Climatic Change

, Volume 93, Issue 3–4, pp 355–377 | Cite as

Linking local vulnerability to system sustainability in a resilience framework: two cases from Latin America

  • Hallie C. Eakin
  • Mónica B. Wehbe


Collectively, individual adjustments to environmental and economic change can have disproportionate influence on the sustainability of the broader social–environmental system in which exposure takes place. Here we focus on the specific mechanisms by which farm-level responses to globalization and environmental change feedback to affect the sustainability and resilience of the social–environment system. We use a proposal by Lambin as an analytical frame for understanding this feedback, illustrating how information, motivation and capacity collectively structure the ways in which the actions of individuals can transform regional economies and landscapes. We draw on two Latin American case studies to illustrate the collective and synergistic implications of farmers’ livelihood and land use choices for the sensitivity of the region to future market and environmental shocks, as well as for the role of the landscapes in the global carbon cycle. We argue that the potential disconnect between individual goals of livelihood security and broader aims of system sustainability can be bridged through improved governance and attention to the role of policy, individual and collective experience, and resource constraints in adaptive choice.


Argentina Glyphosate Credit Union Farm Household Glob Environ Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79:387–404Google Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Eakin H, Winkles A (2008) Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Front Ecol Environ 6. doi:10.1890/070148
  3. Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2005) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecol Soc 9(1):article 3. Available at
  4. Austin A, Piñeiro G, González-Polo M (2006) More is less: agricultural impacts on the N cycle in Argentina. Biogeochemistry 79:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacon C (2005) Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua? World Dev 33(3):497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barros V (2007) Adaptation to climate trends: lessons from the Argentine experience. In: Leary N, Adejuwon J, Barros V, Burton I, Kulkarm J, Lasco R (eds) Climate change and adaptation. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Barsky O, Gelman J (2001) Historia del agro argentino. Desde la conquista hasta fines del siglo XX. Grijalbo Mondadori Eds. Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray DB, Sanchez JLP, Murphy EC (2002) Social dimensions of organic coffee production in Mexico: lessons for eco-labeling initiatives. Soc Nat Resour 15(5):429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairns MA, Haggerty PK, Alvarez R et al (2000) Tropical Mexico’s recent land-use change: a region’s contribution to the global carbon cycle. Ecol Appl 10(5):1426–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin FSI, Peterson G, Berkes F, Callaghan TV, Angelstam P, Apps M, Beier C, Bergeron Y, Crépin AS, Danell K, Elmqvist T, Folke C, Forbes B, Fresco N, Juday G, Neimela J, Shvidencko A, Whiteman G (2004) Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. Ambio 33(6):344–349Google Scholar
  11. Conde C, Vinocur MG, Gay C, Seiler R, Estrada F (2007) Climatic threat spaces in Mexico and Argentina. In: Leary N, Adejuwon J, Barros V, Burton I, Kulkarm J, Lasco R (eds) Climate change and vulnerability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Cumming GS, Barnes G, Perz S, Schmink M, Sieving KE, Southworth J, Binford M, Holt RD, Stickler C, Van Holt T (2005) An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems 8:975–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Prada JD (2005) Economics of soil erosion and wetlands degradation: a case study from Argentina. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  14. de Prada JD, Gil HA, Hernández JL et al (2007) Análisis financiero de la política de conservación de suelos de la Provincia de Córdoba, Argentina. Anales de la XXXVIII Reunión Anual de la Asociación de Economía AgrariaGoogle Scholar
  15. Dercon S (1998) Wealth, risk and activity choice: cattle in Western Tanzania. J Dev Econ 55:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eakin H (2006) Weathering risk in rural Mexico: climatic economic and institutional change. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  17. Eakin H, Luers A (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Ann Rev Environ Res 31:365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eakin H, Tucker C, Castellanos E (2006) Responding to the coffee crisis: a pilot study of farmers’ adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. Geogr J 172:156–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eakin H, Wehbe MB, Avila C, Sánchez Torres G, Bojórquez-Tapia L (2007) Social vulnerability of farmers in Mexico and Argentina. In: Leary N, Adejuwon J, Barros V, Burton I, Kulkarm J, Lasco R (eds) Climate change and vulnerability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analysis. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox Quesada V (2004) Cuarto Informe del Gobierno. Presidencia de la Republica, Mexico, DFGoogle Scholar
  23. Fraser E (2006) Crop diversification and trade liberalization: linking global trade and local management through a regional case study. Agric Human Values 23:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gay C, Estrada F, Conde C et al (2006) Potential impacts of climate change on agriculture: a case of study of coffee production in Veracruz, Mexico. Clim Change 79(3–4):259–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hausermann H, Eakin H (2008) Producing “viable” landscapes in Central Veracruz: institutional and producer responses to the coffee commodity crisis. J Lat Am Geogr 7:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holtz-Giménez E (2002) Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: a case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring agriculture. Ecosyst Environ 93:87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kessler JJ, Rood T, Tekelenburg T, Bakkenes M (2007) Biodiversity and socioeconomic impacts of selected agro-commodity production systems. J Environ Dev 16:131–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krippner G (1997) The politics of privatization in Rural Mexico. Polit Soc 25(1):4–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LA-29 Project Team (2006) Integrated assessment of social vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and change among farmers in Mexico and Argentina. Final Report Project No. LA 29. Available at
  30. Lattuada M (2000) El crecimiento económico y el desarrollo sustentable en los pequeños y medianos productores agropecuarios argentinos de fines del siglo XX. Conferencia Electrónica sobre políticas públicas, institucionalidad y desarrollo rural en América Latina. Available at
  31. Lambin EF (2005) Conditions for sustainability of human–environment systems: information, motivation and capacity. Glob Environ Change 15:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magrin GO, Travasso MI (2002) An integrated climate change assessment from Argentina. In: Doering O III, Randolph JC, Southworth J, Pfeifer RA (eds) Effects of climate change and variability on agricultural production systems. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 193–219Google Scholar
  33. Magrin G, Gay García C, Cruz D, Giménez JC, Moreno AR, Nagy GJ, Nobre C, Villamizar A (2007) Latin America. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 581–615Google Scholar
  34. Moguel P, Toledo V (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13(1):11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muñoz-Villers LE, López-Blanco J (2008) Land use/cover changes using Landsat TM/ETM images in a tropical and biodiverse mountainous area of central-eastern Mexico. Int J Remote Sens 29:71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nepstad DC, Stickler CM, Almeida OT (2006) Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 20:1595–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nestel D (1995) Coffee in Mexico: international market, agricultural landscape and ecology. Ecol Econ 15:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nolasco M (1985) Café y Sociedad en México. Centro de Ecodesarrollo, México, DFGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Brien K, Leichenko R (2000) Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Change 10(3):221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parris PM, Kates RW (2003) Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Ann Rev Environ Res 28:559–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Change 15:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pengue WA (2005) Transgenic crops in Argentina: the ecological and social debt. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25(4):314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peretti S (1999) Competitividad de la empresa agropecuaria Argentina en la década de los ’90. In Documentos de trabajo EEA INTA Marcos Júarez, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  45. Pineda-López M, Ortiz-Ceballos G, Sánchez-Velásquez LR (2005) Los cafetales y su papel en la captura de carbono: un servicio ambiental aún no valorado en Veracruz. Madera Bosques 11(2):3–14Google Scholar
  46. Ponte S (2002) The coffee crisis. Aid policy and practice. Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  47. Rivarola A, Vinocur MG, Seiler R (2003) Coping with climate variability in central Argentina: an anlysis of farmers’ attitudes toward risk. Paper presented at the 2003 open meeting of the human dimensions of global environmental change research community. In openmeeting/downloads.html
  48. Sábato, Jorge F (1980) La pampa pródiga: Claves de una frustración. Ed. CISEA, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  49. Santoyo Cortés VH, Díaz Cárdenas S, Rodríquez Padrón B et al (1996) Sistema Agroindustrial Café en México. Chapingo, CIESTAAMGoogle Scholar
  50. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca (1995) El deterioro de las tierras en la República Argentina, Alerta Amarillo. Ministerio de Economía y Obras y Servicios Públicos de la Nación, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  51. Seiler R, Hayes M, Bressan L (2002) Using the standardized precipitation index for flood risk monitoring. Int J Climatol 22:1365–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinbach H, Alvarez R (2006) Changes in soil organic carbon contents and nitrous oxide emissions after introduction of no-till in Pampean agroecosystems. J Environ Qual 35:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Synder R (1999) Reconstructing institutions for market governance: participatory policy regimes in Mexico’s coffee sector. Institutional adaptation and innovation in rural Mexico. Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, La JollaGoogle Scholar
  54. Trigo EJ, Cap EJ (2003) The impact of the introduction of transgenic crops in Argentinean agriculture. Agbioforum 6(3):87–93Google Scholar
  55. Verner D (2006) Rural poor in rich rural areas: poverty in rural Argentina. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4096. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Viglizzo EF, Roberto ZE, Filippin MC et al (1995) Climate variability and agroecological change in the Central Pampas of Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 55(1):7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Viglizzo EF, Pordomingo AJ, Castro MG et al (2004) Scale-dependent controls on ecological functions in agroecosystems of Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vila-Aiub MM, Balbi MC, Gundel PE, Ghersa CM, Powles SB (2007) Evolution of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci 55:566–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vinocur MG, Seiler R (2006) Argentina-South of Cordoba case study region. In: Integrated assessment of social vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and change among farmers in Mexico and Argentina. Chapter 2 Final Report Project No. LA 29. Available at
  60. Vinocur MG, Seiler R, Mearns LO (2000) Forecasting the impact of climate variability on peanut crop production in Argentina. Paper presented at international forum on climate prediction, agriculture and development, Palisades, New York, International Research Institute for Climate Prediction (IRI) Publications IRI-CW/00/1, pp 189–195Google Scholar
  61. Vinocur MG, Seiler R, Mearns LO (2001) Respuestas del cultivo de maní a distintos escenarios climáticos. Rev Argent Agrometeorol 1(2):71–76Google Scholar
  62. Walker BH, Gunderson LH, Kinzig A, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Schultz L (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):art. 13 (online)Google Scholar
  63. Watts M, Bohle H (1993) The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine. Prog Hum Geogr 17:43–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wehbe MB, Maurutto C (2005) Participatory local development: importance of incorporating agriculture producers into public policy formulations towards reducing their vulnerability to climate change. Paper presented at the 6th open meeting of the human dimensions of global environmental change research community, BonnGoogle Scholar
  65. Wehbe MB, Eakin H, Seiler R, Vinocur M, Ävila C, Maurutto C, Sánchez Torres G (2007) Local perspectives on adaptation to climate change. In: Leary N, Adejuwon J, Barros V, Burton I, Kulkarm J, Lasco R (eds) Climate change and adaptation. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. World Wildlife Fund (2004) Sugar and the environment. Report Issued by World Wildlife Fund Fresh Water Programme, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  67. Young O, Berkhout F, Gallopin G et al (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Change 16:304–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Universidad Nacional de Río CuartoRío CuartoArgentina

Personalised recommendations