Climatic Change

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 57–70 | Cite as

Policy solutions in the U.S.

Article

Abstract

The paper focuses on relocation, retreat, zoning, insurance, and subsidy as major dimensions of coastal hazard mitigation measures that have resurfaced as potent forces for combating coastal inundation and climate change. It reviews the issues surrounding the practice of these measures and discusses compatibilities of policies, engineering measures, and natural defense. Property rights, development interest, and distorted financial incentives pose as main barriers to coastal relocation and retreat policies in hazard-prone areas. To understand and propose coastal adaptation solutions, the paper recommends place-based studies of local coastal adaptation strategies. Place-based studies offer an in-depth knowledge of local conditions specifically regarding the level of implementation of hazard mitigation policies, and shed light on important trade-offs and synergies of various hazard policies. In addition, coupling existing hazard mitigation policies with coastal management and community management can better inform long-term and comprehensive planning of coastal adaptation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen S, Globe Staff (1999) Storm brewing over disaster relief; government policy encourages people to remain in harm’s way, many officials argue. The Boston Globe SECTION: NATIONAL/FOREIGN; Pg. A1 (September 20, 1999, Monday, City Edition)Google Scholar
  2. Bagstad KJ, Stapleton K, D’Agostino JR (2007) Taxes, subsidies, and insurance as drivers of the United States coastal development. Ecol Econ 63:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellingham, Massachusetts Virtual Town Hall Website (2010) Zoning amendments for May 2010 town meeting. Accessed Online 17 July 2010: http://www.bellinghamma.org/Pages/BellinghamMA_Planning/Zoning%20amendments.as%20submitted%20to%20BOS.2.16.10.pdf
  4. Blanchard-Boehm RD, Berry KA, Showalter PS (2001) Should flood insurance be mandatory? insights in the wake of the 1997 New Year’s Day flood in Reno-Sparks, Nevada. Appl Geogr 21:199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecol Econ 68(8–9):2265–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brannan v. State of Texas, S.W.3d, No. 01-08-00179-CV (2010) WL 375921 (Tex. Ct. App.-Houston [1 Dist.] Feb. 4, 2010). Accessed online: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1255339.html
  7. Burby RJ, Deyle RE, Godschalk DR, Olshansky RB (2000) Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Nat Hazards Rev 1:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell M, Segall CH (2007) No day at the beach: sea level rise, ecosystem loss, and public access along the California coast. Econ Law Quart 34:533–578Google Scholar
  9. Campbell J (2010) Climate-induced community relocation in the pacific: the meaning and importance of land. Electronic, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  10. Cernea MM, Schmidt-Soltau K (2006) Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Dev 34:1808–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheong SM (2010) A social assessment of the Hebei-Spirit oil spill. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-010-9368-4 Google Scholar
  12. Cigler BA (2009) Post-Katrina hazard mitigation on the gulf coast. Public Organ Rev 9:325–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper JAG, Mckenna J (2008) Working with natural processes: the challenge for coastal protection strategies. Geogr J 174(4):315–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crichton D (2008) Role of insurance in reducing flood risk. Geneva Pap 33:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins JD (2006) Should the government provide insurance for catastrophes? Fed Reserve Bank ST 88:337–379Google Scholar
  16. Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Mitchell JT, Boruff BJ, Gall M, Schmidtlein MC, Burton CG, Melton G (2006) The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment 48:8–20Google Scholar
  17. D’Agostino JR (2008) Resistance to resilience: coastal hazard policy, science & planning in New Jersey. Sea Grant Law Policy J 1(1):116Google Scholar
  18. Dawson RJ, Dickson ME, Nicholls RJ, Hall JW, Walkden MJA, Stansby PK, Mokrech M, Richards J, Zhou J, Milligan J, Jordan A, Pearson S, Rees J, Bates PD, Koukoulas S, Watkinson AR (2009) Integrated analysis of risks of coastal flooding and cliff erosion under scenarios of long term change. Clim Change 95:249–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dehring CA (2006) Building codes and land values in high hazard areas. Land Econ 82:513–528Google Scholar
  20. Deyle RE, Chapin TS, Baker EJ (2008) An evaluation of Florida’s hurricane exposure mitigation planning mandate. JAPA 74:349–370Google Scholar
  21. FEMA (1995) FEMA takes action to implement National flood insurance reform act. Federal emergency management agency. Accessed online 17 July 2010: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/nfip/95buletn.pdf
  22. Gaul GM, Wood AR (2000) Inquirer staff writers, along the water, disasters waiting for their moment billions of dollars are spent to sustain expensive properties imperiled by storms. The Philadelphia Inquirer SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. A01 (March 5, 2000 Sunday D EDITION)Google Scholar
  23. Glavovic BC (2008) Sustainable coastal communities in the age of coastal storms: reconceptualising coastal planning as ‘new’ naval architecture. J Coast Conserv 12:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzalez-Parra C, Simon J (2008) All that glitters is not gold—resettlement, vulnerability and social exclusion in the Pehuenche community Ayin Mapu, Chile. Am Behav Sci 51:1774–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gravin E (2001) Making use of overlay zones. PCJ 43:16–17Google Scholar
  26. Green C, Penning-Rowsell E (2004) Flood insurance and government: “parasitic” and “symbiotic” relations. Geneva Pap Risk Insur, Issues Pract 29:518–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawes E (1998) Coastal natural hazards mitigation: the erosion of regulatory retreat in South Carolina. SC Environ Law J 7:55–88Google Scholar
  28. Heinz Center (2000) The hidden costs of coastal hazards: implications for risk assessment and mitigation. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Herweijer C, Ranger N, Ward RET (2009) Adaptation to climate change: threats and opportunities for the insurance industry. Geneva Pap 34:360–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Higgins M (2008) Legal and policy impacts of sea level rise to beaches and coastal property. Sea Grant Law Policy J 1(1):43Google Scholar
  31. Hoeppe P, Gurenko EN (2006) Scientific and economic rationales for innovative climate insurance solutions. Clim Policy 6:607–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Houlahan JM (1989) Comparison of state construction setbacks to manage development in coastal hazard areas. Coast Manage 17:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hwang DJ (1991) Shoreline setback regulations and the takings analysis. Univ Hawaii Law Rev 13(1):1–56Google Scholar
  34. Ingram JC, Franco G, Rumbaitis-del Rio C, Khazai B (2006) Post-disaster recovery dilemmas: challenges in balancing short-term and long-term needs for vulnerability reduction. Environ Sci Policy 9:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Jha AK, Duyne Barenstein J, Phelps PM, Pittet D, Sena S (2010) Safer homes, stronger communities: a handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. World Bank Publications, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (1999) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio 28:182–187Google Scholar
  38. Kunreuther H (1996) Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. J Risk Uncertain 12:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kunreuther H (2008) Reducing losses from catastrophic risks through long-term insurance and mitigation. Soc Res 75:905–930Google Scholar
  40. Kunreuther H, Roth RJ (1998) Paying the price: the status and role of insurance against natural disasters in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Kunreuther HC, Michel-Kerjan EO, Doherty NA, Grace MF, Klein RW, Pauly MV (2009) At war with the weather: managing large-scale risks in a new Era of catastrophes. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Lester C (2005) An overview of California’s coastal hazards policy. In: Griggs GB, Patsch K, Savoy LE (eds) Living with the changing California coast. UC Press, Berkeley, pp 138–162Google Scholar
  43. Lindell MK, Prater CS (2003) Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Nat Hazards Rev 4:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mangone GJ (2010) American beach law and policies. Ocean Coast Manag 53:454–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mcleman R, Smit B (2006) Vulnerability to climate change hazards and risks: crop and flood insurance. Can Geogr 50:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mills H (2009) Fighting against the tide. Best’s review 110:7 ABI/INFORM Global 39Google Scholar
  47. Minnesota Dept of Natural Resources (2010) Shoreline management rules. Chapter 6120. 1–119 files.dnr.state.mn.us/.../shoreland/shoreland_rules_plus_SONAR.doc. Accessed Sept 2010
  48. Mutton D, Haque CE (2004) Human vulnerability, dislocation, and resettlement: adaptation processes of river-bank erosion-induced displacees in Bangladesh. Disasters 28:41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V, Woodroffe CD, Hay J (2008) Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment: scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci 3:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nichols SS, Bruch C (2008) New frameworks for managing dynamic coasts: legal and policy tools for adapting U.S. coastal zone management to climate change. Sea Grant Law Policy J 1(1):19Google Scholar
  51. NOAA (2007a) Office of ocean & coastal resource management: erosion control easements. National oceanic and atmospheric administration. Accessed online 2 March 2010: http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/initiatives/shoreline_ppr_easements.html#2
  52. NOAA (2007b) Office of ocean & coastal resource management: construction setbacks. National oceanic and atmospheric administration. Accessed online 2 March 2010: http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/initiatives/shoreline_ppr_setbacks.html
  53. NOAA (2010) Office of ocean & coastal resource management: land acquisition. National oceanic and atmospheric administration. http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/initiatives/shoreline_ppr_acquisition.html. Accessed Sept 2010
  54. Olsen G, Carstensen, Hoyen K (2003) Humanitarian crisis: what determines the level of emergency assistance? Media coverage, donor interests, and the aid business. Disasters 27(2):109– 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olshanksy RB, Kartez JD (1998) Managing land use to build resilience. In: Burby RJ (ed) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, Chapter 6. Joseph Henry Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Peloso ME (2010) Adapting to rising sea levels. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  57. Platt RH, Salvesen D, Baldwin GH (2002) Rebuilding the North Carolina coast after Hurricane Fran: did public regulations matter? Coast Manage 30:249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perry RW, Lindell MK (2002) Principles for managing community relocation as a hazard mitigation measure. JCCM 5:49–59Google Scholar
  59. Pomeroy Robert S, Ratner Blake D, Halla Spephen J, Pimoljinda J, Vivekanandan V (2006) Coping with disaster: rehabilitating coastal livelihoods and communities. Mar Policy 30:786–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pompe JJ, Rinehart JR (2008) Property insurance for coastal residents: governments’ “ill wind.” Indep Rev 13:189–207Google Scholar
  61. Rosenblum J (2008) Regulatory takings issue: rolling beach easement not a taking. SandBar 7:1, 5–6 Regulatory takings issue, April, 2008. Accessed online 1 March 2010: http://nsglc.olemiss.edu/SandBar/SandBar7/7.1rolling.htm
  62. Ruppert TK (2008) Eroding long-term prospects for Florida’s beaches: Florida’s coastal construction control line program. Sea Grant Law Policy J 1(1):65Google Scholar
  63. Sales RFM (2009) Vulnerability and adaptation of coastal communities to climate variability and sea-level rise: their implications for integrated coastal management in Cavite City, Philippines. Ocean Coast Manag 52:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwarze R, Wagner GG (2004) In the aftermath of Dresden: new directions in German flood insurance. Geneva Pap Risk Insur 29:154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Severance v. Patterson, 566 F.3d 490, 503-04 (5th Cir.2009) Accessed online: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-5th-circuit/1368750.html
  66. Small C, Nicholls RJ (2003) A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J Coastal Res 19:584–599Google Scholar
  67. Smith VL, Carbone JC, Pope J, Hallstrom D, Darden M (2006) Adjusting to natural disasters. J Risk Uncertain 33:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smolka A (2006) Natural disasters and the challenge of extreme events: risk management from an insurance perspective. Philos Trans R Soc A 364:2147–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spence R (2004) Risk and regulation: can improved government action reduce the impacts of natural disasters? Build Res Inf 32:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Titus JG (1984) Planning for sea level rise before and after a coastal disaster. In: Barth MC, Titus JG (eds) Greenhouse effect and sea level rise: a challenge for this generation, Chapter 8. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, IncGoogle Scholar
  71. Titus JG (1998) Rising seas, coastal erosion, and the takings clause: how to save wetlands and beaches without hurting property owners. MD L Rev 57:1279–1399Google Scholar
  72. Titus JG, Hudgens DE, Trescott DL, Craghan M, Nuckols WH, Hershner CH, Kassakian JM, Linn CJ, Merritt PG, McCue TM, O’Connell JF, Tanski J, Wang J (2009) State and local governments’ plan for development of most land vulnerable to rising sea level along the US Atlantic coast. Environ Res Lett 4:044008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. UNISDR (2009) Applying disaster risk reduction for climate change adaptation: country practices and lessons. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat. Accessed online 26 June 2010: http://gfdrr.org/docs/ISDR_Applying_DRR_For_CCA.pdf
  74. US Congress (2008) The Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2008, H.R. 3121, 110th Cong. Accessed online 26 June 2010: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3121
  75. US Supreme Court (1992) Lucas v. South carolina coastal council, 505 U.S. 1003. Accessed online 26 June 2010: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/505bv.pdf
  76. Van Asseldonk MAPM, Meuwissen MPM, Huirne RBM (2003) Belief in disaster relief and the demand for a public-private insurance program. Rev Agric Econ 24:196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Warner K, Ranger N, Surminski S, Arnold M, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Michel-Kerjan E, Kovacs P, Herweijer C (2009) Adaptation to climate change: linking disaster risk reduction and insurance. United Nations International Strategy on Disaster Reduction SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  78. Wong PP (2009) Rethinking post-tsunami integrated coastal management for Asia-Pacific. Ocean Coast Manage 52:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yohe G, Neumann J (1997) Planning for sea level rise and shoreline protection under climate uncertainty. Clim Change 37:243–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations