Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 95, Issue 1–2, pp 53–61 | Cite as

An architecture for government action on adaptation to climate change. An editorial comment

  • Joel B. SmithEmail author
  • Jason M. Vogel
  • John E. Cromwell III
Article

Abstract

An architecture of government adaptation programs is presented. Components include leadership, institutional organization, stakeholder involvement, climate change information, appropriate use of decision analysis techniques, explicit consideration of barriers to adaptation, funding for adaptation, technology development and diffusion, and adaptation research. This architecture is a useful heuristic for identifying, evaluating, and reevaluating the needs of decision makers as they improve management of climate-sensitive resources in a changing environment.

Keywords

Climate Change Climate Change Adaptation Stakeholder Involvement Adaptation Policy Flood Insurance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloomberg MD (2007) plaNYC: a greener, greater New York, April. Available http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/downloads/pdf/full_report.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2009
  3. Broadleaf and MJA (2006) Climate change impacts & risk management: a guide for business and government. Broadleaf Capital International and Marsden Jacob Associates. Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton I, Malone E, Huq S, Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E (eds) (2004) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Council of Australian Governments (2007) National Climate Change Adaptation Framework. Available http://www.coag.gov.au/coag_meeting_outcomes/2007–04–13/docs/national_climate_change_adaption_framework.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2009
  6. de Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, van Buuren A, Graveland J, de Groot RA, Kuikman PJ, Reinhard S, Roetter RP, Tassone VC, Verhagen A, van Ierland EC (2009) Adapting to climate change in the Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9576-4 Google Scholar
  7. Governors Action Team on Energy and Climate Change (2008) Florida’s energy and climate change action plan. Available http://www.dep.state.fl.us/climatechange/team/file/phase2report08.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2009
  8. Groves DG, Lempert RJ, Knopman D, Berry SH (2008) Preparing for an uncertain future in the Inland Empire: identifying robust water management strategies. The Rand Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  9. King County (2007) King County 2007 climate plan. Available http://your.kingcounty.gov/exec/news/2007/pdf/ClimatePlan.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2009
  10. Leggett J (2007) Climate change: federal expenditures. Report RL33817. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. McNie E (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 233 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Pielke RA Jr (2005) Misdefining “climate change”: consequences for science and action. Environ Sci Policy 8:548–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Popper SW, Lempert RJ, Bankes SC (2005) Shaping the future. Sci Am 292(4):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sarewitz D, Pielke RA Jr (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarewitz D, Pielke RA Jr, Byerly R Jr (eds) (2000) Prediction: science, decision making, and the future of nature. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Stern N, Peters S, Bakhshi V, Bowen A, Cameron C, Catovsky S, Crane D, Cruickshank S, Dietz S, Edmonson N, Garbett S-L, Hamid L, Hoffman G, Ingram D, Jones B, Patmore N, Radcliffe H, Sathiyarajah R, Stock M, Taylor C, Vernon T, Wanjie H, Zenghelis D (2006) Stern review report: the economics of climate change. Her Majesty’s Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Tol RSJ (2008) The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers and catastrophes. Economics: the open-access, open-assessment E-journal 2(2008–25). Available http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008–25. Accessed 18 April 2009
  21. U.S. DOI (2008) Report of the subcommittee on law and policy. Task force on climate change. Available http://www.usgs.gov/global_change/docs/law_policy.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2009
  22. UNDP (2007) Human development report 2007/2008. Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world. United Nations Development Programme, NY. Available http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007–2008/. Accessed 18 April 2009Google Scholar
  23. UNFCCC (2007) Investment and financial flows to address climate change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn. Available http://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/application/pdf/background_paper.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2009Google Scholar
  24. Whetmore F, Bernstein G, Conrad D, DiVincenti C, Larson L, Plasencia D, Riggs R, Monday J, Robinson MF, Shapiro M (2006) An evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program: final report. American Institutes for Research, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Willows R, Connell R (eds) (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report. United Kingdom Climate Impacts Program, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel B. Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jason M. Vogel
    • 1
  • John E. Cromwell III
    • 1
  1. 1.Stratus ConsultingBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations