Climatic Change

, Volume 105, Issue 3–4, pp 635–645 | Cite as

Implications of recent sea level rise science for low-elevation areas in coastal cities of the conterminous U.S.A.

A letter
  • Jeremy L. Weiss
  • Jonathan T. Overpeck
  • Ben Strauss
Letter

Abstract

Recently published work estimates that global sea level rise (SLR) approaching or exceeding 1 m by 2100 is plausible, thus significantly updating projections by the Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Furthermore, global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over the 21st century will not only influence SLR in the next ∼90 years, but will also commit Earth to several meters of additional SLR over subsequent centuries. In this context of worsening prospects for substantial SLR, we apply a new geospatial dataset to calculate low-elevation areas in coastal cities of the conterminous U.S.A. potentially impacted by SLR in this and following centuries. In total, 20 municipalities with populations greater than 300,000 and 160 municipalities with populations between 50,000 and 300,000 have land area with elevations at or below 6 m and connectivity to the sea, as based on the 1 arc-second National Elevation Dataset. On average, approximately 9% of the area in these coastal municipalities lies at or below 1 m. This figure rises to 36% when considering area at or below 6 m. Areal percentages of municipalities with elevations at or below 1–6 m are greater than the national average along the Gulf and southern Atlantic coasts. In contrast to the national and international dimensions of and associated efforts to curb GHG emissions, our comparison of low-elevation areas in coastal cities of the conterminous U.S.A. clearly shows that SLR will potentially have very local, and disproportionate, impacts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10584_2011_24_MOESM1_ESM.eps (15.8 mb)
(EPS 15.8 MB)
10584_2011_24_MOESM2_ESM.eps (4.1 mb)
(EPS 4.14 MB)
10584_2011_24_MOESM3_ESM.eps (308 kb)
(EPS 307 KB)
10584_2011_24_MOESM4_ESM.eps (23.2 mb)
(EPS 23.2 MB)
10584_2011_24_MOESM5_ESM.eps (14.1 mb)
(EPS 14.1 MB)
10584_2011_24_MOESM6_ESM.eps (3.9 mb)
(EPS 3.91 MB)

References

  1. Engelhart SE, Horton BP, Douglas BC, Peltier WR, Tornqvist TE (2009) Spatial variability of late Holocene and 20th century sea-level rise along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Geology 37:1115–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gesch DB (2007) The national elevation dataset. In: Maune D (ed) Digital elevation model technologies and applications: the DEM users manual. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, pp 99–118Google Scholar
  3. Gesch DB (2009) Analysis of lidar elevation data for improved identification and delineation of lands vulnerable to sea-level rise. J Coast Res SI53:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gesch D, Oimoen M, Greenlee S, Nelson C, Steuck M, Tyler D (2002) The national elevation dataset. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 68:5–11Google Scholar
  5. Gesch DB, Gutierrez BT, Gill SK (2009) Coastal elevations. In: Titus JG (ed) Coastal sensitivity to sea-level rise: a focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region. A report by the U.S. climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, pp 25–42Google Scholar
  6. Kirwan ML, Guntenspergen GR, D’Alpaos A, Morris JT, Mudd SM, Temmerman S (2010) Limits on the adaptability of coastal marshes to rising sea level. Geophys Res Lett 37:L23401. doi:10.1029/2010GL045489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knowles N (2010) Potential inundation due to rising sea levels in the San Francisco Bay region. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 8:1–19Google Scholar
  8. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, pp 747–846Google Scholar
  9. Overpeck JT, Weiss JL (2009) Projections of future sea level becoming more dire. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:21461–21462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Overpeck JT, Otto-Bliesner BL, Miller GH, Muhs DR, Alley RB, Kiehl JT (2006) Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311:1747–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parker B, Hess K, Milbert D, Gill S (2003) A national vertical datum transformation tool. Sea Technol 44:10–15Google Scholar
  12. Pfeffer WT, Harper JT, O’Neel S (2008) Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea-level rise. Science 321:1340–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Poulter B, Halpin PN (2008) Raster modeling of coastal flooding from sea-level rise. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schneider SH, Semenov S, Patwardhan A, Burton I, Magadza CHD, Oppenheimer M, Pittock AB, Rahman A, Smith JB, Suarez A, Yamin F (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, pp 779–810Google Scholar
  15. Solomon S, Plattner GK, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1704–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Titus JG, Wang J (2008) Maps of lands close to sea level along the middle Atlantic coast of the United States: an elevation data set to use while waiting for LIDAR. Section 1.1. In: Titus JG, Strange EM (eds) Background documents supporting climate change science program synthesis and assessment product 4.1, EPA 430R07004, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, pp 2–44Google Scholar
  17. Tornqvist TE, Wallace DJ, Storms JEA, Wallinga J, Van Dam RL, Blaauw M, Derksen MS, Klerks CJW, Meijneken C, Snijders EMA (2008) Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene strata. Nat Geosci 1:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2010) National wetlands inventory website. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/
  19. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:21527–21532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yin JJ, Schlesinger ME, Stouffer RJ (2009) Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States. Nat Geosci 2:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yin JJ, Griffies SM, Stouffer RJ (2010) Spatial variability of sea level rise in twenty-first century projections. J Climate 23:4585–4607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang KQ, Douglas BC, Leatherman SP (2004) Global warming and coastal erosion. Clim Change 64:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy L. Weiss
    • 1
  • Jonathan T. Overpeck
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ben Strauss
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Institute of the EnvironmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  4. 4.Climate CentralPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations