Climatic Change

, Volume 110, Issue 3–4, pp 649–668 | Cite as

A simple model to account for regional inequalities in the effectiveness of solar radiation management

  • Juan B. Moreno-Cruz
  • Katharine L. Ricke
  • David W. Keith
Article

Abstract

We present a simple model to account for the potential effectiveness of solar radiation management (SRM) in compensating for anthropogenic climate change. This method provides a parsimonious way to account for regional inequality in the assessment of SRM effectiveness and allows policy and decision makers to examine the linear climate response to different SRM configurations. To illustrate how the model works, we use data from an ensemble of modeling experiments conducted with a general circulation model (GCM). We find that an SRM scheme optimized to restore population-weighted temperature changes to their baseline compensates for 99% of these changes while an SRM scheme optimized for population-weighted precipitation changes compensates for 97% of these changes. Hence, while inequalities in the effectiveness of SRM are important, they may not be as severe as it is often assumed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bala G, Caldeira K, Nemani R (2010) Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle. Clim Dyn 35(2–3):423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ban-Weiss GA, Caldeira K (2010) Geoengineering as an optimization problem. Environ Res Lett 5:034009, 9 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackstock JJ, Long JCS (2010) The politics of geoengineering. Science 327(5965):527. doi:10.1126/science.1183877. Accessed 29 January 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackstock J, Battisti DS, Caldeira K, Eardley DM, Katz JI, Keith DW, Patrinos AAN, Schrag DP, Socolow RH, Koonin SE (2009) Climate engineering responses to climate emergencies, NovimGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldeira K, Wood L (2008) Global and arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies. Philos Trans R Soc A 366:4039–4056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keith DW, Parsons E, Morgan MG (2010) Research on global sun block needed now. Nature 463:426–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giorgi F, Francisco R (2000) Evaluating uncertainties in the prediction of regional climate change. Geophys Res Lett 27(9):1295–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakicenovic N, Sturat R (2000) IPCC special report on emission scenarios. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Nordhaus W (2006) Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new Findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:3510–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, 234 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. NRC committee on stabilization targets for atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, climate stabilization targets: emissions, concentrations, and impacts over decades to millennia. The National Academies Press. ISBN:0-30915177-5. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12877.html
  12. Randall DA et al (2007) IPCC Climate change 2007: the physical science basisGoogle Scholar
  13. Rasch P, Crutzen P, Coleman D (2008) Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: the role of particle size. Geophys Res Lett 35:L02809, 6 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Ricke KL, Morgan MG, Allen MR (2010) Regional climate response to solar radiation management. Nature Geosciences 3:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robock A, Oman L, Stenchikov G (2008) Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J Geophys Res 113:D16101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robock A, Bunzl M, Kravitz B, Stenchikov GL (2010) A test for geoengineering. Science 327(5965):530–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shepherd J, Caldeira K, Haigh J, Keith D, Launder B, Mace G, MacKerron G, Pyle J, Rayner S, Redgwell C, Watson A (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal AcademyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan B. Moreno-Cruz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katharine L. Ricke
    • 3
  • David W. Keith
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaCanada
  2. 2.Energy and Environmental Systems Group, Institute for Sustainable Energy Environment and EconomyUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Engineering and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations