Climatic Change

, Volume 110, Issue 1–2, pp 143–167 | Cite as

Climate prediction for adaptation: Who needs what?

  • Antony MillnerEmail author


The role of short- and long-term climate predictions in determining the success of adaptation to climate change is investigated. A simple theoretical model that captures the relationship between adaptive performance, decision structure, and prediction accuracy at different temporal scales is developed, and its implications deduced. It is shown that users who face high adjustment costs (i.e. are inflexible) depend more heavily on accurate long-term predictions than those who are able to adjust their adaptation strategies at low cost. However, the constraints on the accuracy of long-term predictions in order for them to be ‘accurate enough’ to be recommended unreservedly are strongest for precisely those users who desire them most. There are thus intrinsic structural limitations to the utility of long-term predictions for adaptive decision making. In addition, the heterogeneous dependence of adaptive performance on predictions at different temporal scales gives rise to a resource allocation problem for investments aimed at improving predictions so as to maximize their social benefits. It is suggested that an explicit distributional framework that matches users’ needs with scientific feasibility is needed in order to guide such investments, and key issues any such framework will need to address are discussed.


Prediction Accuracy Lead Time Discount Factor Internal Variability Climate Prediction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27(2):249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger W, Agrawala S, Mirza M, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Working group II: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  3. Adger W, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson D, Naess L, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93(3):335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer ER (2003) Identifying underserved end-user groups in the provision of climate information. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84(11):1525–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boadway RF, Bruce N (1984) Welfare economics. Wiley BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  6. Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White Horse Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. CCSP (2008) Our changing planet: the US climate change science program for fiscal year 2009.
  8. Cox P, Stephenson D (2007) A changing climate for prediction. Science 317(5835):207–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cozzens SE (2007) Distributive justice in science and technology policy. Sci Public Policy 34:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. J Risk Uncertain 37(2):141–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Towards a new economics of science. Res Policy 23:487–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dessai S, Hulme M (2007) Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England. Glob Environ Change 17(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dessai S, Lu X, Risbey JS (2005) On the role of climate scenarios for adaptation planning. Glob Environ Change Part A 15(2):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R, Pielke Jr R (2009) Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, pp 64–78Google Scholar
  15. Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Fankhauser S, Smith J, Tol R (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol Econ 30:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frame DJ, Faull NE, Joshi MM, Allen MR (2007) Probabilistic climate forecasts and inductive problems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Sci 365(1857):1971–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gagnon-Lebrun F, Agrawala S (2006) Progress on adaptation to climate change in developed countries: an analysis of broad trends. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Gollier C (2001) The economics of risk and time. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1095–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heal G (2009) Climate economics: a meta-review and some suggestions for future research. Rev Environ Econ Policy 3(1):4–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson S, Holt M (1997) The value of weather information. In: Katz R, Murphy A (eds) Economic value of weather and climate forecasts. Cambridge University Press, pp 75–107Google Scholar
  23. Kelly DL, Kolstad CD, Mitchell GT (2005) Adjustment costs from environmental change. J Environ Econ Manage 50(3):468–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knutti R (2008) Should we believe model predictions of future climate change? Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Sci 366(1885):4647–4664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemos MC, Dilling L (2007) Equity in forecasting climate: can science save the world’s poor? Sci Public Policy 34:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lempert RJ, Collins MT (2007) Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Anal 27(4):1009–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Majd S, Pindyck RS (1987) Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. J Financ Econ 18(1):7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Williams L (2006) The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environ Dev Econ 11(2):159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy J, Booth B, Collins M, Harris G, Sexton D, Webb M (2007) A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Sci 365(1857):1993–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263(5147):641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmer T, Hagedorn R (eds) (2006) Predictability of weather and climate. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Parry M, Carter T (1998) Climate impact and adaptation assessment: a guide to the IPCC approach. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfaff A, Broad K, Glantz M (1999) Who benefits from climate forecasts? Nature 397(6721):645–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pielke Jr R (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Pielke Jr R, Carbone RE (2002) Weather impacts, forecasts, and policy: an integrated perspective. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(3):393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38(152):543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reilly J, Schimmelpfennig D (2000) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and learning: portraits of adaptation to long-term climate change. Clim Change 45(1):253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roberts K, Weitzman ML (1981) Funding criteria for research, development, and exploration projects. Econometrica 49(5):1261–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roe GH, Baker MB (2007) Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318(5850):629–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roncoli C (2006) Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers’ responses to climate predictions. Clim Res 33(1):81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarewitz DR, Pielke Jr R, Byerly R (2000) Prediction: science, decision making and the future of nature. Island PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Schneider SH, Easterling WE, Mearns LO (2000) Adaptation: sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions and dynamic climate changes. Clim Change 45(1):203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smit B, Skinner MW (2002) Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 7(1):85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith LA (2002) What might we learn from climate forecasts? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(Suppl 1):2487–2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith LA (2007) Chaos: a very short introduction, vol 159. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith DM, Cusack S, Colman AW, Folland CK, Harris GR, Murphy JM (2007) Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model. Science 317(5839):796–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solomon S, Plattner G, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):1704–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stainforth D, Allen M, Tredger E, Smith L (2007) Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Sci 365(1857):2145–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sulston J, Harris J (2008) What is science for? James Martin 21st century school public lecture. Oxford University.
  50. Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Sci 365(1857):2053–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tol RSJ, Downing TE, Kuik OJ, Smith JB (2004) Distributional aspects of climate change impacts. Glob Environ Change Part A 14(3):259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilby R, Wigley T (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21(4):530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. World Meteorological Organization (2007) Climate information for adaptation and development needs.
  54. Zickfeld K, Morgan MG, Frame DJ, Keith DW (2010) Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908906107 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations