Climatic Change

, Volume 89, Issue 3–4, pp 173–194 | Cite as

The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. An editorial essay on The Stern Review

  • Terry BarkerEmail author


The problem of avoiding dangerous climate change requires analysis from many disciplines. Mainstream economic thinking about the problem has shifted with the Stern Review from a single-discipline focus on cost-benefit analysis to a new inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary risk analysis, already evident in the IPCC Third Assessment Report. This shift is more evidence of the failure of the traditional, equilibrium approach in general to provide an adequate understanding of observed behaviour, either at the micro or macro scale. The economics of the Stern Review has been accepted by governments and the public as mainstream economic thinking on climate change, when in some critical respects it represents a radical departure from the traditional treatment. The conclusions regarding economic policy for climate change have shifted from “do little, later” to “take strong action urgently, before it is too late”. This editorial sets out four issues of critical importance to the new conclusions about avoiding dangerous climate change, each of which have been either ignored by the traditional literature or treated in a misleading way that discounts the insights from other disciplines: the complexity of the global energy-economy system (including the poverty and sustainability aspects of development), the ethics of intergenerational equity, the understanding from engineering and history about path dependence and induced technological change, and finally the politics of climate policy.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackerman F (2004) Priceless benefits, costly mistakes: what’s wrong with cost–benefit analysis? Real-World Econ Rev 25:2–7Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman F, Finlayson IJ (2007) The economics of inaction on climate change: a sensitivity analysis. Climate Policy 6(5):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackerman F, Heinzerling L (2004) Priceless: on knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York, The New PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerman F, Nadal A (eds) (2004) The flawed foundations of general equilibrium: critical essays on economic theory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Akerlof G (2007) The missing motivation in macroeconomics. AEA presidential address, January 2007Google Scholar
  6. Arrow KJ (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58(4):328–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow KJ (1967) Samuelson Collected. J Polit Econ 75(5):730–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arrow KJ (2007) Global climate change: a challenge to policy economists, economists’ voice. Cited June
  9. Arrow KJ, Cline W, Maler KJ, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz J (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate change 1995—economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–44Google Scholar
  10. Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  11. Azar C, Lindgren K (2003) Catastrophic events and stochastic cost–benefit analysis of climate change. Clim Change 56:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baer P, Mastrandrea M (2006) High stakes designing emissions pathways to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. IPPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Barker T (1996a) Essay review: a review of managing the global commons: the economics of global change, by William D Nordhaus. Energy Environ 7(1):85–88Google Scholar
  14. Barker T (1996b) Space–time economics. Cambridge Econometrics, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Barker T (1998) The use of energy-environment-economy models to inform greenhouse gas mitigation policy. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 16(2):133–131Google Scholar
  16. Barker T, Pan H, Köhler J, Warren R, Winne S (2006) Decarbonizing the global economy with induced technological change: scenarios to 2100 using E3MG. Energy J 27:241–258Google Scholar
  17. Barker T, Qureshi MS, Koehler J (2006) The costs of greenhouse-gas mitigation with induced technological change: a meta-analysis of estimates in the literature. 4CMR, Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Barker T, Jenkins K (2007) The costs of avoiding dangerous climate change: estimates derived from a meta-analysis of the literature. A briefing paper for the United Nations Human Development Report 2007Google Scholar
  19. Barker TI, Bashmakov A, Alharthi M, Amann L, Cifuentes J, Drexhage M, Duan O, Edenhofer B, Flannery M, Grubb M, Hoogwijk FI, Ibitoye CJ, Jepma WA, Pizer K, Yamaji ‘Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective’ Chapter 11 in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Beinhocker E (2006) The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity and the radical remaking of economics. Random House Business Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Boulding K (1992) Towards a new economics. Edward Elgar, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  22. Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White House Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Broome J (2006) Valuing policies in response to climate change: some ethical issues. A contribution to the work of the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  24. Broome J (2008) Why economics needs ethical theory. In: Basu K, Kanbur R (eds) Welfare, development, philosophy and social science: essays for Amartya Sen’s 75th birthday, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Cline WR (1991) The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(407):920–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cline WR (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Colander D, Holt R, Rosser Jr JB (2004) The changing face of mainstream economics. Rev Polit Econ 6(4):485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dasgupta P (2005) What do economists analyze and why: values or facts? Econ Philos 21:221–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dasgupta P (2007) Comments on the Stern Review’s Economics of Climate Change. Natl Inst Econ Rev 199:4–7Google Scholar
  30. Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy (in press)Google Scholar
  31. David P (2001) Path dependence, its critics, and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In Garrouste P, Ioannides S (eds) Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: past and present. Edward Elgar, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Deaton, A (2007) Letter from America—On transatlantic vices, or Stern in America. Royal Economic Society, Newletter, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  33. DeCanio S (2003) Economic models of climate change a critique. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. DeLong JB, Summers LH (2001) The new economy: background, historical perspective, questions, and speculations. Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp 11–43Google Scholar
  35. Dequech D (2007) Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. J Post Keynes Econ 30(2):279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dietz S, Hope C, Stern N, Zenghelis D (2007) Reflections on the Stern Review (1): a robust case for strong action to reduce the risks of climate change. World Econ 8(1):121–168Google Scholar
  37. Dietz S, Hope C, Patmore N (2007) Some economics of ‘dangerous’ climate change: reflections on the Stern Review. Glob Environ Change 17:311–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Felipe J, Fisher FM (2003) Aggregation in production functions: what applied economists should know. Metroeconomica 54:208–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Felipe J, McCombie JSL (2005) How sound are the foundations of the aggregate production function (in Symposium on the Aggregate Production Function). East Econ J 31(3):467–488Google Scholar
  40. Foley D (2006) Adam’s fallacy: a guide to economic theology. Harvard University Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  41. Frederick S, Loeenstein G, O’Donohue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit XL:351–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gowdy J (2005) Towards a new welfare economics for sustainability. Ecol Econ 53:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gritsevskyi A, Nakicenovic N (2000) Modelling uncertainty of induced technological change. Energy Policy 28(13):907–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hare RM (1981) Moral thinking. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Hasselmann KS, Hasselmann R, Giering, Ocaña V, Storch Hv (1997) Sensitivity study of optimal CO2 emission paths using a simplified Structural Integrated Assessment Model (SIAM). Clim Change 37:345–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hasselmann K (1999) Intertemporal accounting of climate change: harmonizing economic efficiency and climate stewardship. Clim Change 41:333–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heal G (1997) Discounting and climate change. Clim Change 37:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heinzerling L, Ackerman F (2007) Law and economics for a changing world. Harv Law Policy Rev 1(2):331–362Google Scholar
  49. Hodgson GM (2007) Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Evol Inst Econ Rev 4(1):7–25Google Scholar
  50. Hoel M, Sterner T (2007) Discounting and relative prices. Clim Change 84:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holt R (2007) What is Post Keynesian economics? In: Forstater M, Mongiovi G, Pressman S (eds) Post Keynesian macroeconomics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Hope C (2003): The marginal impacts of CO2, CH4 and SF6 emissions. Judge Institute of Management Research Paper 2003/10, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCCGoogle Scholar
  54. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1989) Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Katzner D (2003) Why mathematics in economics? J Post Keynes Econ 25(4):561–573Google Scholar
  56. Keynes JM (1973) The general theory and after, collected writings, vol. XIV. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirman AP (1992) Whom or what does the representative individual represent? J of Econ Perspect 6(2):117–136Google Scholar
  58. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  59. Köhler J, Grubb M, Popp D, Edenhofer O (2006) The transition to endogenous technical change in climate-economy models. The Energy Journal 27:17–55Google Scholar
  60. Maddison A (2001) The world economy: a millennial perspective. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  61. Maréchal K (2007) The economics of climate change and the change of climate in economics. Energy Policy 35:5181–5194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mastrandrea MD, Schneider SH (2001) Integrated assessment of abrupt climatic changes. Climate Policy 1:433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mastrandrea MD, Schneider SH (2004) Probabilistic integrated assessment of “dangerous” climate change. Science 304:571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mirowski P (1989) More heat than light economics as social physics: physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  65. Mirowski P (2002) Machine dreams economics becomes a cyborg science: light economics as social physics: physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  66. Munda G (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrogott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 78. Springer, Berlin, pp 953–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nelson JA (2006) Economics for humans. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson JA (2008) Economists, value judgments, and climate change: a view from feminist economics. Ecol Econ 65:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nelson RH (2001) Economics as religion from Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. State University Press, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  70. Nordhaus WD (1991a) A sketch of the economics of the greenhouse effect. Am Econ Rev 81(2):146–50Google Scholar
  71. Nordhaus WD (1991b) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(7):920–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nordhaus WD (1993) Optimal greenhouse-gas reductions and tax policy in the “DICE” Model. Am Econ Rev 83(2):313–317Google Scholar
  73. Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  74. Nordhaus WD (1997) Discounting in economics and climate change. Clim Change 37:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nordhaus WD (2007a) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of global warming. J Econ Lit 45(3):686–702Google Scholar
  76. Nordhaus WD (2007b) The challenge of global warming: economic models and environmental policy, July 24, 2007, YaleGoogle Scholar
  77. Nordhaus WD Boyer J (2000) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. MIT, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  78. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  79. Padilla E (2004) Climate change, economic analysis and sustainable development. Environ Values 13:523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pearce DW, Cline WR, Achanta AN, Fankhauser S, Pachauri RK, Tol RSJ, Vellinga P (1996) The social costs of climate change: greenhouse damages and the benefits of control. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate Change 1995—economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 125–44Google Scholar
  81. Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Am Econ Rev 92(1):160–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Price C (2005) An intergenerational perspective on effects of environmental changes: discounting the future's viewpoint. In Innes JL, Hickey GM, Hoen HF (eds) Forestry and environmental change: socioeconomic and political dimensions. Report 5 IUFRO Task Force on environmental changeGoogle Scholar
  83. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  84. Robbins L (1932) An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  85. Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD (2001) Economics, 17 edition. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  86. Stern N (2006/2007) The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (References are to the book, published in 2007)Google Scholar
  87. Tol RSJ (2005) The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33(16):2064–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tol RSJ (2007) The social cost of carbon: trends, cutliers and catastrophes. Economics Discussion Papers, 2007-44.
  89. Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2007) A review of the Stern Review. World Econ 7(4):233–250Google Scholar
  90. van den Bergh JCJM (2004) Optimal climate policy is a utopia: from quantitative to qualitative cost-benefit analysis. Ecol Econ 48:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weintraub ER (2002) How economics became a mathematical science. Duke University Press, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  92. Weitzman ML (2007) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Cited Dec 5, 2007
  93. Williams BAO (1985) Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  94. Yohe GW (1989) A study guide to accompany Samuelson & Nordhaus. Mc-Graw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Land EconomyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations