Historical and future anthropogenic emission pathways derived from coupled climate–carbon cycle simulations
- 878 Downloads
Using a coupled climate–carbon cycle model, fossil fuel carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are derived through a reverse approach of prescribing atmospheric CO2 concentrations according to observations and future projections, respectively. In the second half of the twentieth century, the implied fossil fuel emissions, and also the carbon uptake by land and ocean, are within the range of observational estimates. Larger discrepancies exist in the earlier period (1860–1960), with small fossil fuel emissions and uncertain emissions from anthropogenic land cover change. In the IPCC SRES A1B scenario, the simulated fossil fuel emissions more than double until 2050 (17 GtC/year) and then decrease to 12 GtC/year by 2100. In addition to A1B, an aggressive mitigation scenario was employed, developed within the European ENSEMBLES project, that peaks at 530 ppm CO2(equiv) around 2050 and then decreases to approach 450 ppm during the twenty-second century. Consistent with the prescribed pathway of atmospheric CO2 in E1, the implied fossil fuel emissions increase from currently 8 GtC/year to about 10 by 2015 and decrease thereafter. In the 2050s (2090s) the emissions decrease to 3.4 (0.5) GtC/year, respectively. As in previous studies, our model simulates a positive climate–carbon cycle feedback which tends to reduce the implied emissions by roughly 1 GtC/year per degree global warming. Further, our results suggest that the 450 ppm stabilization scenario may not be sufficient to fulfill the European Union climate policy goal of limiting the global temperature increase to a maximum of 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels.
KeywordsCarbon Cycle Gross Primary Production Land Cover Change Carbon Cycle Model Stabilization Scenario
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Canadell JG, Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Field CB, Buitehuis ET, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Houghton RA, Marland G (2007) Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:18866–18870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Council of the European Union (2004) 2632nd Council meeting press release: environment, council of the European union, Brussels (available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=PRES/04/357&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en)
- Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R, Bopp L, von Bloh W, Brovkin V, Cadule P, Doney S, Eby M, Fung I, Bala G, John J, Jones C, Joos F, Kato T, Kawamiya M, Knorr W, Lindsay K, Matthews HD, Raddatz T, Rayner P, Reick C, Roeckner E, Schnitzler K-G, Schnur R, Strassmann K, Weaver AJ, Yoshikawa C, Zeng N (2006) Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Climate 19:3337–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Houghton RA (2008) Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes 1850–2005. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (available at http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/landuse/houghton/houghton.html)
- Maier-Reimer E, Kriest I, Segschneider J, Wetzel P (2005) The Hamburg ocean carbon cycle model HAMOCC5.1—technical description release 1.1. Reports on earth system science 14 [available from Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany, http://www.mpimet.mpg.de]
- Marland G, Boden TA, Andres RJ (2003) Global, regional and national emissions. In trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USAGoogle Scholar
- Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic NJ, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 392Google Scholar
- Solomon S, 30 Co-authors (2007) Technical summary. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Technical report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- United Nations (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (available at http://www.unfccc.int)