What do near-term observations tell us about long-term developments in greenhouse gas emissions?
- First Online:
- 171 Downloads
Long-term scenarios developed by integrated assessment models are used in climate research to provide an indication of plausible long-term emissions of greenhouse gases and other radiatively active substances based on developments in the global energy system, land-use and the emissions associated with these systems. The phenomena that determine these long-term developments (several decades or even centuries) are very different than those that operate on a shorter time-scales (a few years). Nevertheless, in the literature, we still often find direct comparisons between short-term observations and long-term developments that do not take into account the differing dynamics over these time scales. In this letter, we discuss some of the differences between the factors that operate in the short term and those that operate in the long term. We use long-term historical emissions trends to show that short-term observations are very poor indicators of long-term future emissions developments. Based on this, we conclude that the performance of long-term scenarios should be evaluated against the appropriate, corresponding long-term variables and trends. The research community may facilitate this by developing appropriate data sets and protocols that can be used to test the performance of long-term scenarios and the models that produce them.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2010) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USAGoogle Scholar
- Edmonds J, Reilly J (1985) Global energy—assessing the future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Nakicenovic N, Alfsen K, Corfee Morlot J, de la Chesnaye F, Hourcade J-C, Jiang K, Kainuma M, La Rovere E, Matysek A, Rana A, Riahi K, Richels R, Rose S, Van Vuuren D, Warren R, Ambrosi P, Birol F, Bouille D, Clapp C, Eickhout B, Hanaoka T, Mastrandrea MD, Matsuoko Y, O’Neill B, Pitcher H, Rao S, Toth F (2007) Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) Climate change 2007. Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 169–250Google Scholar
- Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Marland G, Bopp L, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Doney SC, Feely RA, Foster PN, Friedlingstein P, Gurney KR, Houghton RA, House JI, Huntingford C, Levy PE, Lomas MR, Majkut J, Metzl N, Ometto JP, Peters GP, Prentice IC, Randerson JT, Running SW, Sarmiento JL, Schuster U, Sitch S, Takahashi T, Viovy N, van der Werf GR, Woodward FI (2009) Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci 2:831–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature08823 Google Scholar
- Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Yong Jung T, Kram T, Lebre La Rovere E, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen SNV, Dadi Z (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- NASA (2010) http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
- Olivier JGJ, Peters JAHW (2010) No growth in total global CO2 emissions in 2009. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
- Parson E, Burkett V, Fisher-Vanden K, Keith DW, Mearns LO, Pitcher H, Rosenzweig C, Webster M (2007) Global change scenarios: their development and use. Sub-report 2.1B of synthesis and assessment product 2.1 U.S. Climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research. Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Richardson K, Steffen W, Schellnhuber HJ, Alcamo J, Barker T, Kammen DM, Leemans R, Liverman D, Munasinghe M, Osman-Elasha B, Stern N, Wæver O (2009) Climate change. Copenhagen 2009, 10–12 March. Synthesis report. University of Copenhagen, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Richels RG, Manne AS, Wigley TML (2004) Moving beyond concentrations: the challange of limiting temperature change. AEI-Brooking Joint Center for regulatory studies, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
- Sheehan P (2008) The new global growth path: implications for climate change analysis and policy. Clim ChangeGoogle Scholar
- Shell International (2001) Energy needs, choices, and possibilities: scenarios to 2050. Global Business EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
- Wilson C (2009) Meta-analysis of unit and industry level scaling dynamics in energy technologies and climate change mitigation scenarios. International Institute of Applied System Analysis. IIASA Interim Report IR-09-029. Laxenbourg, AustriaGoogle Scholar