Climatic Change

, Volume 93, Issue 3–4, pp 407–431 | Cite as

Enteric fermentation and ruminant eructation: the role (and control?) of methane in the climate change debate

  • Andy Thorpe


Anthropogenic processes are responsible for between 55% and 70% of the estimated 600 Tg of methane that is released annually into the atmosphere, with enteric fermentation a major contributor to emissions in a number of countries. This paper therefore reviews current levels of CH4 discharges by both animal type and country, and shows how the growth or decline in national herds over the last 20 years has significantly altered the global composition of enteric emissions. As developing countries are now responsible for almost three-quarters of such emissions, this has important implications in terms of mitigation strategies—particularly as such countries are presently outside the remit of the Kyoto Protocol.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AGO (2002) Developing a strategic framework for greenhouse and agriculture: an issues paper. Accessed 25 June 2005
  2. Agterbosch S, Vermeulen W, Glasbergen P (2004) Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social-institutional setting. Energy Policy 32:2049–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AJEA (Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) (2008) Greenhouse gases and animal agriculture, vol. 48, issues 1 and 2. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra (Special Issue)Google Scholar
  4. Anastasi C, Simpson VJ (1993) Future methane emissions from animals. J Geophys Res 98:7181–7186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman DE, Eppard PJ, DeGeeter MJ, Lanza GM (1985) Responses of high-producing dairy cows to long-term treatment with pituitary somatotrophin and recombinant somatotrophin. J Dairy Sci 68:1352–1362Google Scholar
  6. Beck M, Asenova D, Dickson G (2005) Public administration, science, and risk assessment: a case study of UK bovine spongiform encephalopathy crisis. Publ Admin Rev 65(4):396–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blasing TJ, Jones S (2005) Current greenhouse gas concentrations. Accessed 24 June 2005
  8. Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br J Nutr 19:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Massé D (2004) Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Can J Anim Sci 84:319–335Google Scholar
  10. CAFOD (ND) Give a goat. Accessed 14 March 2006
  11. Cao M, Gregson K, Marshall S (1998) Global methane emission from wetlands and its sensitivity to climate change. Atmos Environ 32:3293–3299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CCFIA (Climate Change Funding Initiative in Agriculture) (2005) Greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian agriculture: narrowing the knowledge gaps.–2004%20English%20Program.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2005
  13. Clemens J, Ahlgrimm H-J (2001) Greenhouse gases from animal husbandry: mitigation options. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 60:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CNN (2005) Bush: Kyoto would hurt economy, July 1. Accessed 18 July 2005
  15. CNS News (2003) New Zealand farmers threaten rebellion over “Flatulence Tax”. 3 July,\ForeignBureaus\archive\200307\FOR20030703a.html. Accessed 9 June 2005
  16. Crutzen PJ, Aselmann I, Seiler W (1986) Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and humans. Tellus 38B:271–284Google Scholar
  17. Drennan P (2002) Greenhouse gases and their implications for agriculture. Accessed 3 June 2005
  18. EEC (1988) Large combustion plant directive. Directive 88/609/EECGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (2004) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Accessed 16 July 2005
  20. FAO (2005) World meat supplies. Accessed 7 July 2005
  21. Farm Africa (2005) Dairy goat project in Uganda. Accessed 19 April 2006
  22. Fiddes N (1991) Meat. A natural symbol. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman S (2008) Biological science, 3rd edition. Pearson, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Fung I, John J, Lerner J, Matthews E, Prather M, Steele LP, Fraser PJ (1991) Three dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J Geophys Resources D7:13033–13065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GIA (Greenhouse in Agriculture) (2008) Greenhouse in agriculture. Research Newsletter No.10, March. Accessed 2 June 2008
  26. Government of British Columbia (2008) B.C.’s revenue-neutral carbon tax. Accessed 29 May 2008
  27. Government of Canada (2000) Action plan 2000. Accessed 13 March 2006
  28. Government of Canada (2002) Climate change plan for Canada. Accessed 12 March 2006
  29. Government of Canada (2005) Moving forward on climate change: a plan for honouring our Kyoto commitment. Accessed 6 March 2006
  30. Government of Canada (2006) Sustainable development strategy 2007–2009. Accessed 23 May 2008
  31. Government of Canada (2008) Taking action to fight climate change.–03/pdf/572_eng.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2008
  32. Grainger C, Clarke T, Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, Eckard RJ (2008) Supplementation with whole cottonseed reduces methane emissions and can profitably increase milk production of dairy cows offered a forage and cereal diet. Aust J Exp Econ 48(2):73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gugele B, Strobel B, Taylor P (2002) Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe. European Environmental Agency Environmental Issue Report No.33, Accessed 10 June 2005
  34. Harding GW (1998) How much of atmospheric carbon dioxide accumulation is anthropogenic? becker/prtm320/commons/carbon3.html. Accessed 24 June 2005
  35. Hathaway-Zepeda T (2004) Qualifying Kyoto: a warming climate and a heated debate. Harvard Int Rev 26:30–33, SpringGoogle Scholar
  36. Hein R, Crutzen PJ, Heinmann M (1997) An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle. Global Biogeochem Cycles 11:43–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Horrigan L, Lawrence RS, Walker P (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 110:445–456Google Scholar
  38. Houweling S, Kaminski T, Dentener F, Lelieveld J, Heimann M (1999) Inverse modeling of methane sources and sinks using the adjoint of a global transport model. J Geophys Res 104:26137–26160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IPCC (1996) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse inventories. Accessed 19 July 2005
  40. IPCC (2000) Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories, IPCC. Available at: Last accessed 6 July 2004
  41. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis, contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse inventories. Accessed 20 May 2008
  43. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Accessed 25 March 2008
  44. Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492Google Scholar
  45. Johnson DE, Ward GM (1996) Estimates of animal methane emissions. Environ Monit Assess 42:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson DE, Johnson KA, Ward GM, Branine ME (2000) Ruminants and other animals. In: Khalil (ed) Atmospheric methane: its role in the global environment. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaimovitz D, Mertens B, Wunder S, Pacheco P (2005) Hamburger connection fuels Amazon destruction, CIPR. Accessed 24 May 2005
  48. Kempton TJ, Leng RA (1979) Protein nutrition of growing lambs.1. Responses in growth and rumen function to supplementation of a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde-treated casein. Br J Nutr 42:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krishna G, Razdan MN, Ray SN (1978) Effect of nutrition and seasonal variations on heat and methane production in Bos. Indicus. Indian J Anim Sci 48:366–370Google Scholar
  50. LA (Los Angeles) Times (2003) Getting the cows to cool it. 7 June,,1,7998794.story?coll=la-home-leftrail. Accessed 9 June 2005
  51. Lassey KR (2008) Livestock methane emission and its perspective in the global methane cycle. Aust J Exp Agric 48(2):114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lelieveld J, Crutzen P, Dentener F (1998) Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane. Tellus Ser B 50:128–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lerner J, Matthews E (1988) Methane emission from animals: a global high-resolution data base. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2(2):139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leslie M, Aspin M, Clark H (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from New Zealand agriculture: issues, perspectives and industry response. Aust J Exp Agric 48(2):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lindzen RS (1990) Some coolness concerning global warming. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 71(3):288–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lockton D (2005) Motor vehicles in the developing world: options for sustainability. Accessed 10 June 2005
  57. Mangani F (1999) Significance of selected halocarbons monitoring in air samples collected in the Terra Nova Bay Region (Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica). Antarct Sci 11(2):261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MAPA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación) (2008) Emisiones de Gases en la Ganadería (Directiva IPPC/EPER-ESPAŃA. Accessed 14 May 2008
  59. Margulis S (2004) Causes of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  60. McAllister TA, Newbold CJ (2008) Redirecting Rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust J Exp Agric 48(2):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mennell S, Murcott A, Van Otterloo AH (1992) The sociology of food and eating, diet and culture. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Migeotte MJ (1948) Spectroscopic evidence of methane in the earth’s atmosphere. Phys Rev 73:519–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Milich L (1999) The role of methane in global warming: where might mitigation strategies be focused? Glob Environ Change 9:179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mosier AR, Duxbury JM, Freney JR, Heinemeyer O, Minami K, Johnson DE (1998) Mitigating agricultural emissions of methane. Clim Change 40:39–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moss A (1992) Methane from ruminants in relation to global warming. Chem Ind 9:334–336Google Scholar
  66. Moss AR, Jouany J-P, Newbold J (2000) Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 49:231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Murray RM, Bryant AM, Leng RA (1978) Methane production in the rumen and lower gut of sheep given Lucerne chaff: effect of level of intake. Br J Nutr 39:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Myers N (1981) The hamburger connection: How Central America’s forests became North America’s hamburgers. Ambio 10:3–8Google Scholar
  69. National Geographic News (2002) New Zealand tries to cap gaseous sheep burps. May 13, Accessed 9 June 2005
  70. NCCS (2000) National climate change strategy.$FILE/. Accessed 3 May 2005
  71. NCCS (National Climate Change Strategy)—Ireland (2001) Progress report implementation of the national climate change strategy.$FILE/ccrpt2%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2006
  72. New Zealand Farmers (2003) Cow burps a political farce. 2 July, Accessed 9 June 2005
  73. Norat T, Bingham S, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Jenab M, Mazuir M, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjonneland A, Clavel F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kesse E, Boeing H, Bergmann MM, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Tountas Y, Berrino F, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Engeset D, Lund E, Skeie G, Ardanaz E, Gonzalez C, Navarro C, Quiros JR, Sanchez MJ, Berglund G, Mattisson I, Hallmans G, Palmqvist R, Day NE, Khaw KT, Key TJ, San Joaquin M, Hemon B, Saracci R, Kaaks R, Riboli E (2005) Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(12):906–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. NZCCP (New Zealand Climate Change Project) (2002) Climate change: preferred policy for the agricultural sector. Accessed 3 March 2006
  75. NZIER (2005) Climate change: a guide to domestic and international policy, NZIER working paper 2005/02. Accessed 28 June 2005
  76. Olivier JGJ, Bouwman AF, Berdowski JJM, Veldt C, Bloos JPJ, Visschedijk AJH, van der Maas CWM, Zasndveld PYJ (1999) Sectoral emission inventories of greenhouse gases for 1990 on a per country basis as well as on 1x1. Envir Sci Policy 2:241–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ramaswamy V, Boucher O, Haigh J, Hauglustaine D, Haywood J, Myhre G, Nakajima T, Shi GY, Solomon S (2001) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: IPCC, climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  78. Rosegrant MW, Leach N, Gerpacio RV (1999) Meat or wheat for the next millennium? Proc Nutr Soc 58:219–234Google Scholar
  79. SAEFL (Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape) (ND) Reduction of energy related CO2 emissions. Accessed 24 March 2005
  80. Scheehle EA, Irving WN, Kruger D (2002) Global anthropogenic methane emissions. In: van Ham et al (eds) Non-CO2 greenhouse gases: scientific understanding, control options and policy aspects. Millpress, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  81. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Bell N, Schmidt GA (2005) An emissions-based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozone. Geophys Res Lett 32:L04803. doi:10.1029/2004GL021900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shu Q, Gill HS, Hennessy DW, Leng RA, Bird SH, Rowe JB (1999) Immunisation against lactic acidosis in cattle. Res Vet Sci 67:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Simpson JR, Chang X, Miyazaki A (1994) China’s livestock and related agricultural projections to 2025. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Singhal KK, Mohini M, Jha aK, Gupta PK (2005) Methane emission estimates from enteric fermentation in Indian livestock: dry matter intake approach. Curr Sci Ind 88:119–127Google Scholar
  85. Sirohi S, Michaelowa A (2004) CDM Potential in the dairy sector in India. Hamburg Institute of International Economics Discussion Paper 273, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O (2007) Agriculture. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Thorpe A, Bennett E (2001) Globalisation and the sustainability of world fisheries: a view from Latin America. Marin Resour Econ 16:143–164Google Scholar
  88. UNFCC (ND) The Kyoto protocol. Accessed 12 February 2005
  89. Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR (2000) Methane Emissions from pastoral systems: the situation in New Zealand. Presentation given at the XVI Meeting of the Archivos Latinamericanos de Producción Animal, Montevideo, March 2000. php?id=298&article=285&mode=pdf. Accessed 16 June 2005
  90. UNEP (ND) The Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Last Accessed 24 February 2006
  91. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (ND) Greenhouse gas inventory data. Accessed 14 April 2006
  92. UNFCCC-Greece (2007) Fourth national communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Accessed 22 May 2008
  93. UNFCCC-Ireland (2007) Fourth national communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Accessed 22 May 2008
  94. UNFCCC-Spain (2007) Tercera Comunicación Nacional de Espańa: Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. Accessed 22 May 2008
  95. Van Caeseele R (2002) Climate change and agriculture. Accessed 14 May 2005
  96. Van der Honing Y, Wiemann BJ, Steg A, von Donselaar B (1981) The effect of fat supplementation of concentrates on digestion and utilization of energy by productive dairy cows. Neth J Agric Sci 29:79–92Google Scholar
  97. Verberg PH, Denier Van Der Gon HAC (2001) Spatial and temporal dynamics of methane emissions from agricultural sources in China. Glob Chang Biol 7:31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. White House (2002) President announces clear skies and global climate change initiative. 22 February, Accessed 21 June 2005
  99. Wright ADG, Kennedy P, O’Neill CJ, Toovey AF, Popovski S, Rea SM, Pimm CL, Klein L (2004) Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 22:3976–3985CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Portsmouth Business SchoolUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations