Climatic Change

, Volume 102, Issue 3–4, pp 699–707 | Cite as

High-resolution streamflow trend analysis applicable to annual decision calendars: a western United States case study

A letter
  • Jong-Suk Kim
  • Shaleen Jain


Changes in the seasonality of streamflow in the western United States have important implications for water resources management and the wellbeing of coupled human-natural systems. An assessment of changes in the timing and magnitude of streamflow resolved at fine time scales (days to weeks and seasons) is highly relevant to adaptive management strategies that are responsive to changing hydrologic baselines. In this paper, we present a regional analysis of the changes in streamflow seasonality through a broad classification of streams and quantification of increases and decreases in flow, based on a quantile regression methodology. This analysis affords a useful research product to examine the diversity of trends across seasons for individual streams. The trend analysis methodology can identify windows of change, thus revealing vulnerabilities within decision calendars and species lifecycles, an important consideration for adaptation and mitigation efforts.


Streamflow Quantile Regression Reservoir Operation Rule Curve Annual Streamflow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10584_2010_9933_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (387 kb)
(PDF 388 kb)
10584_2010_9933_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (3 mb)
(PDF 3.03 MB)
10584_2010_9933_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (570 kb)
(PDF 572 kb)


  1. Barbosa SM (2008) Quantile trends in Baltic sea level. Geophys Res Lett 35:L22704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. BPA/Bonneville Power Administration (2010) The Life cycle of Pacific Salmon. Accessed 7 July 2010
  4. Corringham T, Westerling AL, Morehouse B (2008) Exploring use of climate information in wildland fire management: a decision calendar study. J For 106:71–77Google Scholar
  5. FCRPS/Federal Columbia River Power System (2001) The Columbia River System: inside story, Bonneville Power Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Accessed 28 April 2010
  6. Hidalgo H et al (2009) Detection and attribution of streamflow timing changes to climate change in the western United States. J Clim 22:3838–3855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koenker R (2005) Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luce CH, Holden ZA (2009) Declining annual streamflow distributions in the Pacific Northwest United States, 1948–2006. Geophys Res Lett 36:L16401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCabe GJ (1995) Relations between winter atmospheric circulation and annual streamflow in the western United States. Clim Res 5:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. NAS/National Academy of Sciences Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate-Related Decision Support (2009) Informing decisions in a changing climate. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Pizarro G, Lall U (2002) El Nino-induced flooding in the U.S. West: what can we expect? Eos Trans AGU 83:349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pulwarty RS, Melis TS (2001) Climate extremes and adaptive management on the Colorado River: lessons from the 1997–1998 ENSO event. J Environ Manag 63:307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pulwarty RS, Redmond KT (1997) Climate and salmon restoration in the Columbia River Basin: the role and usability of seasonal forecasts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:381–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ray AJ et al (2007) Applications of Monsoon research: opportunities to inform decision making and reduce regional vulnerability. J Climate 20:1608–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Regonda SK et al (2005) Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the western United States. J Climate 18:372–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reilly TE et al (2008) Ground-water availability in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1323Google Scholar
  17. Slack JR, Lumb AM, Landwehr JM (1993) USGS open-file report 92-129, hydro-climatic data network: a U.S. Geological Survey stream flow data set for the United States for the study of climate variations, 1874–1988. Technical Report, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  18. Stewart IT, Cayan D, Dettinger MD (2005) Changes towards earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J Climate 18:1136–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil & Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.Climate Change InstituteUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations