Climatic Change

, Volume 94, Issue 3–4, pp 275–286 | Cite as

Global cooling: increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2

Article

Abstract

Increasing urban albedo can reduce summertime temperatures, resulting in better air quality and savings from reduced air-conditioning costs. In addition, increasing urban albedo can result in less absorption of incoming solar radiation by the surface-troposphere system, countering to some extent the global scale effects of increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. Pavements and roofs typically constitute over 60% of urban surfaces (roof 20–25%, pavements about 40%). Using reflective materials, both roof and pavement albedos can be increased by about 0.25 and 0.15, respectively, resulting in a net albedo increase for urban areas of about 0.1. On a global basis, we estimate that increasing the world-wide albedos of urban roofs and paved surfaces will induce a negative radiative forcing on the earth equivalent to offsetting about 44 Gt of CO2 emissions. At ∼$25/tonne of CO2, a 44 Gt CO2 emission offset from changing the albedo of roofs and paved surfaces is worth about $1,100 billion. Furthermore, many studies have demonstrated reductions of more than 20% in cooling costs for buildings whose rooftop albedo has been increased from 10–20% to about 60% (in the US, potential savings exceed $1 billion per year). Our estimated CO2 offsets from albedo modifications are dependent on assumptions used in this study, but nevertheless demonstrate remarkable global cooling potentials that may be obtained from cooler roofs and pavements.

References

  1. Akbari H, Rose LS (2001a) Characterizing the fabric of the urban environment: a case study of metropolitan Chicago, Illinois. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-49275, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbari H, Rose LS (2001b) Characterizing the fabric of the urban environment: a case study of Salt Lake City, Utah. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBNL-47851, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbari H, Konopacki S (2005) Calculating energy-saving potentials of heat-island reduction strategies. Energy Policy 33:721–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy 70(3):295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akbari H, Rose LS, Taha H (2003) Analyzing the land cover of an urban environment using high-resolution orthophotos. Landsc Urban Plan 63:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balk D, Pozzi F, Yetman G, Deichmann U, Nelson A (2004) The distribution of people and the dimension of place: methodologies to improve the global estimation of urban extents. Online at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/docs/UR_paper_webdraft1.pdf
  7. CIESIN (2007) Gridded population of the world and the global rural–urban mapping project. Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Earth Institute, Columbia University. Online at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/
  8. CRMD (2007) Cool roof material database. http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/
  9. Demographia (2007) Demographia world urban areas projections 2007 & 2020 (World Agglomerations). Demographia, PO Box 841, Belleville, Illinois 62222 USAGoogle Scholar
  10. EIA (2003) International energy outlook. Energy Information Administration, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (1997a) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res 102(D6):6831–6864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen J, Ruedy R, Lacis A, Russell G, Sato M, Lerner J, Rind D, Stone P (1997b) Wonderland climate model. J Geophys Res 102(D6):6823–6830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R et al. (2005) Efficacy of climate forcing. J Geophys Res 110:D18104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hatzianastassiou N, Matsoukas C, Fotiadi A, Pavlakis KG, Drakakis E, Hatzidimitriou D, Vardavas I (2005) Global distribution of Earth’s surface shortwave radiation budget. Atmos Chem Phys 5:2847–2867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007—the physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Chapter 7, Figure 7.4 and Section 7.3.2.1 (516–517)Google Scholar
  16. Kiehl JT, Trenberth KE (1997) Earth’s annual global mean energy budget. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78(2):197–208, FebruaryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levinson R, Berdahl P, Akbari H (2005a) Solar spectral optical properties of pigments, part I: model for deriving scattering and absorption coefficients from transmittance and reflectance measurements. Sol Energy Mater Solar Cells 89(4):319–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levinson R, Berdahl P, Akbari H (2005b) Solar spectral optical properties of pigments, part II: survey of common colorants. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 89(4):351–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levinson R, Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Gupta S (2008) Estimating the solar access of typical residential rooftops: a case study in San Jose, CA. Solar 2008. American Solar Energy Society, San Diego CA, May 3–5Google Scholar
  20. Matthews HD, Caldeira K (2008) Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. Geophys Res Lett 35:L04705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGranahan G, Marcotullio P, Bai X, Balk D, Braga T, Douglas I, Elmquist T, Rees W, Satterthwaite D, Songsore J, Zlotnik H (2005) Urban systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Chapter 27 in ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 795–825, http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.296.aspx.pdf Google Scholar
  22. Myhre et al. (1998) New estimates of radiative forcing due to well-mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys Res Let 25(14):2715–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pomerantz M, Akbari H (1998) Cooler paving materials for heat island mitigation. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, vol 9, p 135Google Scholar
  24. Pomerantz M, Akbari H, Berdahl P, Konopacki SJ, Taha H (1999) Reflective surfaces for cooler buildings and cities. Philos Mag B 79(9):1457–1476Google Scholar
  25. Pomerantz M, Akbari H, Chen A, Taha H, Rosenfeld AH (1997) Paving materials for heat island mitigation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBL-38074, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  26. Pomerantz M, Akbari H, Harvey JT (2000a) The benefits of cooler pavements on durability and visibility. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBNL-43443, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  27. Pomerantz M, Pon B, Akbari H, Chang S-C (2000b) The effect of pavement temperatures on air temperatures in large cities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBNL-43442, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose LS, Akbari H, Taha H (2003) Characterizing the fabric of the urban environment: a case study of Greater Houston, Texas. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-51448, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenfeld AH, Romm JJ, Akbari H, Pomerantz M (1998) Cool communities: strategies for heat islands mitigation and smog reduction. Energy Build 28(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taha H (2001) Potential impacts of climate change on tropospheric ozone in California: a preliminary episodic modeling assessment of the Los Angeles Basin and the Sacramento Valley. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBNL-46695, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Taha H (2002) Meteorological and air quality impacts of increased urban surface albedo and vegetative cover in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBNL-49210, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Taha H (2005) Surface modifications as a potential ozone air-quality improvement strategy in California: Part I: mesoscale modeling. Final report prepared for the California Energy Commission; available from the CEC website at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-500-2005-128/CEC-500-2005-128.PDF
  33. Taha H (2008a) Episodic performance and sensitivity of the urbanized MM5 (uMM5) to perturbations in surface properties in Houston TX. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127:193–218. doi:10.1007/s10546-007-9258-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taha H (2008b) Urban surface modification as a potential ozone air-quality improvement strategy in California: a mesoscale modeling study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127:219–239. doi:10.1007/s10546-007-9259-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taha H, Chang S-C, Akbari H (2000) Meteorological and air quality impacts of heat island mitigation measures in three U.S. Cities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBL-44222, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  36. Trenberth KE, Christy JR, Olson JG (1988) Global atmospheric mass, surface pressure, and water vapor variations. J Geophys Res 93(D9):10,925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. USGS (1999) United States Geological Survey (USGS)/University of Nebraska, Lincoln/European Commission joint research center 1-km resolution global land cover characteristics database, derived from advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) data from the period April 1992 to March 1993Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.California Energy CommissionSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations