Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 102, Issue 3–4, pp 521–538 | Cite as

Estimated impacts of climate warming on California’s high-elevation hydropower

  • Kaveh MadaniEmail author
  • Jay R. Lund
Open Access
Article

Abstract

California’s hydropower system is composed of high and low elevation power plants. There are more than 150 high-elevation power plants, at elevations above 1,000 feet (300 m). Most have modest reservoir storage capacities, but supply roughly 74% of California’s in-state hydropower. The expected shift of runoff peak from spring to winter due to climate warming, resulting in snowpack reduction and increased snowmelt, might have important effects on power generation and revenues in California. The large storage capacities at low-elevation power plants provide flexibility to operations of these units under climate warming. However, with climate warming, the adaptability of the high-elevation hydropower system is in question as this system was designed to take advantage of snowpack, a natural reservoir. With so many high-elevation hydropower plants in California, estimation of climate warming effects by conventional simulation or optimization methods would be tedious and expensive. An Energy-Based Hydropower Optimization Model (EBHOM) was developed to facilitate practical climate change and other low-resolution system-wide hydropower studies, based on the historical generation data of 137 high-elevation hydropower plants for which the data were complete for 14 years. Employing recent historical hourly energy prices, the model was used to explore energy generation in California for three climate warming scenarios (dry warming, wet warming, and warming-only) over 14 years, representing a range of hydrologic conditions. The system is sensitive to the quantity and timing of inflows. While dry warming and warming-only climate changes reduce average hydropower revenues, wet warming could increase revenue. Re-operation of available storage and generation capacities help compensate for snowpack losses to some extent. Storage capacity expansion and to a lesser extent generation capacity expansion both increase revenues, although such expansions might not be cost-effective.

Keywords

Climate Warming Energy Price Capacity Expansion Water Resour Plan Manage Hydropower System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguado E, Cayan D, Riddle L, Roos M (1992) Climate fluctuations and the timing of west coast streamflow. J Climate 5:1468–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspen Environmental Group, Cubed M (2005) Potential changes in hydropower production from global climate change in California and the western United States. California Climate Change Center, CEC-700-2005-010, June 2005 (http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-700-2005-010/CEC-700-2005-010.PDF)
  3. Brekke LD, Miller NL, Bashford KE, Quinn NWT, Dracup JA (2004) Climate change impacts uncertainty for water resources in the San Joaquin River Basin, California. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(1):149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. California ISO OASIS (2009) Hourly average energy prices. California Independent System Operator (ISO) Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS). http://oasis.caiso.com/. Accessed May 2009
  5. Carpenter TM, Georgakakos KP (2001) Assessment of Folsom lake response to historical and potential future climate scenarios: 1. Forecasting. J Hydrol 249:148–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cayan DR, Riddle LG, Aguado E (1993) The influence of precipitation and temperature on seasonal streamflow in California. Water Resour Res 29(4):1127–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CDWR (California Department of Water Resources) (1998) The California water plan update; bulletin, vol 1. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, pp 160–198Google Scholar
  8. Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (1995) Large-scale atmospheric forcing of recent trends toward early snowmelt runoff in California. J Climate 8(3):606–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Meyer MK, Jeton AE (2004) Simulated hydrologic responses to climate variations and change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099. Clim Change 62:283–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gleick PH, Chalecki EL (1999) The impact of climatic changes for water resources of the Colorado and Sacramento–San Joaquin river systems. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35(6):1429–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glieck PH (2000) The report of the water sector assessment team of the National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  12. Haston L, Michaelsen J (1997) Spatial and temporal variability of Southern California precipitation over the last 400 yr and relationships to atmospheric circulation patterns. J Climate 10(8):1836–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 881 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Lettenmaier DP, Gan TY (1990) Hydrologic sensitivity of the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Basin, California, to global warming. Water Resour Res 26(1):69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lettenmaier DP, Sheer DP (1991) Climatic sensitivity of California water resources. J Water Resour Plan Manage 117(1):108–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lund JR, Zhu T, Jenkins MW, Tanaka S, Pulido M, Taubert M, Ritzema R, Ferriera I (2003) Climate warming & California’s water future. Appendix VII, California Energy Commission: Sacramento, pp 1–251. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2003-10-31_500-03-058CF_A07.PDF
  17. Madani K, Lund JR (2007) Aggregated modeling alternatives for modeling California’s high-elevation hydropower with climate change in the absence of storage capacity data. Hydrol Sci Technol 23(1–4):137–146Google Scholar
  18. Madani K, Lund JR (2009) Modeling California’s high-elevation hydropower systems in energy units. Water Resour Res 45:W09413. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madani K, Vicuna S, Lund J, Dracup J, Dale L (2008) Different approaches to study the adaptability of high-elevation hydropower systems to climate change: the case of SMUD’s upper american river project. In: Babcock RW, Walton R (eds) Proceeding of the 2008 world environmental and water resources congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. ASCEGoogle Scholar
  20. Medellín-Azuara J, Harou JJ, Olivares MA, Madani K, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Tanaka SK, Jenkins MW, Zhu T (2008) Adaptability and adaptations of California’s water supply system to dry climate warming. Clim Change 87(Suppl 1):S75–S90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meko DM, Therrell MD, Baisan CH, Hughes MK (2001) Sacramento river flow reconstructed to A.D. 869 from tree rings. J Water Resour Plan Manage (JAWRA) 37(4):1029–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller NL, Bashford KE, Strem E (2003) Potential impacts of climate change on California hydrology. J Water Resour Plan Manage 39(4):771–784Google Scholar
  23. Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2006) www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/about
  24. Snyder MA, Bell JL, Sloan LC, Duffy PB, Govindasamy B (2002) Climate responses to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide for a climatically vulnerable region. Geophys Res Lett 29(11):L04806. doi: 10.1029/2001GL014431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stine S (1994) Extreme and persistent drought in California and Patagonia during medieval time. Nature 369:546–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanaka ST, Zhu T, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Jenkins MW, Pulido MA, Tauber M, Ritzema RS, Ferreira IC (2006) Climate warming and water management adaptation for California. Clim Change 76(3–4):361–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. VanRheenen NT, Wood AW, Palmer RN, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Potential implications of PCM climate change scenarios for Sacramento–San Joaquin River Basin hydrology and water resources. Clim Change 62(1–3):257–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vicuña S, Dracup JA, Dale L (2009) Climate change impacts on the operation of two high elevation hydropower systems in California. California climate change center, CEC-500-2009-019-D. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2009publications/CEC-500-2009-019/CEC-500–2009-019-D.PDF. Accessed March 2009
  29. Vicuña S, Leonardson R, Hanemann MW, Dale LL, Dracup JA (2008) Climate change impacts on high elevation hydropower generation in California’s Sierra Nevada: a case study in the upper american river. Clim Change 28(Supplement 1):123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu T, Jenkins MW, Lund JR (2005) Estimated impacts of climate warming on California water availability under twelve future climate scenarios. J Water Resour Plan Manage (JAWRA) 41(5):1027–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations