Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 100, Issue 1, pp 87–101 | Cite as

Bridging the gap: linking climate-impacts research with adaptation planning and management

  • Michael D. MastrandreaEmail author
  • Nicole E. Heller
  • Terry L. Root
  • Stephen H. Schneider
Article

Abstract

A critical challenge in supporting climate change adaptation is improving the linkage between climate-impacts and vulnerability research and public and private planning and management decisions. We highlight the need for bottom-up/top-down vulnerability assessment, bringing together bottom-up knowledge of existing vulnerabilities with top-down climate-impact projections, as a transparent basis for informing decisions intended to reduce vulnerability. This approach can be used to evaluate the likelihood of crossing identified thresholds of exposure, and to evaluate alternative adaptation strategies based on their ability to reduce sensitivity to projected changes in exposure and their robustness across uncertainty in future outcomes. By identifying thresholds for which adaptive capacity is limited in particular systems, adaptation and mitigation become complements where the magnitudes of climate change at which such thresholds cluster can help to define mitigation targets.

Keywords

Adaptive Capacity Emission Scenario Vulnerability Assessment Rapid Climate Change Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in Coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  4. Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian Western Arctic Community. Conserv Ecol 5:18Google Scholar
  5. Dessai S, Hulme M (2004) Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Clim Policy 4:107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dessai S, Adger WN, Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Köhler J, Warren R (2004) Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Clim Change 64:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK, p 19Google Scholar
  9. Knowles N (2009) Potential inundation due to rising sea levels in the San Francisco Bay Region. PIER Research Report CEC-500-2009-023-FGoogle Scholar
  10. Lemos MC, Morehouse B (2005) The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Change 15:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu J et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maurer EP, Hidalgo HG (2008) Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19:17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McNie E (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moser SC (2006) Climate scenarios and projections: the known, the unknown, and the unknowable as applied to California. Synthesis Report of a workshop held at the Aspen Global Change Institute, 11–14 March 2004 in Aspen, Colorado, Elements of Change series, AGCI, Aspen, COGoogle Scholar
  16. Moser SC, Luers AL (2008) Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change. Clim Change 87(Suppl 1):S309–S322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecolog Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Patt AG, Tadross M, Nussbaumerc P, Asante K, Metzger M, Rafael J, Goujon A, Brundrit G (2009) Estimating least-developed countries’ vulnerability to climate-related extreme events over the next 50 years. PNAS 107:1333–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rayner S, Lach D, Ingram H (2005) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Change 69:197–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richardson DM, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan J, Sax DF, Schwartz MW, Brennan J, Gonzalez P, Root T, Sala O, Schneider SH, Ashe D, Camacho A, Clark JR, Early R, Etterson J, Fielder D, Gill J, Minteer BA, Polasky S, Safford H, Thompson A, Vellend M (2009) Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:9721–9724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Root T (1988a) Energy constraints on avian distributions and abundances. Ecology 69:330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Root T (1988b) Environmental factors associated with avian distributional limits. J Biogeogr 15:489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (2009) Living with a rising bay: vulnerability and adaptation in San Francisco Bay and on its shoreline, draft staff report, April 7Google Scholar
  25. Sarewitz D, Pielke RA Jr (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneider SH, Semenov S, Patwardhan A, Burton I, Magadza CHD, Oppenheimer M, Pittock AB, Rahman A, Smith JB, Suarez A, Yamin F (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability—contribution of working group II to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 779–810Google Scholar
  27. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomalla F, Downing TE, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockström J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: Towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tingley MW, Monahan WB, Beissinger SR, Moritz C (2009) Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19637–19643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tribbia J, Moser SC (2008) More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environ Sci Policy 11:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turnpenny JR, Haxeltine A, O’Riordan T (2004) A scoping study of user needs for integrated assessment of climate change in the UK context: part 1 of the development of an interactive integrated assessment process. Integrated Assessment 4:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2009) Copenhagen accord. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/application/pdf/cop15_cph_auv.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2010
  33. van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Res 31:12.1–12.33Google Scholar
  34. Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko G (2007) Linking vulnerability, adaptation and resilience science to practice: players, pathways and partnerships. Glob Environ Change 17:349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Mastrandrea
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicole E. Heller
    • 2
  • Terry L. Root
    • 1
  • Stephen H. Schneider
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Woods Institute for the EnvironmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Climate CentralPalo AltoUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations