Climatic Change

, Volume 105, Issue 3–4, pp 383–385 | Cite as

Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble

An editorial comment


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the 4th assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 996Google Scholar
  2. Robock A (2008a) 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bull Atomic Scientists 64(2):14–18, 59. doi: 10.2968/064002006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Robock A (2008b) Whither geoengineering? Science 320:1166–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Robock A, Marquardt AB, Kravitz B, Stenchikov G (2009) The benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 36:L19703. doi: 10.1029/2009GL039209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Seitz R (2011) Bright water: hydrosols, water conservation and climate change. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9965-8 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations