Brazel AJ (2004) Urban heat island (UHI) measures for the S.E. metropolitan area of the CAP LTER: transects versus fixed stations. Presented at the 6th Annual CAP LTER Poster Symposium, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  52. Hong SY, Dudhia J, Chen SH (2004) A revised approach to ice-microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of cloud and precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 132:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci India 100:8788–8792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (IPCC) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Report of Working Group II. United Nations Environment ProgramGoogle Scholar
  55. (IPCC) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Available at:, Accessed 12/20/08
  56. Janjic ZI (2002) Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor–Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Office Note, No. 437, pp 61Google Scholar
  57. Jenerette GD, Harlan SL, Brazel AJ, Jones N, Larsen L, Stefanov WL (2007) Regional relationships between vegetation, surface temperature, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 22:353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Johnson DP, Wilson JS, Luber GC (2009) Socioeconomic indicators of heat-related health risk supplemented with remotely sensed data. Int J Health Geogr 8:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jones JM (2010) Conservatives doubts about global warming grow. Available at, Accessed May 28, 2010, (March 11)
  60. Kain JS (2004) The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update. J Appl Meteorol 43:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kalkstein LS, Davis RE (1989) Weather and human mortality: an evaluation of demographic and inter-regional responses in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 79:44–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kalkstein LS, Green JS (1997) An evaluation of climate/mortality relationships in large U.S. cities and the possible impacts of a climate change. Environ Health Perspect 105:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Karl TR, Trenberth KE (2003) Modern global climate change. Science 302:1719–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Karl TR, Jones PD, Knight RW, Kukla G, Plummer N, Razuvayev V, Gallo KP, Lindseay J, Charlson RJ, Peterson TC (1993) A new perspective on recent global warming: asymmetric trends of daily maximum and minimum temperature. Am Meteorol Soc 74:1007–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Keeter S, Kennedy C, Dimock M, Best J, Craighill P (2006) Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD survey. Public Opin Q 70:759–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A (2008) Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal 28:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kempton W, Boster JS, Hartley JA (1995) Environmental values in american culture. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. Klinenberg E (2002) Heat wave: a social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  69. Kowalok ME (1993) Common threads: research lessons from acid rain, ozone depletion, and global warming. Environ 35:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser P (2006) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77:7–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kurz T (2002) The psychology of environmentally sustainable behavior: fitting together pieces of the puzzle. Ana Soc Iss Pub Pol 2:257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kusaka H, Kimura F (2004) Thermal effects of urban canyon structure on the nocturnal heat island: numerical experiment using a mesoscale model coupled with an urban canopy model. J Appl Meteorol 43:1899–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Leiserowitz AA (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25:1433–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Leiserowitz AA (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77:45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Leiserowitz AA, Maibach E, Roser-Renout C (2010) Global warming’s six Americas, January 2010. Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change, New Haven, CT. Available at
  76. List JA (2004) Young, selfish and male: field evidence of social preferences. Econ J 492:121–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NE, O’Connor RE (2005) Dangerous climate change: the role for risk research. Risk Anal 25:1387–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lowry W (1967) The climate of cities. Sci Am 217:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mainieri T, Barnett EG, Valdero TR, Unipan JB, Oskamp S (1997) Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. J Soc Psychol 137:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. (MCDPH) Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Division of Disease Control, Office of Epidemiology and Data Services (2008) Heat caused and heat related death occurrences in Maricopa County. (August 12). Phoenix, AZGoogle Scholar
  81. Martilli M (2007) Current research and future challenges in urban mesoscale modeling. Int J Climatol 27:1909–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Martin CA (2001) Landscape water use in Phoenix, Arizona. Desert Plants 17:26–31Google Scholar
  83. Martin CA, Peterson KA, Stabler LB (2003) Residential landscaping in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.: practices and preferences relative to covenants, codes, and restrictions. J Arboric 29:9–17Google Scholar
  84. Marx SM, Weber EU, Orlove BS, Leiserowitz A, Krantz DH, Roncoli C, Phillips J (2007) Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environ Change 17:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Masson V (2006) Urban surface modeling and the meso-scale impact of cities. Theor Appl Climatol 84:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McCormick S (2008) Hot or Not?: recognizing and preparing for climate-induced illness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA. Available at:
  87. McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S (2006) Climate change and human health: present and future risks. Lancet 367:859–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Meehl GA, Tebaldi C (2004) More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305:994–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mirchandani H, McDonald G, Hood I, Fonseca C (1996) Heat-related deaths in Philadelphia—1993. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 17:106–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102:16663–16682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Moran PA (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23Google Scholar
  92. Neter J, Wasserman W (1974) Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  93. Newport F (2010) (March 11) Americans’ global warming concerns continue to drop. Available at:, Accessed May 28, 2010
  94. (NOAA) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2006) US Natural Hazard Statistics. Available at, Accessed December 21, 2008
  95. Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and every day life. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  96. O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:461–471Google Scholar
  97. Ogbu JU (1993) Differences in cultural frames of reference. Int J Behav Dev 16:483–506Google Scholar
  98. Oke T (1978) Boundary layer climates. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 108:1–24Google Scholar
  100. Oke TR (1997) Part 4: the changing climatic environments: urban climates and global environmental change. In: Thompson RD, Perry A (eds) Applied climatology principals and practice. Routledge, London, pp 273–287Google Scholar
  101. O’Neill MS, Ebi K (2009) Temperature extremes and health: impacts of climate variability and change in the United States. J Occup Environ Med 51:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Read D, Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Smuts T (1994) What do people know about global climate change? Part 2: survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 14:971–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Reith J, Jorgensen HS, Pedersen PM, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Jeppensen LL, Olsen TS (1996) Body temperature in acute stroke: relation to stroke severity, infant size, mortality, and outcome. Lancet 347:422–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ruddell DM, Harlan SL, Grossman-Clarke S, Buyanteyev A (2010) Risk and exposure to extreme heat in microclimates of Phoenix, AZ. In: Showalter P, Lu Y (eds) Geospatial contributions to urban hazard and disaster analysis. Springer, New York, pp 179–202Google Scholar
  105. Sailor DJ, Lu L (2004) A top-down methodology for developing diurnal and seasonal anthropogenic heating profiles for urban areas. Atmos Environ 38:2737–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Seager R, Tang M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang H, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau N, Li C, Velez J, Naik N (2006) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Semenza JC, Rubin CH, Falter KH, Selanikio JD, Flanders WD, How HL, Wilhelm JL (1996) Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. Am J Prev Med 16:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sheridan SC, Kalkstein LS (2004) Progress in heat watch-warning system technology. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:1931–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sherif M (1936) The psychology of social norms. Harper, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  110. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2005) A description of the advanced research WRF version 2. NCAR Technical Note-468+STR, pp. 88Google Scholar
  111. Slovic P, Peters E (2006) Risk perception and affect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15:322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Souch C, Grimmond S (2006) Applied climatology: urban climate. Progr Phys Geogr 30:270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Stedman RC (2004) Risk and climate change: perceptions of key policy actors in Canada. Risk Anal 24:1395–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Stefanov WL, Ramsey MS, Christensen PR (2001) Monitoring urban land cover change: an expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Rem Sens Environ 77:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Taha H (1997) Urban climates and heat islands: albedo, evapotranspiration, and anthropogenic heat. Energ Build 25:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tuan Y-F (1990) Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Colombia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  117. Ungar S (1992) The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. Socio Q 33:483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Uzzell DL (2000) The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. J Environ Psychol 20:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Vandentorren S, Suzan F, Medina S, Pascal M, Maulpoix A, Cohen J-C (2004) Mortality in 13 French cities during the August 2003 heat wave. Am J Public Health 94:1518–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Voogt JA (2002) Urban Heat Island. In: Douglas I (ed) Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 660–666Google Scholar
  121. Weber EU (2006) Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change 77:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wilhelmi OV, Purvis KL, Harriss RC (2004) Designing a geospatial information infrastructure for mitigation of heat wave hazards in urban areas. Nat Hazards Rev 5:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Ye L, Zaval L, Johnson E (2011) Local warming: daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychol Sci 22:454–459Google Scholar
  124. Zahran S, Brody S, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2006) Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Resour 19:771–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren Ruddell
    • 1
  • Sharon L. Harlan
    • 2
  • Susanne Grossman-Clarke
    • 2
  • Gerardo Chowell
    • 2
  1. 1.Spatial Sciences InstituteUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityPhoenix metropolitan areaUSA

Personalised recommendations