Estimated impacts of climate warming on California’s high-elevation hydropower
- 2.2k Downloads
California’s hydropower system is composed of high and low elevation power plants. There are more than 150 high-elevation power plants, at elevations above 1,000 feet (300 m). Most have modest reservoir storage capacities, but supply roughly 74% of California’s in-state hydropower. The expected shift of runoff peak from spring to winter due to climate warming, resulting in snowpack reduction and increased snowmelt, might have important effects on power generation and revenues in California. The large storage capacities at low-elevation power plants provide flexibility to operations of these units under climate warming. However, with climate warming, the adaptability of the high-elevation hydropower system is in question as this system was designed to take advantage of snowpack, a natural reservoir. With so many high-elevation hydropower plants in California, estimation of climate warming effects by conventional simulation or optimization methods would be tedious and expensive. An Energy-Based Hydropower Optimization Model (EBHOM) was developed to facilitate practical climate change and other low-resolution system-wide hydropower studies, based on the historical generation data of 137 high-elevation hydropower plants for which the data were complete for 14 years. Employing recent historical hourly energy prices, the model was used to explore energy generation in California for three climate warming scenarios (dry warming, wet warming, and warming-only) over 14 years, representing a range of hydrologic conditions. The system is sensitive to the quantity and timing of inflows. While dry warming and warming-only climate changes reduce average hydropower revenues, wet warming could increase revenue. Re-operation of available storage and generation capacities help compensate for snowpack losses to some extent. Storage capacity expansion and to a lesser extent generation capacity expansion both increase revenues, although such expansions might not be cost-effective.
KeywordsClimate Warming Energy Price Capacity Expansion Water Resour Plan Manage Hydropower System
- Aspen Environmental Group, Cubed M (2005) Potential changes in hydropower production from global climate change in California and the western United States. California Climate Change Center, CEC-700-2005-010, June 2005 (http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-700-2005-010/CEC-700-2005-010.PDF)
- California ISO OASIS (2009) Hourly average energy prices. California Independent System Operator (ISO) Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS). http://oasis.caiso.com/. Accessed May 2009
- CDWR (California Department of Water Resources) (1998) The California water plan update; bulletin, vol 1. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, pp 160–198Google Scholar
- Glieck PH (2000) The report of the water sector assessment team of the National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 881 ppGoogle Scholar
- Lund JR, Zhu T, Jenkins MW, Tanaka S, Pulido M, Taubert M, Ritzema R, Ferriera I (2003) Climate warming & California’s water future. Appendix VII, California Energy Commission: Sacramento, pp 1–251. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2003-10-31_500-03-058CF_A07.PDF
- Madani K, Lund JR (2007) Aggregated modeling alternatives for modeling California’s high-elevation hydropower with climate change in the absence of storage capacity data. Hydrol Sci Technol 23(1–4):137–146Google Scholar
- Madani K, Vicuna S, Lund J, Dracup J, Dale L (2008) Different approaches to study the adaptability of high-elevation hydropower systems to climate change: the case of SMUD’s upper american river project. In: Babcock RW, Walton R (eds) Proceeding of the 2008 world environmental and water resources congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. ASCEGoogle Scholar
- Miller NL, Bashford KE, Strem E (2003) Potential impacts of climate change on California hydrology. J Water Resour Plan Manage 39(4):771–784Google Scholar
- Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2006) www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/about
- Vicuña S, Dracup JA, Dale L (2009) Climate change impacts on the operation of two high elevation hydropower systems in California. California climate change center, CEC-500-2009-019-D. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2009publications/CEC-500-2009-019/CEC-500–2009-019-D.PDF. Accessed March 2009
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.