Climatic Change

, Volume 94, Issue 1–2, pp 189–209 | Cite as

Assessing adaptive capacity to tropical cyclones in the East coast of India: a pilot study of public response to cyclone warning information

  • Upasna SharmaEmail author
  • Anand Patwardhan
  • D. Parthasarathy


Ability to respond positively to climate hazards (also called adaptive capacity) first requires a perception of the risk due to that hazard and then formulation, evaluation and implementation of response by the exposed units with the view to reducing impacts. From a policy perspective, facilitating the process of perception of risk (and sometimes formulation, evaluation and implementation of response) often requires some kind of generation and communication of information for use by the exposed units. For example, the cyclone early warning system is a policy intervention which aims to generate and communicate information to the people about a possible cyclone occurrence, so as to facilitate timely and appropriate response such as evacuating the risk prone areas and/or taking refuge in a cyclone shelter by the people in danger. Anecdotal evidence suggests that many a time the cyclone warning message is not able to generate the desired response from the target audience. An understanding of the factors underlying the process of perception, formulation, evaluation and response by the exposed units to manage cyclone risk is required to close the gap between the desired response and the actual response by the exposed units to the warning information. In this paper we attempt to identify such factors in the Indian context. We conducted an exploratory study on the East coast of India to identify the factors that affect the perceptual and evaluative processes underlying the ‘warning-response’ process i.e. evacuation behavior of the exposed units once they have received the cyclone warning. The findings highlight some important factors that could be addressed to improve the warning-response process and hence enhance the ability of people to respond to cyclone risk.


Cyclone Tropical Cyclone Adaptive Capacity Indian Context Evacuation Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguirre B (1991) Evacuation in Cancun during hurricane Gilbert. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9(1):31–45Google Scholar
  2. Baker EJ (1979) Predicting response to hurricane warnings: a reanalysis of data from four studies. Mass Emerg 4(1):9–24Google Scholar
  3. Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9(2):287–310Google Scholar
  4. Balluz L, Schieve L, Holmes T, Kiezak S, Malilay J (2000) Predictors for people’s response to a tornado warning: Arkansas, 1 March 1997. Disasters 24(1):71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateman JM, Edwards B (2002) Gender and evacuation: a closer look at why women are more likely to evacuate for hurricanes. Natural Hazards Review 3:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dash N, Morrow BH (2001) Return delays and evacuation order compliance: the case of Hurricane Georges and the Florida keys. Environ Hazards 2:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dow K, Cutter SL (1998) Crying wolf: repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders. Coast Manage 26(4):237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drabek TE (1969) Social processes in disaster: family evacuation. Soc Probl 16:336–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischhoff B (2006) The psychological perception of risk. In: Kemlen DG (ed) The homeland security handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 463–492Google Scholar
  10. Hammer B, Schmidlin TW (2002) Response to warnings during the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornado: reasons and relative injury rates. Weather Forecast 17:577–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haque CE (1995) Climatic hazards warning process in Bangladesh: experience of, and lessons from, the 1991 April cyclone. Environ Manage 19(5):719–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IFRCRCS (2001) World disasters report (edited by Jonathan Walter). International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  13. IMD (1996) Tracks of storms and depressions in the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian sea. Indian Meteorological Department, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindell MK, Perry RW (1992) Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Mileti DS (1995) Factors related to flood warning response. U.S.–Italy research workshop on the hydrometeorology, impacts, and management of extreme floods. Perugia (Italy), November 1995Google Scholar
  17. Mileti DS, Darlington JD (1995) Societal response to revised earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 13:119–145Google Scholar
  18. Mileti DS, Fitzpatrick C (1991) Communication of public risks: its theory and its application. Sociological Practice Review, pp 20–28Google Scholar
  19. Mileti DS, O’Brien PW (1992) Warnings during disaster: normalizing communicated risk. Soc Probl 39:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mileti DS, Sorensen JH (1990) Communication of emergency public warnings: a social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TNGoogle Scholar
  21. Nigg JM (1993) Risk communication and warning systems. Series article University of Delaware. Disaster Research Center 261. Reprinted from proceedings preprint international conference on natural risk and civil protection, pp 209–236Google Scholar
  22. OXFORD (2000) Parsuraman S, Unnikrishnan PV (eds). India Disasters Report Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. Patwardhan A, Narayanan K, Parthasarathy D, Sharma U (2003) Impacts of climate change on coastal zones. In: Shukla PR, Sharna SK, Ravindranath Nh, Garg A, Bhattacharya S (eds) Climate change and India: vulnerability and adaptation. Universities Press, Hyderabad, India, pp 326–359Google Scholar
  24. Perry RW (1987) Disaster preparedness and response among minority citizens. In: Dynes RR, DeMarchi B, Pelanda C (eds) Sociology of disasters. Franco Angeli Libri, Milan, Italy, pp 135–151Google Scholar
  25. Perry RW, Greene MR, Lindell MK (1980) Enhancing evacuation warning compliance: suggestions for emergency planning. Disasters 4(4):433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quarantelli EL (with the assistance of Barbara Baisden and Timothy Bourdess) (1980) Evacuation behaviour and problems: findings and implications from the research literature. Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University. Misc. Report No. 27: Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  27. Riad JK, Norris FH (1998) Hurricane threat and evacuation intentions: an analysis of risk perception, preparedness, social influence and resources. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, NewarkGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers GO, Sorensen JH (1991) Diffusion of emergency warning: comparing empirical and simulation results. Risk Anal 11:117–134Google Scholar
  29. Rohrmann B (2000) A socio-psychological model for analyzing risk communication processes. The Australasian journal of disaster and trauma studies, 2.
  30. Seydlitz R, William Spencer J, Lundskow G (1994) Media presentations of a hazard event and the public’s response: an empirical examination. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 12:279–301Google Scholar
  31. Smit B, Pilifosova O, Burton I, Challenger B, Huq S, Klein RJT, Yohe G (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Westgate K (1978) Hurricane response and hurricane perception in the Commonwealth of the Bahamas. Mass Emerg 3:251–265Google Scholar
  33. Windham GO, Posey EI, Ross PJ, Spencer B (1977) Reaction to storm threat during hurricane Eloise. Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Upasna Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anand Patwardhan
    • 1
  • D. Parthasarathy
    • 2
  1. 1.Shailesh J. Mehta School of ManagementIndian Institute of Technology, BombayPowaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIndian Institute of Technology, BombayPowaiIndia

Personalised recommendations