Climatic Change

, 94:351 | Cite as

How robust is the long-run relationship between temperature and radiative forcing?

  • Terence C. MillsEmail author


This paper examines the robustness of the long-run, cointegrating, relationship between global temperatures and radiative forcing. It is found that the temperature sensitivity to a doubling of radiative forcing is of the order of 2 ± 1°C. This result is robust across the sample period of 1850 to 2000, thus providing further confirmation of the quantitative impact of radiative forcing and, in particular, CO2 forcing, on temperatures.


Temperature Sensitivity Radiative Forcings Cfc11 Chow Test Transient Climate Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Brohan P, Kennedy JJ, Harris I, Tett SFB, Jones PD (2006) Uncertainty estimates in regional and global temperature changes: a new data set from 1850. J Geophys Res 111:D12106. doi:10.1029/2005 JD006548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing constancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc Ser B 39:107–113Google Scholar
  3. Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28:591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cubasch U, Meehl GA (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Houghton JT et al. (eds), Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econ 70:99–126Google Scholar
  7. IPCC (2007) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Fourth assessment report: climate change 2007. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaufmann RK, Stern DI (2002) Cointegration analysis of hemispheric temperature relations. J Geophys Res 107:D2. doi:10.1029/2000JD000174 Google Scholar
  9. Kaufmann RK, Kauppi H, Stock JH (2006a) Emissions, concentrations and temperature: a time series analysis. Clim Change 77:249–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaufmann RK, Kauppi H, Stock JH (2006b) The relationship between radiative forcing and temperature: what do statistical analyses of the instrumental temperature record measure? Clim Change 77:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacKinnon JG (1996) Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. J Appl Econ 11:601–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ploberger W, Kramer W (1992) The CUSUM test with OLS residuals. Econometrica 60:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saikkonen P (1991) Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegrating regressions. Econom Theory 7:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stern DI, Kaufmann RK (2000) Detecting a global warming signal in hemispheric temperature series: a structural time series analysis. Clim Change 47:411–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stern DI (2005) A three layer atmosphere–ocean time series model of global climate change. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  16. Stern DI (2006) An atmospheric-ocean time series model of global climate change. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:1330–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrated vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughborough, LeicsUK

Personalised recommendations