Climatic Change

, 107:169 | Cite as

Hurricane effects on subtropical pine rocklands of the Florida Keys

  • Sonali SahaEmail author
  • Keith Bradley
  • Michael S. Ross
  • Phillip Hughes
  • Thomas Wilmers
  • Pablo L. Ruiz
  • Chris Bergh


We investigate the effects of Hurricane Wilma’s storm surge (23–24 October 2005) on the dominant tree Pinus elliottii var densa (South Florida slash pine) and rare plant species in subtropical pine rocklands of the Lower Florida Keys. We examine the role of elevation on species abundance in 1995 (Hurricane Betsy in 1965), 2005 (Hurricane Georges in 1998), and 2008 (Hurricane Wilma in 2005) to investigate if hurricanes influence abundance by eliminating plants at lower elevation on Big Pine Key, the largest island in the Lower Florida Keys. We compare densities before and after Hurricane Wilma over the 2005–2008 sampling period and examine the role of elevation on changes in pine and rare species densities three years after Hurricane Wilma. We use elevation to assess the impact of hurricanes because elevation determined whether a location was influenced by storm surge (maximum surge of 2 m) in the Lower Florida Keys, where pine rocklands occur at a maximum elevation of 3 m. In 1995 (30 years after a major storm), elevation did not explain the abundance of South Florida slash pine or Chamaecrista lineata, but explained significant variation in abundance of Chamaesyce deltoidea. The latter two species are rare herbaceous plants restricted to pine rocklands. In 2008, 3 years after Hurricane Wilma, the positive relationship between elevation and abundance was strongest for South Florida slash pine, C. deltoidea, and C. lineata. Effects of Hurricane Wilma were not significant for rare species with wider distribution, occurring in plant communities adjacent to pine rocklands and in disturbed rocklands. Our results suggest that hurricanes drive population dynamics of South Florida slash pine and rare species that occur exclusively in pine rocklands at higher elevations. Rare species restricted to pine rocklands showed dramatic declines after Hurricane Wilma and were eliminated at elevations <0.5 m. Widely distributed rare species did not show significant changes in density after Hurricane Wilma. Abundance increased with elevation for South Florida slash pine and C. lineata after the hurricane. In an environment influenced by sea level rise, concrete plans to conserve pine ecosystems are warranted. Results from this study will help define conservation strategies by strengthening predictive understanding of plant responses to disturbance in the backdrop of sea level rise.


Rare Species Freshwater Lens Hurricane Effect Hardwood Hammock Hurricane Disturbance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Levine JM (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecol Lett 10:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander TR, Dickson JD III (1972) Vegetational changes in the National Key Deer Refuge-II. Q J Fla Acad Sci 35:85–96Google Scholar
  3. Batista WB, Platt WJ (2003) Tree population responses to hurricane disturbance: syndromes in a south-eastern USA old-growth forest. J Ecol 91:197–212Google Scholar
  4. Beckage B, Gross LJ, Platt WJ (2006) Modelling responses of pine savannas to climate change and large-scale disturbance. Appl Veg Sci 9:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergh C, Wisby J (1996) Fire history of lower Keys pine rocklands. The Nature Conservancy: unpublished document. Key West, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley KA, Gann GD (1999) Status summaries of 12 rockland plant taxa in Southern Florida. Report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Vero BeachGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley K, Saha S (2009) Post-hurricane responses of rare plant species and vegetation of pine rocklands in the lower Florida Keys. USFWS National Key Deer Refuge, Big Pine KeyGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown JM, Souza AJ, Wolf J (2010) Surge modelling in the eastern Irish Sea: present and future storm impact. Ocean Dyn 60:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burch DG (1966) Two new species of Chamaesyce, new combinations, and a key to the Caribbean members of the genus. Ann Mo Bot Gar 53:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Busby PE, Canham CD, Motzkin G (2009) Forest response to chronic hurricane disturbance in coastal New England. J Veg Sci 20:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crossett KT, Culliton J, Wiley P (2004) Population trends along the Coastal United States, 1980–2008. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle TW, O’Neil CP, Melder MPV, From AS, Palta MM (2007) Tidal freshwater swamps of the southeastern United States: effects of land use, hurricanes, sea-level rise, and climate change. In: Conner WH, Doyle TW, Krauss KW (eds) Ecology of tidal freshwater forested wetlands of the Southeastern United States. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feehan J, Harley M, Van Minnen J (2009) Climate change in Europe. 1. Impact on terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity: a review (Reprinted). Agron Sustai Dev 29:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FEMA Hazard Mitigation Technical Assistance Program (2006) Final coastal high water mark collection for Hurricane Wilma in Florida. FEMA-1609-DR-FL, Task Order 460. Atlanta, GA, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Folk ML (1991) Habitat of the Key Deer. Ph.D. Dissertation, Soutern Illinois University, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gann GD, Bradley KA, Woodmansee SW (2002) The rare plants of South Florida: their history, conservation and restoration. The Institute for Regional Conservation, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  17. Harcombe PA, Mann LE, Elsik IS (2009) Effects of hurricane rita on three long-term forest study plot in East Texas. Wetlands 29:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Herndon A (1993) A revision of the Chamaesyce deltoidea (Euphorbiaceae) complex of southern Florida. Rhodora 95:38–51Google Scholar
  20. Hodges SR, Bradley KA (2006) Distribution and population size of five candidate plant taxa in the Florida Keys. Report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Vero BeachGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopkinson CS, Lugo AE, Alber M et al (2008) Forecasting effects of sea-level rise and windstorms on coastal and inland ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 6:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Imbert D, Portecop J (2008) Hurricane disturbance and forest resilience: assessing structural vs. functional changes in a Caribbean dry forest. For Ecol Manag 255:3494–3501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenoir J, Gegout JC, Marquet PA et al (2008) A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science 320:1768–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lugo AE (2000) Effects and outcomes of Caribbean hurricanes in a climate change scenario. Sci Total Environ 262:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lugo AE (2008) Visible and invisible effects of hurricanes on forest ecosystems: an international review. Austral Ecol 33:368–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Middleton BA (2009) Regeneration of coastal marsh vegetation impacted by hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Wetlands 29:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller TE, Gornish E, Buckley H (2009) Climate and coastal dune vegetation: disturbance, recovery and succession. Plant Ecol 206:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morrison LW (2003) Plant species persistence and turnover on small Bahamian islands. Oecologia 136:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrison LW, Spiller DA (2008) Patterns and processes in insular floras affected by hurricanes. J Biogeogr 35:1701–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neumann CJ, Jarvinen BR, Pike AC et al (1987) Tropical cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, 1971–1986. National Climatic Data Center in cooperation with the National Hurricane Center, Coral GablesGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Hara RB, Kotze DH (2010) Do not log transfer count data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Penland S, Connor PF, Beall A (2005) Changes in Louisiana’s shoreline: 1855–2002. J Coast Res 44:S7-S39Google Scholar
  33. Pimm SL, Davis GE, Loope L (1994) Hurricane Andrew. BioScience 44:224–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly DJ et al (2007) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79–131Google Scholar
  36. Ross MS, Ruiz PL (1996) A study of the distribution of several south Florida endemic plants in the Florida Keys. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Southeast Environmental Research Program, Florida International University, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  37. Ross MS, Obrien JJ, Sternberg LDL (1994) Sea-level rise and the reduction in pine forests in the Florida Keys. Ecol Appl 4:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ross MS, Coultas C, Hsieh YP (2003) Soil-productivity relationships and organic matter turnover in dry tropical forests of the Florida Keys. Plant Soil 253:479–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross MS, O’Brien JJ, Ford RG et al (2009) Disturbance and the rising tide: the challenge of biodiversity management for low island ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 7:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sah J, Ross MS, Snyder JR et al (2010) Tree mortality following prescribed fire and a storm surge event in slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. densa) Forests in the Florida Keys, USA. Int J For Res 2010:204795. doi: 10.1155/2010/204795 Google Scholar
  41. Saha AK, Sternberg LDSL, Miralles-Wilhelm F (2009) Linking water sources with foliar nutrient status in upland plant communities in the Everglades National Park, USA. Ecohydrol 2:42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scatena FN (1995) Relative scales of time and effectiveness of watershed processes in a tropical montane rain forest of Puerto Rico. Geophys Monogr 89. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 103–111Google Scholar
  43. Scatena FN, Lugo AE (1995) Geomorphology, disturbance, and the soil and vegetation of two subtropical watersheds of Puerto Rico. Geomorphol 13:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simpson L (1982) History of Big Pine Key, Florida, 1873–1982. Mayfield Printing Company, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  46. Small JK (1913) Flora of the Florida Keys. Small, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Small JK (1933) Manual of the Southeastern Flora. Small, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith TJ, Anderson GH, Balentine K (2009) Cummulative impacts of hurricanes on Florida Mangrove ecosystems: sediment deposition, storm surges and vegetation. Wetlands 29:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith JM, Cialone MA, Wamsley TV et al (2010) Potential impact of sea level rise on coastal surges in southeast Louisiana. Ocean Eng 37:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snyder RL, Boss CL (2002) Recovery and stability in Barrier Island plant communities. J Coast Res 18:530–536Google Scholar
  51. Snyder JR, Herndon A, Robertson WB (1990) South Florida rockland. In: Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, pp 230–277Google Scholar
  52. Snyder JR, Ross MS, Koptur S (2005) Developing ecological criteria for prescribed fire in South Florida Pine Rockland Ecosystems. Final Report accessed on May 3, 2009Google Scholar
  53. Somerfield PJ, Jaap WC, Clarke KR et al (2008) Changes in coral reef communities among the Florida Keys, 1996–2003. Coral Reefs 27:951–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sternberg LSL, Teh SY, Ewe E et al (2008) Competition of hardwood hammock and mangrove vegetation. Ecosyst 10:648–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stive MJF (2004) How important is global warming for coastal erosion? An editorial comment. Clim Change 64:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teh SY, DeAngelis DL, Sternberg LSL et al (2008) Disturbance events can cause regime shifts between vegetation types: a model study of mangroves and hardwood hammocks. Ecol Model 213:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ugarte CA, Brandt LA, Melvin S et al (2006) Hurricane impacts to tree islands in Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Southeastern Naturalist 5:737–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Venable WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econom 57:307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams K, MacDonald M, Sternberg LDL (2007) Interactions of storm, drought, and sea-level rise on coastal forest: a case study. J Coast Res 19:1116–1121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonali Saha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Keith Bradley
    • 1
  • Michael S. Ross
    • 2
  • Phillip Hughes
    • 4
  • Thomas Wilmers
    • 4
  • Pablo L. Ruiz
    • 3
  • Chris Bergh
    • 5
  1. 1.The Institute for Regional ConservationMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth & Environment and Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceBig Pine KeyUSA
  5. 5.The Nature ConservancyBig Pine KeyUSA

Personalised recommendations