Climatic Change

, Volume 93, Issue 3–4, pp 335–354 | Cite as

Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?

  • W. Neil Adger
  • Suraje Dessai
  • Marisa Goulden
  • Mike Hulme
  • Irene Lorenzoni
  • Donald R. Nelson
  • Lars Otto Naess
  • Johanna Wolf
  • Anita Wreford
Article

Abstract

While there is a recognised need to adapt to changing climatic conditions, there is an emerging discourse of limits to such adaptation. Limits are traditionally analysed as a set of immutable thresholds in biological, economic or technological parameters. This paper contends that limits to adaptation are endogenous to society and hence contingent on ethics, knowledge, attitudes to risk and culture. We review insights from history, sociology and psychology of risk, economics and political science to develop four propositions concerning limits to adaptation. First, any limits to adaptation depend on the ultimate goals of adaptation underpinned by diverse values. Second, adaptation need not be limited by uncertainty around future foresight of risk. Third, social and individual factors limit adaptation action. Fourth, systematic undervaluation of loss of places and culture disguises real, experienced but subjective limits to adaptation. We conclude that these issues of values and ethics, risk, knowledge and culture construct societal limits to adaptation, but that these limits are mutable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger WN, Barnett J, Ellemor H (2009) Unique and valued places at risk. In: Schneider SH, Rosencranz A, Mastrandrea M (eds) Climate change science and policy. Island, Washington DC (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Agrawala S, Fankhauser S (eds) (2008) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: costs, benefits and policy instruments. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Apuuli B, Wright J, Elias C, Burton I (2000) Reconciling national and global priorities in adaptation to climate change: with an illustration from Uganda. Environ Monit Assess 61:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnell NW, Delaney EK (2006) Adapting to climate change: water supply in England and Wales. Clim Change 78:227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer P (2007) The worth of an ice-sheet: a critique of the treatment of catastrophic impacts in the Stern review. EcoEquity Discussion Paper. www.ecoequity.org/docs/WorthOfAnIceSheet.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2007
  6. Baker ARH (1992) Introduction: on ideology and landscape. In: Baker ARH, Biger G (eds) Ideology and landscape in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F (2002) Epilogue: making sense of Arctic environmental change? In: Krupnik I, Jolly D (eds) The earth is faster now: indigenous observations of arctic environmental change. Arctic Research Consortium of the United States and Smithsonian Institution, Fairbanks AK, pp 335–349Google Scholar
  9. Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2006) Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Clim Change 78:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berman M, Kofinas G (2004) Hunting for models: grounded and rational choice approaches to analyzing climate effects on subsistence hunting in an Arctic community. Ecol Econ 49:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1993) The environment as hazard, 2nd edn. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Camfield L, McGregor A (2005) Resilience and well-being in developing countries. In: Ungar M (ed) Handbook for working with children and youth: pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jager J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 100:8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multi-level world. Ecology and Society 11(2):8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/ Google Scholar
  15. Cruikshank J (2001) Glaciers and climate change: perspectives from oral tradition. Arctic 54:377–393Google Scholar
  16. Dessai S, Hulme M (2004) Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Climate Policy 4:107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dessai S, Adger WN, Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Köhler J, Warren R (2004) Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Clim Change 64:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert RJ, Pielke R Jr (2009) Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or survive. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobson A (2003) Citizenship and the environment. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dow K, Kasperson RE, Bohn H (2006) Exploring the social justice implications of adaptation and vulnerability. In: Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 79–96Google Scholar
  22. Eakin H, Tompkins EL, Nelson DR, Anderies JM (2009) Hidden costs and disparate uncertainties: trade-offs involved in approaches to climate policy. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Few R, Brown K, Tompkins E (2007) Climate change and coastal management decisions: insights from Christchurch Bay, UK. Coast Manage 35:255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischlin A, Midgeley G (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Hanson CE, van der Linden PJ (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fransson N, Gärling T (1999) Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J Environ Psychol 19:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Füssel H-M (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches and key lessons. Sustainability Science 2:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gagnon-Lebrun F, Agrawala S (2007) Implementing adaptation in developed countries: an analysis of progress and trends. Climate Policy 7:392–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gallopin GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2008) Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends Ecol Evol 23:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gow P (1995) Land, people, and paper in Western Amazonia. In: Hirsch E, O’Hanlon M (eds) The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harley TA (2003) Nice weather for the time of year: the British obsession with the weather. In: Strauss S, Orlove B (eds) Weather, climate, culture. Berg, Oxford, pp 103–120Google Scholar
  35. Henshaw A (2003) Climate and culture in the North: the interface of archaeology, paleoenvironmental science and oral history. In: Strauss S, Orlove B (eds) Weather, climate, culture. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN (1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: a meta-analysis. J Environ Educ 18:1–18Google Scholar
  37. Horton D (2005) Demonstrating environmental citizenship? In: Dobson A, Bell DR (eds) Environmental citizenship. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  38. Hulme M, Dessai S (2008) Negotiating future climates for public policy: a critical assessment of the development of climate scenarios for the UK. Environ Sci Policy 11:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hulme M, Jenkins GJ, Lu X, Turnpenny JR, Mitchell TD, Jones RG, Lowe J, Murphy JM, Hassell D, Boorman P, McDonald R, Hill S (2002) Climate change scenarios for the UK: the UKCIP02 scientific report. Tyndall, Norwich, 112 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Huntington E (1915, 2001) Civilisation and climate. Reprinted by the University Press of the Pacific, Hawaii, Hawaii, 333 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Huntington H, Fox S (2005) The changing arctic: indigenous perspectives. In: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in forty three societies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Jackson T (2005) Motivating sustainable consumption—a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. A report to the sustainable development research network. Centre for Environmental Strategies, University of SurreyGoogle Scholar
  44. Kates RW, Wilbanks TJ (2003) Making the global local: responding to climate change concerns from the ground up. Environment 45(3):12–23Google Scholar
  45. Knopman DS (2006) Success matters: recasting the relationship among geophysical, biological, and behavioral scientists to support decision making on major environmental challenges. Water Resour Res 42(3):W03S09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lempert RJ, Groves DG, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52:514–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lord CG et al (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:2098–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCarthy JJ, Canziani O, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC working group II. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. McIntosh RJ, Tainter JA, McIntosh SK (eds) (2000) The way the wind blows: climate, history and human action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Mearns LO, Hulme M, Carter TR, Lal M, Leemans R, Whetton PH (2001) Climate scenario development. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of WG1 to the IPCC third assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 739–768, 944 ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Moser SC, Dilling L (2004) Making climate hot. Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment 46(10):32–46Google Scholar
  52. Moser S, Dilling L (eds) (2007) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 549 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Neumayer E (2007) A missed opportunity: the stern review on climate change fails to tackle the issue of non-substitutable loss of natural capital. Glob Environ Change 17:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nilsson A, von Borgstede C, Biel A (2004) Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms. J Environ Psychol 24:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Norton BG (2003) Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  57. Nye M, Burgess J (2008) Promoting durable change in household waste and energy use behaviour. A research report completed for the department for environment, food and rural affairs. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Brien K (2009) Climate change and values: do changing values define the limits to successful adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  59. O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM (2000) Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Change 10(3):221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14(4):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Brien KL, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35(2):50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oliver-Smith A (1991) Involuntary resettlement, resistance, and political empowerment. J Refug Stud 4(2):132–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M (2002) Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto protocol. Science 296:1971–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oppenheimer M (2005) Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference: the role of science, the limits of science. Risk Anal 25:1399–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Orlove BS, Chiang JCH et al (2000) Forecasting Andean rainfall and crop yield from the influence of El Nino on Pleiades visibility. Nature 403:68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  68. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parry M, Arnell NW, Hulme M, Nicholls R, Livermore M (1998) Adapting to the inevitable. Nature 395:741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parson EA et al (2007) Global change scenarios: their development and use. Synthesis and assessment Product 2.1b. US Climate Science Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  71. Paton D, Millar M, Johnston D (2001) Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences. Natural Hazards 24:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Petersen AC (2006) Simulating nature: a philosophical study of computer-simulation uncertainties and their role in climate science and policy advice. Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam, 220 ppGoogle Scholar
  73. Pielke R, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D (2007) Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445:597–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61:62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pretty J (2007) The earth only endures. Earthscan, London, 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  76. Pulver S, VanDeveer S (2007) Global environmental futures interrogating the practice and politics of scenarios background paper presented at conference “Global environmental futures—interrogating the practice and politics of scenarios,” Providence, RI, March 23–24, 2007Google Scholar
  77. Rachlinski JJ (2000) The psychology of global climate change. Univ Ill Law Rev 1:299–319Google Scholar
  78. Rappaport RA (1977) Maladaptation in social systems. In: Friedman J (ed) Evolution of social systems. London, Duckworth, pp 49–71Google Scholar
  79. Riedlinger D, Berkes F (2001) Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scheffer M, Brovkin V, Cox P (2006) Positive feedback between global warming and atmospheric CO2 concentration inferred from past climate change. Geophys Res Lett 33:L10702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  82. Schneider SH, Semenov S, Patwardhan A et al (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Hanson CE, van der Linden PJ (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  83. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy JJ (ed) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC working group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 877–912Google Scholar
  84. Sobel RS, Leeson PT (2006) Government’s response to Hurricane Katrina: a public choice analysis. Public Choice 127:55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Spaargaren G, van Vliet B (2000) Lifestyle, consumption and the environment: the ecological modernisation of domestic consumption. Soc Nat Resour 9:50–76Google Scholar
  86. Stern N (2007) Economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Stoll-Kleemann S, O’Riordan T, Jaeger CC (2001) The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Glob Environ Change 11:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Strauss S, Orlove B (2003) Up in the air: the anthropology of weather and climate. In: Strauss S, Orlove B (eds) Weather, climate, culture. Berg, Oxford, pp 3–16, 307 ppGoogle Scholar
  89. Thomas DSG, Twyman C, Osbahr H, Hewitson B (2007) Adapting to climate change and variability in southern Africa: farmer responses to intra-seasonal precipitation trends in South Africa. Clim Change 83:301–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Toman M (2006) Values in the economics of climate change. Environ Values 15:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tompkins EL, Boyd E, Nicholson-Cole SA, Weatherhead K, Arnell WN, Adger WN (2005) Linking adaptation research and practice. A report submitted to DEFRA as part of the climate change impacts and adaptation cross-regional research programme. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  92. Tompkins EL, Few R, Brown K (2008) Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J Environ Manag 88:1580–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tonn B, Hemrick A, Conrad F (2006) Cognitive representations of the future: survey results. Futures 38:810–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Trudelle-Schwarz M (1996) Unravelling the Anchoring Cord: Navajo Relocation, 1974 to 1996. Am Anthropol 99(1):43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tsimplis MN, Woolf DK, Osborn TJ et al (2005) Towards a vulnerability assessment of the UK and northern European coasts: the role of regional climate variability. Philos Trans Royal Soc Math, Phys Eng Sci 363:1329–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Turner NJ, Gregory R, Brooks C, Failing L, Satterfield T (2008) From invisibility to transparency: identifying the implications. Ecol Soc 13(2):7. URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art7/ Google Scholar
  97. Vaughan DG, Marshall GJ, Connolley WM, Parkinson C, Mulvaney R, Hodgson DA, King JC, Pudsey CJ, Turner J (2003) Recent rapid regional climate warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Clim Change 60:243–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vedwan N, Rhoades RE (2001) Climate change in the Western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. Clim Res 19:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res 11(3):351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wolf J, Lorenzoni I, Few R, Abrahmson V, Raine R (2009) Conceptual and practical barriers to adaptation: an interdisciplinary analysis of vulnerability and response to heat waves in the UK. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  101. Yohe GW (2001) Mitigative capacity—the mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side. Clim Change 49:247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Young KR, Lipton JK (2006) Adaptive governance and climate change in the tropical highlands of Western South America. Clim Change 78:63–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Neil Adger
    • 1
  • Suraje Dessai
    • 2
  • Marisa Goulden
    • 3
  • Mike Hulme
    • 1
  • Irene Lorenzoni
    • 1
  • Donald R. Nelson
    • 4
  • Lars Otto Naess
    • 1
  • Johanna Wolf
    • 1
  • Anita Wreford
    • 5
  1. 1.Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Development StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  5. 5.Scottish Agricultural CollegeEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations