Climatic Change

, Volume 89, Issue 1–2, pp 143–154

Learning about ozone depletion

Open Access
Article

Abstract

Stratospheric ozone depletion has been much studied as a case history in the interaction between environmental science and environmental policy. The positive influence of science on policy is often underscored, but here we review the photochemistry of ozone in order to illustrate how scientific learning has the potential to mislead policy makers. The latter may occur particularly in circumstances where limited observations are combined with simplified models of a complex system, such as may generally occur in the global change arena. Even for the well-studied case of ozone depletion, further research is needed on the dynamics of scientific learning, particularly the scientific assessment process, and how assessments influence the development of public policy.

References

  1. Anderson SO, Madhava Sarma K (2002) Protecting the ozone layer: the United Nations history. Earthscan Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedick R (1998) Ozone diplomacy: new directions in safeguarding the planet. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman S (1930) A theory of upper atmospheric ozone. Memoirs of the Royal Meteorological Society 3:103–125Google Scholar
  5. Christie M (2001) Ozone layer: a philosophy of science perspective. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Crutzen PJ (1970) The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content. Q J R Meteorol Soc 96:320–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crutzen PJ (1971) Ozone production rates in an oxygen-hydrogen-nitrogen oxide atmosphere. J Geophys Res 76:7311–7327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crutzen PJ (1996) My life with O3, NOx, and YZOx compounds. Angew. Chem Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Suppl 35:1758–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutzen PJ, Arnold F (1986) Nitric acid cloud formation in the cold Antarctic stratosphere: a major cause for the springtime “ozone hole”. Nature 324:651–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crutzen PJ, Isaksen ISA, Reid GC (1975) Solar proton events: stratospheric sources of nitric oxide. Science 189:457–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dotto L, Schiff H (1978) The Ozone War, Doubleday & Co, Inc, Garden City, NY, Ch.2,3.Google Scholar
  12. Farman JC, Gardiner BG, Shanklin JD (1985) Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert GN, Mulkay M (1984) Experiments are the key. Isis 75:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ha-Duong M, Mégie G, Hauglustaine D (2003) A pro-active stratospheric ozone protection scenario. Global Environ Change 13:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammitt JK, Thompson JM (1997) Protecting the ozone layer. In: Graham JD, Hartwell JK (eds) The Greening of Industry: A Risk Management Approach. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 43–92Google Scholar
  16. Harrison H (1970) Stratospheric ozone with added water vapor: influence of high-altitude aircraft. Science 170:734–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heath DF, Krueger AJ, Crutzen PJ (1977) Solar proton events: influence on stratospheric ozone. Science 197:886–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofmann DJ, Solomon S (1989) Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichon. J Geophys Res 94(D4):5029–5041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston HS (1971) Reduction of stratospheric ozone by nitrogen oxide catalysts from supersonic transport exhaust. Science 173:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy MA, Cavender-Bares J, Clark W (2001) Goal and strategy formulation in the management of global environmental risks. In: The Social Learning Group, Learning to manage global environmental risks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Ch. 18Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell RB et al (ed) (2006) In: Global environmental assessments: information and influence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Molina MJ, Rowland FS (1974) Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature 249:810–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molina LT, Molina MJ (1987) Production of chlorine oxide (Cl2O2) from the self-reaction of the chlorine oxide (ClO) radical. J Phys Chem 91:433–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molina LT et al (1985) An upper limit to the rate of the HCl +CIONO2 reaction. J Phys Chem 89:3779–3781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Molina MJ et al (1987) Antarctic stratospheric chemistry of chlorine nitrate, hydrogen chloride, and ice: release of active chlorine. Science 238:1253–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moss RH, Schneider S (2000) Uncertainties. In: Pachauri R, et al (eds) Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Geneva, 2000, pp 33–51Google Scholar
  27. NAS (1984) Causes and effects of changes in stratospheric ozone: update 1983. Natl Acad Sci, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  28. Oppenheimer M, O’Neill BC, Webster M (2008) Negative learning. Climatic Change, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9405-1
  29. Oppenheimer M, O’Neill BC, Webster M, Agrawala S (2007) The limits of consensus. Science 317:1505–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parson E (2003) Protecting the ozone layer: science and strategy. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowland FS (1989) Chlorofluorocarbons and the depletion of stratospheric ozone. Am Sci 77:36–45Google Scholar
  32. Rowland FS (2006) Stratospheric ozone depletion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 361:769–790 DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sato H, Rowland FS (1984) Paper presented at the international meeting on current issues in our understanding of the stratosphere and the future of the ozone layer, Feldafing, West Germany, 11–16 June 1984Google Scholar
  34. Solomon S (1999) Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and history. Revs Geophys 37:275–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solomon S, Garcia RR, Rowland FS, Wuebbles DJ (1986) On the depletion of Antarctic ozone. Nature 321:755–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stolarski RS, Cicerone RJ (1974) Stratospheric chlorine: a possible sink for ozone. Can J Chem 52:1610–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toon OB et al (1986) Condensation of HNO3 and HCl in the winter polar stratosphere. Geophys Res Lett 13:1284–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weatherhead EC, Andersen SB (2006) The search for signs of recovery of the ozone layer. Nature 441:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. WMO (1986) Atmospheric Ozone 1985, Report No. 16, p 773Google Scholar
  40. WMO (1988) Report of the International Ozone Trends Panel-1988, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.18, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 1988Google Scholar
  41. WMO (1991) Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, 1991, World Meteorological Organization, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project – Report No. 25, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 1991Google Scholar
  42. WMO (2006) Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006, Executive Summay, World Meteorological Organization and UN Environment Program, Geneva, 2006Google Scholar
  43. Wuebbles DJ, Connell PS (1984) Interpreting the 1D Model Calculated Nonlinearities from Chlorocarbon Perturbations. Paper presented at international workshop on current issues in our understanding of the stratosphere and the future of the ozone layer, Feldafing, Germany, 11–16 June 1984Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric ChemistryMax Planck Institute for ChemistryMainzGermany
  2. 2.Department of GeosciencesPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations