Climatic Change

, Volume 101, Issue 3–4, pp 339–385 | Cite as

Safe climate policy is affordable—12 reasons

Open Access
Article

Abstract

There is a widespread sense that a sufficiently stringent climate mitigation policy, that is, a considerable reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to avoid extreme climate change, will come with very high economic costs for society. This is supported by many cost–benefit analyses (CBA) and policy cost assessments of climate policy. All of these, nevertheless, are based on debatable assumptions. This paper will argue instead that safe climate policy is not excessively expensive and is indeed cheaper than suggested by most current studies. To this end, climate CBA and policy cost assessments are critically evaluated, and as a replacement twelve complementary perspectives on the cost of climate policy are offered.

References

  1. Ackerman F, Finlayson IJ (2007) The economics of inaction on climate change: a sensitivity analysis. Climate Policy 6(5):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman F, DeCanio SJ, Howarth RB, Sheeran K (2009) Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change. Clim Change 95:297–315. http://www.springerlink.com/content/c85v5581x7n74571/fulltext.pdf Google Scholar
  3. Alcamo J, Shaw R, Hordijk L (eds) (1990) The RAINS model of acidification. In: Science and strategies in Europe. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson K, Bows A (2008) Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends. Philos Trans R Soc A 366(1882):3863–3882Google Scholar
  5. Arrow KJ (1973) Rawls’s principle of just saving. Swed J Econ 75:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow KJ (2007) Global climate change: a challenge to policy. The Economists’ voice 4(3):Article 2. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol4/iss3/art2
  7. Arrow KJ, Fisher AC (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Q J Econ 88(2):312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayres RU, Walters J (1991) Greenhouse effects: damages, costs and abatement. Environ Resour Econ 1:237–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azar C (1998) Are optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? Four critical issues for economists in the greenhouse. Environ Resour Econ 11(3–4):301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Azar C, Lindgren K (2003) Catastrophic events and stochastic cost–benefit analysis of climate change. Clim Change 56(3):245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Azar C, Schneider SH (2002) Are the economic costs of stabilising the atmosphere prohibitive? Ecol Econ 42:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Azar C, Schneider SH (2003) Are the economic costs of stabilising the atmosphere prohibitive? A response to Gerlagh and Papyrakis. Ecol Econ 46:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bala G, Caldeira K, Mirin A, Wickett M, Delire C (2005) Multicentury changes in global climate and carbon cycle: results from a coupled climate and carbon cycle model. J Clim 18:4531–4544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barker T (1996) A review of managing the global commons: the economics of global change, by WD Nordhaus. Energy Environ 7(1):85–88Google Scholar
  15. Barker T, Köhler J, Villena M (2002) The costs of greenhouse gas abatement: a meta-analysis of post-SRES mitigation scenarios. Environ Econ Policy Stud 5:135–166Google Scholar
  16. Barker T, Qureshi MS, Köhler J (2006) The costs of greenhouse gas mitigation with induced technical change: a meta-analysis of estimates in the literature. Report prepared for the HM Treasury Stern review on the economics of climate change. Available at www.sternreview.org.uk, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, UK
  17. Barrett S (2007) Proposal for a new climate change treaty system. The Economists’ voice 4(3):Article 6. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol4/iss3/art6
  18. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88(7–8):1359–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bollen JC, Manders AJG, Veenendaal PJJ (2004) How much does a 30% reduction cost? Macro-economic effects of post-Kyoto climate policy. CPB document 64, RIVM rapport 500035001Google Scholar
  21. Botzen W, van den Bergh JCJM (2008) Insurance against climate change and flooding in The Netherlands: present, future and comparison with other countries. Risk Anal 28(2):413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Botzen W, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Bounded rationality, climate risks and insurance: is there a market for natural disasters? Land Econ 85(2):266–279Google Scholar
  23. Botzen WJW, Gowdy JM, van den Bergh JCJM (2008) Cumulative CO2 emissions: shifting international responsibilities for climate debt. Climate Policy 8:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Botzen WJW, van den Bergh JCJM, Bouwer LM (2009) Climate change and increased risk for the insurance sector: a global perspective and an assessment for The Netherlands. Nat Hazards. http://www.springerlink.com/content/u237166571587l12/fulltext.pdf
  25. Brekke KA, Howarth RB (2002) Status, growth and the environment: goods as symbols in applied welfare economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  26. Brekke KA, Johansson-Stenman O (2008) The behavioural economics of climate change. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):280–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brereton F, Clinch JP, Ferreira S (2008) Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecol Econ 65(2):386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White House Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Bryden H, Longwort H, Cunningham S (2005) Slowing of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 25° N. Nature 438:655–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Brzoska M (2008) Trends in global military and civilian (R&D) and their changing interface. Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy, University of Hamburg. Available at: http://www.ifsh.de/pdf/aktuelles/india_brzoska.pdf
  31. Chichilnisky G (1996) An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Soc Choice Welf 13(2):219–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Clark AE, Frijters P, Shields MA (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility. J Econ Lit 46(1):95–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cline WR (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Cline WR (2007) Comments on the Stern Review. In: Yale symposium on the Stern Review, chapter 6. http://www.ycsg.yale.edu/climate/forms/FullText.pdf
  35. Cohen MD (1995) Risk aversion in concepts in expected- and non-expected-utility models. Geneva Pap Risk Insur, Theory 20:73–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cohen MA, Vandenbergh MP (2008) Consumption, happiness, and climate change. RFF discussion paper 08–39, Oct 2008. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA, Ehrlich AH (1991) Greenhouse economics: learn before you leap. Ecol Econ 4:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Daly HE (1977) Steady-state economics. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  39. Daly HE, Cobb J (1989) For the common good: redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Dasgupta P (2001) Human well-being and the natural environment. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dasgupta P (2007) Commentary: the Stern Review’s economics of climate change. Natl Inst Econ Rev 199:4–7Google Scholar
  42. Dasgupta P, Maskin E (2005) Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. Am Econ Rev 95(4):1290–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Davidson MD (2006) A social discount rate for climate damage to future generations based on regulatory law. Clim Change 76(1–2):55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. de Groot HLF, Nahuis R, Tang PJG (2004) Is the American model miss world? Choosing between the Anglo-Saxon model and a European-style alternative. CPB discussion paper 40, Centraal Planbureau, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  45. de Mooij RA (1999) The double dividend of an environmental tax reform. In: van den Bergh JCJM (ed) Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  46. DeCanio SJ (1998) The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy 26(5):441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. DeCanio SJ (2003) Economic models of climate change: a critique. Palgrave-Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Diecidue E, Wakker PP (2001) On the intuition of rank-dependent utility. J Risk Uncertain 23(3):281–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dietz S, Anderson D, Stern N, Taylor C, Zenghelis D (2007) Right for the right reasons: a final rejoinder on the Stern Review. World Econ 8(2):229–258Google Scholar
  50. Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David PA, Reder MW (eds) Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Easterlin RA (2001) Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Econ J 111:465–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289(5487):2068–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. EIA (2008) Annual energy outlook 2008. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/
  54. Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ (1996) Climate change costs–recent advancements in the economic assessment. Energy Policy 24:665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ (1997) The social costs of climate change: the IPCC second assessment report and beyond. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 1:385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2005) Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J Public Econ 89(5–6):997–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Frijters P (2004) How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J 114:641–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Gowdy JM (2008) Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecol Econ 60(3):509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Fisher C, Morgenstern RD (2006) Carbon abatement costs: why the wide range of estimates? Energy J 27(2):73–86Google Scholar
  61. Fouquet R, Pearson PJG (2006) Seven centuries of energy services: the price and use of light in the United Kingdom (1300–2000). Energy J 27(1):139–177Google Scholar
  62. Frank RH (1985) Choosing the right pond: human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Frank RH (2004) Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. Am Econ Rev 95(2):137–141Google Scholar
  64. Frederick S, Loewenstein G (1999) Hedonic adaptation. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwartz N (eds.) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 302–329Google Scholar
  65. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40:351–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40:402–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Frijters P, van Praag BMS (1998) The effects of climate on welfare and wellbeing in Russia. Clim Change 39:61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Frondel M, Peters J, Vance C (2008) Identifying the rebound: evidence from a German household panel. Energy J 29(4):145–163Google Scholar
  69. Fudenberg D, Levine DM (2006) A dual-self model of impulse control. Am Econ Rev 96:1449–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Funtowicz S, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the postnormal age. Futures 25:739–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Geels FW (2005) Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  72. Gollier C, Jullien B, Treich N (2000) Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the precautionary principle. J Public Econ 75:229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Gowdy JM (2008) Behavioral economics and climate change policy. J Econ Behav Organiz 68:632–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Green DL, Leiby PN (1993) The social costs to the US of monopolization of the world oil market 1972–1991. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report 6744, Oak Ridge, TNGoogle Scholar
  75. Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect: a survey. Energy Policy 28:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Guo JK, Hepburn C, Tol RSJ, Anthoff D (2006) Discounting and the social cost of carbon: a closer look at uncertainty. Environ Sci Policy 9(5):203–216Google Scholar
  77. Ha-Duong M (1998) Quasi-option value and climate policy choices. Energy Econ 20(5–6):599–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Harrington W, Morgenstern RD, Nelson P (1999) On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  79. Hartley K (2006) The costs of war. Centre for Defence Economics, The University of York, UK. http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/econ/documents/research/iraq_conflict_vox_june2006.pdf
  80. Hawellek J, Kemfert C, Kremers H (2007) A quantitative comparison of economic cost assessments implementing the Kyoto protocol. Department of Economics and Statistics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, OldenburgGoogle Scholar
  81. HEAL (2008) The co-benefits to health of a strong EU climate change policy. Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-E) and WWF. Available at http://www.climnet.org/Co-benefits%20to%20health%20report%20-september%202008.pdf
  82. Heal G, Kriström B (2002) Uncertainty and climate change. Environ Resour Econ 22(1–2):3–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Helliwell J (2003) How’s life? Combining individual and national variations to explain subjective well-being. Econ Model 20:331–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Hirsch F (1976) Social limits to growth. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  85. Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  86. Hueting R (1974) Nieuwe Schaarste and Economische Groei. Elsevier, Amsterdam (English edition 1980, New Scarcity and Economic Growth, North-Holland, Amsterdam)Google Scholar
  87. IPCC (2007) Fourth assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  88. Ireland NJ (2001) Optimal income tax in the presence of status effects. J Public Econ 81:193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Jaccard M, Nyboer J, Bataille C, Sadownik B (2003) Modeling the cost of climate policy: distinguishing between alternative cost definitions and long-run cost dynamics. Energy J 24(1):49–73Google Scholar
  90. Johansson P-O (1987) The economic theory and measurement of environmental benefits. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  91. Jorgenson DW, Goettle RJ, Wilcoxen PJ, Ho MS (2008) The economic costs of a market-based climate policy. DW Jorgenson Associates for Pew Center on Global Climate Change, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  92. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kahneman D, Krueger A, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone A (2004) Toward national well-being accounts. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 94:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Kasting J (1998) The carbon cycle, climate, and the long-term effects of fossil fuel burning. Consequences 4:15–27Google Scholar
  95. Kelly DL, Kolstad CD (1999) Integrated assessment models for climate change control. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 1999/2000. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  96. Kimball MS (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58:53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Kolstad C (1996) Learning and stock effects in environmental regulations: the case of greenhouse gas emissions. J Environ Econ Manage 31:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kuik O, Brander L, Tol RSJ (2008) Marginal abatement costs of carbon-dioxide emissions: a meta-analysis. ESRI working paper no 248, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  99. Kump L (2002) Reducing uncertainty about carbon dioxide as a climate driver. Nature 419:188–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Laitner JA, DeCanio SJ, Peters I (2000) Incorporating behavioural, social, and organizational phenomena in the assessment of climate change mitigation options. In: Jochem E, Sathaye J, Bouille D (eds) Society, behaviour, and climate change mitigation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–64Google Scholar
  101. Lawn P, Clarke M (2008) Sustainable welfare in the Asia-Pacific: studies using the genuine progress indicator. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  102. Layard R (2005) Happiness: lessons from a new science. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. Llavador H, Roemer JE, Silvestre J (2008) Dynamic analysis of human welfare in a warming planet. Cowles Foundation discussion paper no 1673, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  104. Loulou R, Kanudia A (1999) Minimax regret strategies for greenhouse gas abatement: methodology and application. Oper Res Lett 25:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Lubowski RN (2008) The role of REDD in stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations: lessons from economic models. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/globalredd
  106. Luechinger S (2007) Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=res2008&paper_id=680
  107. Lynas M (2007) Six degrees: our future on a hotter planet. Fourth Estate/HarperCollins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  108. MacLeod M, Ekins P, Vanner R, Moran D (eds) (2009) Understanding the costs of environmental regulation in Europe. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  109. Maddison DJ (2003) The amenity value of the climate: the household production function approach. Resour Energy Econ 25:155–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Maréchal K (2007) The economics of climate change and the change of climate in economics. Energy Policy 35:5181–5194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Margolis RM, Kammen DM (1999) Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challenge. Science 285(5428):690–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Matthews HD, Caldeira K (2008) Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. McKibbin WJ, Wilcoxen PJ (2002) The role of economics in climate change policy. J Econ Perspect 16(2):107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. McKinsey & Company (2009). Pathways to a low-carbon economy. New York. https://solutions.mckinsey.com/climatedesk/CMS/Default.aspx
  116. Meinshausen M (2006) What does a 2°C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? A brief analysis based on multi-gas emission pathways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  117. Messner S (1997) Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model. J Evol Econ 7:291–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Mishan EJ (1967) The cost of’ economic growth. Staples, LondonGoogle Scholar
  119. Montenegro A, Brovkin V, Eby M, Archer D, Weaver AJ (2007) Long term fate of anthropogenic carbon. Geophys Res Lett 34:L19707. doi:10.1029/2007GL030905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Nemet GF (2008) Interpreting interim deviations from cost projections for publicly supported energy technologies. Working paper no 2008-012, La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin, Madison. http://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workingpapers
  121. Neuhoff K (2006) Where can international cooperation support domestic climate policy? EPRG working paper 06/27, Faculty of Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  122. Neumayer E (1999) Global warming: discounting is not the issue, but substitutability is. Energy Policy 27:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Ng Y-K (2003) From preference to happiness: towards a more complete welfare economics. Soc Choice Welf 20:307–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Nordhaus WD (1977) Economic growth and climate: the case of carbon dioxide. Am Econ Rev 67(1):341–346Google Scholar
  125. Nordhaus WD (1991) To slow or not to slow? The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101:920–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Nordhaus WD (2007) Comments on the Stern review. In: Yale symposium on the Stern review, chapter 5. http://www.ycsg.yale.edu/climate/forms/FullText.pdf
  127. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. The MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  128. Nordhaus WD, Tobin J (1972) Is growth obsolete? Economic Growth. 50th anniversary colloquium V. In: Moss M (ed) Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, New York. Reprinted in The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, Studies in Income and Wealth, vol 38. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1973Google Scholar
  129. OECD (2006) Going for growth. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  130. OECD (2008) OECD in figures 2007. OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/infigures
  131. Padilla E (2004) Climate change, economic analysis and sustainable development. Environ Values 13:523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Patuellia R, Nijkamp P, Pels E (2005) Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: a meta-analytical performance assessment. Ecol Econ 55(4):564–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. PBL (2008) Milieubalans 2008. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  134. Polimeni JM, Mayumi K, Giampietro M, Alcott B (2008) The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  135. Prins G, Rayner S (2007) Time to ditch Kyoto. Nature 449:973–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Quiggin J (2008) Stern and his critics on discounting and climate change: an editorial essay. Clim Change 89(3–4):195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Rawls J (1972) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  138. Rehdanz K, Maddison DJ (2004) The amenity value of climate to German households. FEEM working paper no 57.04, March 2004, FEEM, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  139. Rehdanz K, Maddison DJ (2005) Climate and happiness. Ecol Econ 52:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Reilly J, Stone PH, Forest CE, Webster MD, Jacoby HD, Prinn RG (2001) Uncertainty and climate change assessments. Science 293(5529):430–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Repetto R, Austin D (1997) The costs of climate protection: a guide for the perplexed. World Resources Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  142. Rind D (1999) Complexity and climate. Science 284(5411):105–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Roberts S (2008) Energy, equity and the future of the fuel poor. Energy Policy 36(12):4471–4474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Roland A (2001) The military-industrial complex. American Historical Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  145. Royal Society (2005) Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Policy document 12/05. www.royalsoc.ac.uk/displaypagedoc.asp?id=13539
  146. Sagar AD, van der Zwaan B (2006) Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy 34:2601–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Sandén BA, Azar C (2005) Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches. Energy Policy 33:1557–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Schimmelpfennig D (1995) The option value of renewable energy: the case of climate change. Energy Econ 17(4):311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Schock RN, Fulkerson W, Brown ML, San Martin RL, Greene DL, Edmonds J (1999) How much is energy research and development worth as insurance? Annu Rev Energy Environ 24:487–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Scitovsky T (1976) The joyless economy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  151. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H (2008) Croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Sen A (1976) Real national income. Rev Econ Stud 43(1):19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Söderholm P (2007) Modelling the economic costs of climate policy. Research report 2007-17, Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Luleå University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  154. Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, London. http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/Downloads/PDF/07/0710ReboundEffect/0710ReboundEffectReport.pdf
  156. Sorrell S (2009) Jevons’ paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy 37(4):1456–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Spash CL (2002) Greenhouse economics. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Spash CL (2007) Climate change: need for new economic thought. Economic and Political Weekly 10th February, 2007, pp 483–490Google Scholar
  159. Spash CL (2008) Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV) and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Econ 84(3):469–488Google Scholar
  160. Stern N (2007) Findings of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Yale symposium on the Stern Review, chapter 1. http://www.ycsg.yale.edu/climate/forms/FullText.pdf
  161. Stern N, Peters S, Bakhshi V, Bowen A, Cameron C, Catovsky S, Crane D, Cruickshank S, Dietz S, Edmonson N, Garbett S-L, Hamid L, Hoffman G, Ingram D, Jones B, Patmore N, Radcliffe H, Sathiyarajah R, Stock M, Taylor C, Vernon T, Wanjie H, Zenghelis D (2006) Stern Review: the economics of climate change. HM Treasury, London. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_climate_change.htm. (Later published as Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
  162. Stiglitz JE, Bilmes L (2008) The three trillion dollar war: the true cost of the Iraq conflict. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  163. Tol RSJ (2005) The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33(16):2064–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Tol RSJ (2006) The Stern Review of the economics of climate change: a comment. Energy Environ 17(6):977–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Tol RSJ (2008a) The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers, and catastrophes. Economics, the open-access, open-assessment. E-Journal 2(25):1–24Google Scholar
  166. Tol RSJ (2008b) The economic impact of climate change. Working paper no 255, September 2008. Economic and Social Research Institute, DublinGoogle Scholar
  167. Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2007) A stern reply to the reply of the review of the Stern Review. World Econ 8(2):153–159Google Scholar
  168. Ulph A, Ulph D (1997) Global warming, irreversibility and learning. Econ J 107:636–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. van Beers C, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Environmental harm of hidden subsidies: global warming and acidification. AMBIO (in press)Google Scholar
  170. van den Bergh JCJM (2004) Optimal climate policy is a utopia: from quantitative to qualitative cost–benefit analysis. Ecol Econ 48:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. van den Bergh JCJM (2008a) Environmental regulation of households? An empirical review of economic and psychological factors. Ecol Econ 66:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. van den Bergh JCJM (2008b) Optimal diversity: increasing returns versus recombinant innovation. J Econ Behav Organ 68:565–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. van den Bergh JCJM (2009) The GDP paradox. J Econ Psychol 30(2):117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. van den Bergh JCJM, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Munda G (2000) Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy. Ecol Econ 32(1):43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. van den Heuvel STA, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Multilevel assessment of diversity, innovation and selection in the solar photovoltaic industry. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 20(1):50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. van der Zwaan B, Rabl A (2003) Prospects for PV: a learning curve experience. Sol Energy 74(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. van der Zwaan B, Rabl A (2004) The learning potential of photovoltaics: implications for energy policy. Energy Policy 32:1545–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. van Praag B, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2004) Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  179. Weitzman M (2001) Gamma discounting. Am Econ Rev 91(1):260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Weitzman ML (2007) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. J Econ Lit 45(3):703–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Welsch H (2006) Environment and happiness: valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecol Econ 58(4):801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Woodward RT, Bishop RC (2000) Efficiency, sustainability and global warming. Ecol Econ 14:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICREABarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Institute for Environmental Science and Technology & Department of Economics and Economic HistoryUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  3. 3.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration & Institute for Environmental StudiesVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations