Toward Bayesian uncertainty quantification for forestry models used in the United Kingdom Greenhouse Gas Inventory for land use, land use change, and forestry
- 333 Downloads
The Greenhouse Gas Inventory for the United Kingdom currently uses a simple carbon-flow model, CFLOW, to calculate the emissions and removals associated with forest planting since 1920. Here, we aim to determine whether a more complex process-based model, the BASic FORest (BASFOR) simulator, could be used instead of CFLOW. The use of a more complex approach allows spatial heterogeneity in soils and weather to be accounted for, but places extra demands on uncertainty quantification. We show how Bayesian methods can be used to address this problem.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dewar RC, Cannell MGR (1992) Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations—an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiol 11:49–71Google Scholar
- Galloway JN (1985) The deposition of sulphur and nitrogen from the remote atmosphere. In: Galloway JN, Charlson RJ, Andrew MO et al (eds) Biogeochemical cycling of sulphur and nitrogen in the remote atmosphere. NATO ASI Series D. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Global Soil Data Task (2000) Global gridded surfaces of selected soil characteristics (IGBP-DIS). International Geosphere–Biosphere programme—Data and information services. Available at http://www.daac.ornl.gov
- Hulme M, Jenkins GJ (1998) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: scientific report. KCIP Technical report no 1, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 80 pp. Available at http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/link/ukcip/ukcip_report.html
- Joos F, Bruno M, Fink R et al (1996) An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake. Tellus 48B:397–416Google Scholar
- Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T et al (eds) (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry, IGES/IPCC. Available at http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp
- Robert CP, Casella G (1999) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, New York, pp xxi + 507Google Scholar
- Thomson AM, van Oijen M (eds) (2007) Inventory and projections of UK emissions by sources and removals by sinks due to land use, land use change and forestry. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology/DEFRA, London, 197 ppGoogle Scholar
- van Oijen M, Jandl R (2004) Nitrogen fluxes in two Norway spruce stands in Austria: an analysis by means of process-based modelling. Austrian J For Sci 12:167–182Google Scholar
- van Oijen M, Rougier J, Smith R (2005) Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Physiol 25:915–927Google Scholar
- van Oijen M, Ågren GI, Chertov O et al (2008) Application of process-based models to explain and predict changes in European forest growth. In: Kahle HP, Karjalainen T, Schuck A et al (eds) Causes and consequences of forest growth trends in Europe. Brill, Leiden, pp 67–80Google Scholar