Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 95, Issue 1–2, pp 195–217 | Cite as

Effects of climate warming on Olive and olive fly (Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin)) in California and Italy

  • Andrew Paul Gutierrez
  • Luigi Ponti
  • Q. A. Cossu
Article

Abstract

Climate change is expected to alter the geographic distribution and abundance of many species. Here we examine the potential effects of climate warming on olive (Olea europaea) and olive fly (Bactrocera oleae) across the ecological zones of Arizona–California (AZ–CA) and Italy. A weather-driven physiologically-based demographic model was developed from the extensive literature and used to simulate the phenology, growth and population dynamics of both species. Observed weather for several years from 151 sites in AZ–CA and 84 sites in Italy were used in the study. Three climate-warming scenarios were developed by increasing observed average daily temperature 1°, 2° and 3°C. Predictions of bloom dates, yield, total fly pupae and percent infestation were mapped using GRASS GIS. Linear multiple-regression was used to estimate the effects of weather on yield and fly abundance. Olive has a much wider temperature range of favorability than olive fly. The model predicted the present distributions of both species and gave important insights on the potential effects of climate warming on them. In AZ–CA, climate warming is expected to contract the range of olive in southern desert areas, and expand it northward and along coastal areas. Olive fly is currently limited by high temperature in the southern part of its range and by cold weather in northern areas. Climate warming is expected to increase the range of olive fly northward and in coastal areas, but decrease it in southern areas. In Italy, the range of olive is expected to increase into currently unfavorable cold areas in higher elevations in the Apennine Mountains in central Italy, and in the Po Valley in the north. Climate warming is expected to increase the range of olive fly northward throughout most of Italy.

Keywords

Olive Fruit Olea Europaea High Summer Temperature Pink Bollworm Functional Response Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Razik M (1989) A model of the productivity of olive trees under optional water and nutrient supply in desert conditions. Ecol Model 45:179–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams PA (1994) The fallacies of ratio-dependent predation. Ecology 75:1842–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The distribution and abundance of animals. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigler F (1982) Post-larval mortality of the olive fly, Dacus oleae Gmel. (Dipt., Tephritidae) in oleaster areas of western Crete. Z Angew Entomol 93:76–89Google Scholar
  5. Bigler F, Delucchi V (1981a) The main mortality factors during the prepupal development of the olive fly, Dacus oleae Gmel. (Dipt., Tephritidae) on oleasters and cultivated olives in Western Crete, Greece. Z Angew Entomol 92:343–363Google Scholar
  6. Bigler F, Delucchi V (1981b) Evaluation of the prepupal mortality of the olive fly, Dacus oleae Gmel. (Dipt., Tephritidae), on oleasters and olive trees in western Crete, Greece. Z Angew Entomol 92:189–201Google Scholar
  7. Bongi G (2002) Freezing avoidance in olive tree (Olea europaea L.): from proxies to targets of action. Adv Hort Sci 16:117–124Google Scholar
  8. Carey JR (1996) The incipient Mediterranean fruit fly population in California: implications for invasion biology. Ecology 77:1690–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coakley S, Scherm H, Chakraborty S (1999) Climate change and plant disease management. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:399–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crovetti A, Loi G, Quaglia F, Belcari A (1981) Influence of constant temperature on embryonic development of olive-fruit fly (Dacus oleae Gmel.). Frustula Entomol 17:83–91Google Scholar
  11. Crovetti A, Quaglia F, Loi G, Rossi E, Malfatti P, Chesi F, Conti B, Belcari A, Raspi A, Paparatti B (1982) Influence of temperature and humidity on the development of the immature stages of Dacus oleae (Gmelin). Frustula Entomol 5:133–166Google Scholar
  12. Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S (1998) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeBach P, Sundby RA (1963) Competitive displacement between ecological homologues. Hilgardia 34:105–166Google Scholar
  14. De Melo-Abreu JP, Barranco D, Cordeiro AM, Tous J, Rogado BM, Villalobos FJ (2004) Modelling olive flowering date using chilling for dormancy release and thermal time. Agric For Meteorol 125:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Wit CT, Goudriaan J (1978) Simulation of ecological processes. PUDOC, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Delrio G, Prota R (1988) Determinants of abundance in a population of the olive fruit-fly. Frustula Entomol 11:47–55Google Scholar
  17. Denney JO, McEachern GR, Griffiths JF (1985) Modeling the thermal adaptability of the olive (Olea europaea L.) in Texas. Agric For Meteorol 35:309Google Scholar
  18. Di Cola G, Gilioli G, Baumgärtner J (1999) Mathematical models for age-structured population dynamics. In: Huffaker CB, Gutierrez AP (eds) Ecological entomology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Drake VA (1994) The influence of weather and climate on agriculturally important insects: an Australian perspective. Aust J Agric Res 45:487–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis WN, Donner JH, Kuchlein JH (1997) Recent shifts in phenology of Microlepidoptera, related to climatic change (Lepidoptera). Entomol Berichten (Amsterdam) 57:66–72Google Scholar
  21. Fiorino P (ed) (2003) Olea: Trattato di olivicoltura. Edagricole, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  22. Fitzpatrick EA, Nix HA (1968) The climatic factor in Australian grasslands ecology. In: Moore RM (ed) Australian grasslands. Australian National University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleming RA, Candau J-N (1998) Influences of climatic change on some ecological processes of an insect outbreak system in Canada’s boreal forests and the implications for biodiversity. Environ Monit Assess 49:235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fletcher BS, Kapatos ET (1983) An evaluation of different temperature-development rate models for predicting the phenology of the olive fly Dacus oleae. Fruit flies of economic importance Proceedings of the CEC/IOBC International Symposium, Athens, Greece, 16 19 November 1982. 1983; 321 329, Rotterdam Netherlands: A.A. BalkemaGoogle Scholar
  25. Fletcher BS, Pappas S, Kapatos E (1978) Changes in the ovaries of olive flies (Dacus oleae (Gmelin)) during the summer, and their relationship to temperature, humidity and fruit availability. Ecol Entomol 3:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gao X, Giorgi F (2008) Increased aridity in the Mediterranean region under greenhouse gas forcing estimated from high resolution simulations with a regional climate model. Glob Planet Change 62:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Genç H, Nation JL (2008) Survival and development of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera: Tephritidae) immature stages at four temperatures in the laboratory. Afr J Biotechnol 7:2495–2500Google Scholar
  28. Gilioli G, Cossu A (2002) First validation of an individual-based model for the population dynamics of Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin). Atti XIX Congresso Nazionale di Entomologia, Catania, 10–15 giugno 34–39Google Scholar
  29. Girolami V (1979) Studies on the biology and population ecology of Dacus oleae (Gmelin). 1. Influence of environmental abiotic factors on the adult and on the immature stages. Redia 62:147–191Google Scholar
  30. Gutierrez AP (1992) The physiological basis of ratio dependent theory. Ecology 73:1552–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gutierrez AP (1996) Applied population ecology: a supply–demand approach. Wiley, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Gutierrez AP, Baumgärtner JU (1984) Multitrophic level models of predator–prey energetics: I. Age-specific energetics models—pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) as an example. Can Entomol 116:924–932Google Scholar
  33. Gutierrez AP, Havenstein DE, Nix HA, Moore PA (1974) The ecology of Aphis craccivora Koch and Subterranean Clover Stunt Virus in south-east Australia. II. A model of cowpea aphid populations in temperate pastures. J Appl Ecol 11:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gutierrez AP, Falcon LA, Loew W, Leipzig PA, van-den Bosch R (1975) An analysis of cotton production in California: a model for acala cotton and the effects of defoliators on its yields. Environ Entomol 4:125–136Google Scholar
  35. Gutierrez AP, Baumgärtner JU, Summers CG (1984) Multitrophic level models of predator–prey energetics: III. A case study of an alfalfa ecosystem. Can Entomol 116:950–963Google Scholar
  36. Gutierrez AP, Pitcairn MJ, Ellis CK, Carruthers N, Ghezelbash R (2005) Evaluating biological control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in California: a GIS based supply–demand demographic model. Biol Control 34:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gutierrez AP, d’Oultremont T, Ellis CK, Ponti L (2006) Climatic limits of pink bollworm in Arizona and California: effects of climate warming. Acta Oecol 30:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, d’Oultremont T, Ellis CK (2008a) Climate change effects on poikilotherm tritrophic interactions. Clim Change 87:S167–S192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gutierrez AP, Daane KM, Ponti L, Walton VM, Ellis CK (2008b) Prospective evaluation of the biological control of vine mealybug: refuge effects and climate. J Appl Ecol 45:524–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hamilton JG, Dermody O, Aldea M, Zangerl AR, Rogers A, Berenbaum MR, Delucia EH (2005) Anthropogenic changes in tropospheric composition increase susceptibility of soybean to insect herbivory. Environ Entomol 34:479–455Google Scholar
  41. Hartmann HT, Opitz KW (1980) Olive production in California. Leaflet 2474 University of California Div. Agric. Sci., Davis, USAGoogle Scholar
  42. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field C, Frumhoff P, Maurer E, Miller N, Moser S, Schneider S, Cahill K, Cleland E, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein L, Lenihan J, Lunch C, Neilson R, Sheridan S, Verville J (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12422–12427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes RD, Maywald GW (1990) Forecasting the favorableness of the Australian environment for the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Homoptera: Aphididae), and its potential impact on Australian wheat yields. Bull Entomol Res 80:165–175Google Scholar
  44. Kapatos ET, Fletcher BS (1984) The phenology of the olive fly, Dacus oleae (Gmel.) (Diptera, Tephritidae), in Corfu. Z Angew Entomol 97:360–370Google Scholar
  45. Kapatos ET, Fletcher BS (1986) Mortality factors and life-budgets for immature stages of the olive fly, Dacus oleae (Gmel.) (Diptera, Tephritidae), in Corfu. J Appl Entomol 102:326–342Google Scholar
  46. Koveos DS (2001) Rapid cold hardening in the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae under laboratory and field conditions. Entomol Exp et Appl 101:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koveos DS, Tzanakakis ME (1990) Effect of the presence of olive fruit on ovarian maturation in the olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae, under laboratory conditions. Entomol Exp et Appl 55:161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mancuso S, Pasquali G, Fiorino P (2002) Phenology modelling and forecasting in olive (Olea europaea L.) using artificial neural networks. Adv Hort Sci 16:155–164Google Scholar
  49. Maurer EP (2007) Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emissions scenarios. Clim Change 82:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meehl GA, Tebaldi C (2004) More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305(5686):994–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Messenger PS, Flitters NE (1954) Bioclimatic studies of three species of fruit flies in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 47:756–765Google Scholar
  52. Mita L, Mitasova H (2002) Spatial interpolation. University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  53. Orlandi F, Fornaciari M, Romano B (2002) The use of phenological data to calculate chilling units in Olea europaea L. in relation to the onset of reproduction. Int J Biometeorol 46:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Osborne CP, Chuine I, Viner D, Woodward FI (2000) Olive phenology as a sensitive indicator of future climatic warming in the Mediterranean. Plant, Cell & Environ 23:701–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Palese AM, Celano G, Xiloyannis C (2000) Le esigenze nutrizionali dell’olivo. Frutticoltura 62:50–53Google Scholar
  56. Pelley J (2006) Perspective: will global climate change worsen infectious diseases? Environ Sci & Tech 40:2502–2503Google Scholar
  57. Petrusewicz K, MacFayden A (1970) Productivity of terrestrial animals: principles and methods. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Proietti P, Tombesi A, Boco M (1994) Influence of leaf shading and defoliation on oil synthesis and growth of olive fruits. Acta Hort 356:272–277Google Scholar
  59. Pucci C, Forcina A, Salmistraro (1981) Effects of temperature on the death rate of larvae, pupation and activities of parasites for Dacus oleae (Gmel.). Frustula Entomol 17:143–155Google Scholar
  60. Ricci C, Ambrosi G (1981) The oviposition by Dacus oleae (Gmel.) and the size of the olives. Frustula Entomol 17:181–195Google Scholar
  61. Rice RE, Phillips PA, Stewart-Leslie J, Sibbett GS (2003) Olive fruit fly populations measured in Central and Southern California. Calif Agric 57:122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rochat J, Gutierrez AP (2001) Weather-mediated regulation of olive scale by two parasitoids. J Anim Ecol 70:476–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roffey J, Popov G (1968) Environmental and behavioural processes in Desert locust outbreaks. Nature 219:446–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saier MHJ (2007) Climate change, 2007. Water Air Soil Pollut 181:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanz-Cortés F, Martínez-Calvo J, Badenes ML, Bleiholder H, Hack H, Llácer G, Meier U (2002) Phenological growth stages of olive trees (Olea europaea). Ann Appl Biol 140:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Bottomly W (1991) From CLIMEX to PESKY, a generic expert system for risk assessment. EPPO Bulletin 21:595–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tzanakakis ME, Koveos DS (1986) Inhibition of ovarian maturation in the olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae), under long photophase and an increase of temperature. Ann Entomol Soc of Amer 79:15–18Google Scholar
  68. Vansickle J (1977) Attrition in distributed delay models. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 7:635–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Venette RC, Naranjo SE, Hutchison WD (2000) Implications of larval mortality at low temperatures and high soil moistures for establishment of pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Southeastern United States cotton. Environ Entomol 29:1018–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vitagliano C, Sebastiani L (2002) Physiological and biochemical remarks on environmental stress in olive (Olea europaea L.). Acta Hort 586:435–440Google Scholar
  71. Watt KEF (1959) A mathematical model for the effects of densities of attacked and attacking species on the number attacked. Can Entomol 91:129–144Google Scholar
  72. Williams DW, Liebhold AM (2002) Climate change and the outbreak ranges of two North American bark beetles. Agric Forest Entomol 4:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zambetaki A, Mavragani-Tsipidou P, Scouras ZG (2000) Heat shock response of Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae): genes and proteins. Ann Entomol Soc Amer 93:648–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zangheri S, Cavalloro R, Delrio G, Girolami V, Prota R, Ricci C (1976) Observations on Dacus oleae Gmelin in various regions of Italy, within the context of a coordinated programme. Atti XI Congresso Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia, Pauda, Italy, pp 429–436Google Scholar
  75. Ziska LH (2003) Evaluation of growth response of six invasive species to past, present, and future atmospheric CO2. J Exp Bot 54:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ziska LH, Teasdale JR, Bunce JA (1999) Future atmospheric CO2 may increase tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Sci 47:608–615Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Paul Gutierrez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Luigi Ponti
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Q. A. Cossu
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Ecosystem Science, ESPMUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems (CASAS)KensingtonUSA
  3. 3.ENEA, Dipartimento BAS, Gruppo “Lotta alla Desertificazione”S. Maria di Galeria (Roma)Italy
  4. 4.Servizio Agrometeorologico Regionale per la SardegnaSassariItaly
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Science, Policy & ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations