Climatic Change

, Volume 100, Issue 3–4, pp 787–795 | Cite as

Does the model regional bias affect the projected regional climate change? An analysis of global model projections

A letter
  • Filippo Giorgi
  • Erika Coppola


An analysis is presented of the dependence of the regional temperature and precipitation change signal on systematic regional biases in global climate change projections. The CMIP3 multi-model ensemble is analyzed over 26 land regions and for the A1B greenhouse gas emission scenario. For temperature, the model regional bias has a negligible effect on the projected regional change. For precipitation, a significant correlation between change and bias is found in about 30% of the seasonal/regional cases analyzed, covering a wide range of different climate regimes. For these cases, a performance-based selection of models in producing climate change scenarios can affect the resulting change estimate, and it is noted that a minimum of four to five models is needed to obtain robust precipitation change estimates. In a number of cases, models with largely different precipitation biases can still produce changes of consistent sign. Overall, it is assessed that in the present generation of models the regional bias does not appear to be a dominant factor in determining the simulated regional change in the majority of cases.


Multimodel Ensemble CMIP3 Ensemble Projected Regional Climate Change Reliability Ensemble Average Global Model Projection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Buser CM, Kunsch HR, Luthi D, Wild M, Schär C (2009) Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: bias assumptions and interannual variability. Clim Dyn 33:849–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Déqué M et al (2005) Global high resolution vs. regional climate model climate change scenarios over Europe: quantifying confidence level from PRUDENCE results. Clim Dyn 25:653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giorgi F (2005) Climate change prediction. Clim Change 73:239–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giorgi F (2008) A simple equation for regional climate change and associated uncertainties. J Climate 21:1589–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giorgi F, Bi X (2005) Updated regional precipitation and temperature changes for the 21st century from ensembles of recent AOGCM simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32:L21715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giorgi F, Francisco R (2000) Uncertainties in regional climate change predictions. A regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 GCM. Clim Dyn 16:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Glob Planet Change 63:90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average, uncertainty range and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the ‘reliability ensemble averaging’ (REA) method. J Climate 15:1141–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene A, Goddard L, Lall U (2006) Probabilistic multi-model regional temperature change projections. J Climate 19:4326–4343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000) Special report on emission scenarios. In: Nakicenovic N et al (eds) Cambridge University Press, New York, p 599Google Scholar
  11. Kittel TGF, Giorgi F, Meehl GA (1998) Intercomparison of regional biases and doubled CO2-sensitivity of coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model experiments. Clim Dyn 14:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meehl GA et al (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel ensemble—a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1383–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murphy JM et al (2004) Quantification of modeling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 429:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. New M, Hulme M, Jones PD et al (2000) Representing twentieth century space–time climate variability. Part II: development of 1901–1996 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Climate 13:2217–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raisanen J (2007) How reliable are climate models? Tellus A 59:2–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raisanen J, Ruolokainen L, Ylhaisi J (2010) Weighting model results for improving best estimates of climate change. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-009-0659-8 Google Scholar
  17. Shukla J, DelSole T, Fennesy M, Kinter J, Paolino D (2006) Climate model fidelity and projections of climate change. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spelman MJ, Manabe S (1984) Influence of oceanic heat transport upon the sensitivity of a model climate. J Geophys Res 89:571–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 365:2053–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tebaldi C, Smith R, Nychka D, Mearns LO (2005) Quantifying uncertainties in projections of regional climate change: a Bayesian approach to the analysis of multi-model ensembles. J Climate 18:1524–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Whetton P, Macadam I, Bathols J, O’Grady J (2007) Assessment of the use of current climate patterns to evaluate regional enhanced greenhouse response patterns of climate models. Geophys Res Lett 34:L14701CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth System Physics SectionInternational Centre for Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations