Climatic Change

, 88:267 | Cite as

Carbon dioxide sequestration: how much and when?

  • Klaus KellerEmail author
  • David McInerney
  • David F. Bradford


Carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration has been proposed as a key component in technological portfolios for managing anthropogenic climate change, since it may provide a faster and cheaper route to significant reductions in atmospheric CO2 concentrations than abating CO2 production. However, CO2 sequestration is not a perfect substitute for CO2 abatement because CO2 may leak back into the atmosphere (thus imposing future climate change impacts) and because CO2 sequestration requires energy (thus producing more CO2 and depleting fossil fuel resources earlier). Here we use analytical and numerical models to assess the economic efficiency of CO2 sequestration and analyze the optimal timing and extent of CO2 sequestration. The economic efficiency factor of CO2 sequestration can be expressed as the ratio of the marginal net benefits of sequestering CO2 and avoiding CO2 emissions. We derive an analytical solution for this efficiency factor for a simplified case in which we account for CO2 leakage, discounting, the additional fossil fuel requirement of CO2 sequestration, and the growth rate of carbon taxes. In this analytical model, the economic efficiency of CO2 sequestration decreases as the CO2 tax growth rate, leakage rates and energy requirements for CO2 sequestration increase. Increasing discount rates increases the economic efficiency factor. In this simple model, short-term sequestration methods, such as afforestation, can even have negative economic efficiencies. We use a more realistic integrated-assessment model to additionally account for potentially important effects such as learning-by-doing and socio-economic inertia on optimal strategies. We measure the economic efficiency of CO2 sequestration by the ratio of the marginal costs of CO2 sequestration and CO2 abatement along optimal trajectories. We show that the positive impacts of investments in CO2 sequestration through the reduction of future marginal CO2 sequestration costs and the alleviation of future inertia constraints can initially exceed the marginal sequestration costs. As a result, the economic efficiencies of CO2 sequestration can exceed 100% and an optimal strategy will subsidize CO2 sequestration that is initially more expensive than CO2 abatement. The potential economic value of a feasible and acceptable CO2 sequestration technology is equivalent – in the adopted utilitarian model – to a one-time investment of several percent of present gross world product. It is optimal in the chosen economic framework to sequester substantial CO2 quantities into reservoirs with small or zero leakage, given published estimates of marginal costs and climate change impacts. The optimal CO2 trajectories in the case of sequestration from air can approach the pre-industrial level, constituting geoengineering. Our analysis is silent on important questions (e.g., the effects of model and parametric uncertainty, the potential learning about these uncertainties, or ethical dimension of such geoengineering strategies), which need to be addressed before our findings can be translated into policy-relevant recommendations.


  1. Adam D (2001) Royal society disputes value of carbon sinks. Nature 412:108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger N, Aggarwal P, Agrawala S, Alcamo J, Allali A, Anisimov O, Arnell N, Boko M, Canziani O, Carter T, Casassa G, Confalonieri U, Cruz RV, Alcaraz EdA, Easterling W, Field C, Fischlin A, Fitzharris BB, García CG, Hanson C, Harasawa H, Hennessy K, Huq S, Jones R, Bogataj LK, Karoly D, Klein R, Kundzewicz Z, Lal M, Lasco R, Love G, Lu X, Magrín GJ, Mata L, McLean R, Menne B, Midgley G, Mimura N, Mirza MQ, Moreno J, Mortsch L, Niang-Diop I, Nicholls R, Nováky B, Nurse L, Nyong A, Oppenheimer M, Palutikof J, Parry M, Patwardhan A, Lankao PR, Rosenzweig C, Schneider S, Semenov S, Smith J, Stone J, Ypersele J-Pv, Vaughan D, Vogel C, Wilbanks T, Wong PP, Wu S, Yohe G (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, summary for policymakers, IPCC Secretariat, c/o WMO, 7bis, Avenue de la Paix, C.P. N° 2300, 1211 Geneva 2, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Alley R, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen Z, Chidthaisong A, Friedlingstein P, Gregory J, Hegerl G, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins B, Joos F, Jouzel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Manning M, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Qin D, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Solomon S, Somerville R, Stocker TF, Stott P, Stouffer RJ, Whetton P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis, summary for policymakers. IPCC Secretariat, c/o WMO, 7bis, Avenue de la Paix, C.P. N° 2300, 1211 Geneva 2, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247:920–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker T, Bashmakov I, Bernstein L, Bogner J, Bosch P, Dave R, Davidson O, Fisher B, Grubb M, Gupta S, Halsnaes K, Heij B, Ribeiro SK, Kobayashi S, Levine M, Martino D, Cerutti OM, Metz B, Meyer L, Nabuurs G-J, Najam A, Nakicenovic N, Rogner HH, Roy J, Sathaye J, Schock R, Shukla P, Sims R, Smith P, Swart R, Tirpak D, Urge-Vorsatz D, Dadi Z (2007) IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Summary for Policymakers’, IPCC Secretariat, c/o WMO, 7bis, Avenue de la Paix, C.P. N° 2300, 1211 Geneva 2, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  7. Benitez PC, McCallum I, Obersteiner M, Yamagata Y (2007) Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications. Ecol Econ 60:572–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiesa P, Consonni S (2000) Natural gas fired combined cycles with low CO2 emissions. J Eng Gas Turbines Power-Transactions of the Asme 122:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke L, Weyant J, Birky A (2006) On the sources of technological change: assessing the evidence. Energy Econ 28:579–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa PM, Wilson C (2000) An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration - description and applications in forestry. Mitig Adapt Strategies Global Change 5:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig PP, Gadgil A, Koomey JG (2002) What can history teach us? A retrospective examination of long-term energy forecasts for the United States. Annu Rev Energy Environ 27:83–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott S, Lackner KS, Ziock HJ, Dubey MK, Hanson HP, Barr S, Ciszkowski NA, Blake DR (2001) Compensation of atmospheric CO2 buildup through engineered chemical sinkage. Geophys Res Lett 28:1235–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fearnside PM, Lashof DA, Costa PM (2000) Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitig Adapt Strategies Global Change 5:239–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freund P, Adegbulugbe A, Christophersen Ø, Ishitani H, Moomaw W, Moreira J (2005) Introduction. In: Jochem CE (ed) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  15. Gerdemann SJ, O’Connor WK, Dahlin DC, Penner LR, Rush H (2007) Ex situ aqueous mineral carbonation. Environ Sci Technol 41:2587–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerlagh R (2006) ITC in a global growth-climate model with CCS: The value of induced technical change for climate stabilization. Energy J 223–240Google Scholar
  17. Grübler A, Nakicenovic N, Victor DG (1999) Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27:247–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herzog H, Caldeira K, Reilly J (2003) An issue of permanence: assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage. Clim Change 59:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herzog H, Smekens K, Dadhich P, Dooley J, Fujii Y, Hohmeyer O, Riahi K, Akai M, Hendriks C, Lackner K, Rana A, Rubin E, Schrattenholzer L, Senior B (2005) Cost and economic potential. In: Christensen J, Tosen G (eds) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 21–56Google Scholar
  20. House KZ, Schrag DP, Harvey CF, Lackner KS (2006) Permanent carbon dioxide storage in deep-sea sediments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12291–12295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joos F, Mueller-Fuerstenberger G, Stephan G (1999) Correcting the carbon cycle representation: How important is it for the economics of climate change? Environ Model Assess 4:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keith DW (2000) Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:245–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keith DW, Ha-Duong M, Stolaroff JK (2006) Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air. Climatic Change 74:17–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller K, Hall M, Kim S-R, Bradford DF, Oppenheimer M (2005) Avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Climatic Change 73:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keller K, Miltich LI, Robinson A, Tol RSJ (2007) How overconfident are current projections of carbon dioxide emissions? Working Paper Series, Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University. FNU-124,
  26. Kverndokk S, Rosendah KE (2007) Climate policies and learning by doing: Impacts and timing of technology subsidies. Resour Energy Econ 29:58–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lackner KS (2003) A guide to CO2 sequestration. Science 300:1677–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lackner KS, Ziock HJ, Grimes P (1999) The case for carbon dioxide extraction from the air. Source Book 57:6–10Google Scholar
  29. Lempert RJ, Schlesinger ME, Bankes SC, Andronova NG (2000) The impacts of climate variability on near-term policy choices and the value of information. Climatic Change 45:129–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manne AS, Barreto L (2004) Learn-by-doing and carbon dioxide abatement. Energy Economics 26:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manne AS, Richels RG (1991) Buying greenhouse insurance. Energy Policy 19:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manne A, Mendelsohn R, Richels R (1995) A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marchetti C (1977) Geo-Engineering and CO2 Problem. Climatic Change 1:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonald A, Schrattenholzer L (2001) Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McInerney D, Keller K (2007) Economically optimal risk reduction strategies in the face of uncertain climate thresholds. Climatic Change DOI  10.1007/s10584–006–9137-z, published online on 16 January 2007
  36. Messner S (1997) Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model. J Evol Econ 7:291–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nemet GF (2006) Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics. Energy Policy 34:3218–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nilsson S, Schopehauser W (1995) The carbon-sequestration potential of the global afforestation program. Climatic Change 30:267–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nordhaus WD (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258:1315–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nordhaus WD (2007) The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models and Environmental Policy,∼nordhaus/DICEGAMS/DICE2007.htm, accessed May 2, 2007, model version:
  41. Ramsey F (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 37:543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhodes JS, Keith DW (2005) Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 29:440–450Google Scholar
  43. Riahi K, Rubin ES, Schrattenholzer L (2004) Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy 29:1309–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richards KR (1997) The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogner HH (1997) An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu Rev Energy Environ 22:217–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rubin E, Meyer L, Coninck h.d., Abanades JC, Akai M, Benson S, Caldeira K, Cook P, Davidson O, Doctor R, Dooley J, Freund P, Gale J, Heidug W, Herzog H, Keith D, Mazzotti M, Metz B, Osman-Elasha B, Palmer A, Pipatti R, Smekens K, Soltanieh M, Thambimuthu K, Zwaan B.v.d. (2005) Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Technical Summary. In: Gizouli IE (ed) IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 442Google Scholar
  47. Schneider SH, Thompson SL (1981) Atmospheric CO2 and climate—importance of the transient-response. J Geophys Res-Oceans and Atmospheres 86:3135–3147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schulz PA, Kasting JF (1997) Optimal reduction in CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 25:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwoon M, Tol RSJ (2006) Optimal CO2-abatement with socio-economic inertia and induced technological change. Energy J 27:25–59Google Scholar
  50. Sohngen B, Sedjo R (2006) Carbon sequestration in global forests under different carbon price regimes. Energy J 109–126Google Scholar
  51. Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swinehart SC (1996) Afforestation as a method of carbon sequestration: A cost benefit analysisGoogle Scholar
  53. Thambimuthu K, Soltanieh M, Abanades JC, Allam R, Bolland O, Davison J, Feron P, Goede F, Herrera A, Iijima M, Jansen D, Leites I, Mathieu P, Rubin E, Simbeck D, Warmuzinski K, Wilkinson M, Williams R, Jaschik M, Lyngfelt A, Span R, Tanczyk M (2005) Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Capture of CO2. In: Abu-Ghararah Z, Yashima T (eds) IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 442Google Scholar
  54. Tol RSJ (1997) On the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions: An application of FUND. Environ Model Assess 2:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Kooten GC, Grainger A, Ley E, Marland G, Solberg B (1997) Conceptual issues related to carbon sequestration: Uncertainty and time. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27:65–82Google Scholar
  56. Ward FA (1979) The net social benefits from a research-induced cost-reduction of an energy backstop technology. Am J Agric Econ 61:668–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wing IS (2006) Representing induced technological change in models for climate policy analysis. Energy Econ 28:539–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yohe GW, Andronova NG, Schlesinger M (2004) To hedge or not to hedge against an uncertain future climate. Science 306:416–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Keller
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  • David McInerney
    • 2
  • David F. Bradford
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geophysical SciencesUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  5. 5.School of LawNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.University ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations