Climatic Change

, Volume 87, Supplement 1, pp 309–322 | Cite as

Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change

Article

Abstract

In this paper we propose a framework for evaluating how prepared California resource managers are for risks of continued climate change. The framework presented suggests three critical dimensions of preparedness – awareness of climate-related risks, analytic capacity to translate such climate risks information into specific planning and management activities, and the extent of actions taken to address the risks. We illustrate the application of this framework in this paper through preliminary research of California coastal managers where we identify limited awareness of climate-change related risks, limited analytic capacity, and significant constraints on the abilities of institutions and individuals to take adaptation actions. Our analysis suggests that for California to realize its significant adaptive capacity and be able to manage the unavoidable impacts of climate change, resource managers need to be engaged more effectively in future discussions of managing climate risks in the state.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79:387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. Comptes Rendus Geosci 337:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alley RB, Clark PU et al (2005) Ice-sheet and sea-level changes. Science 310:456–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2002) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Bindschadler R (2006) Hitting the ice sheets where it hurts. Science 311:1720–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks N, Adger WN et al (2004) Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity. Technical paper 7. In: Lim B et al (ed) Adaptation policy framework: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–181Google Scholar
  7. Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly M (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. In: Adger WN, Arnell N, Tompkins EL (eds) Adaptation to climate change: perspectives across scales. Glob Environ Change 15:151–162Google Scholar
  8. Burton I (1994) Deconstructing adaptation... and reconstructing. Delta 5(1):14–15Google Scholar
  9. California Coastal Commission (2001) Overview of sea level rise and some implications for coastal California. California Coastal Commission, San Francisco, CA, p 32Google Scholar
  10. Callahan B, Miles EL, Fluharty D (1999) Policy implications of climate forecasts for water resources management in the Pacific Northwest. Policy Sci 32:269–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cash DW (2001) In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Sci Technol Human Values 26:431–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG (2006) Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Human Values 31:465–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cash DW, Clark WC et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cayan D, Bromirski P et al (2006) Projecting future sea level. Report prepared for the California Climate Energy Commission and the California Environmental Protection Agency. CEC-500-2005-202-SF, CEC, Sacramento, CA. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-500-2005-202/CEC-500-2005-202-SF.PDF. Cited on 24 October 2006
  15. Chambers R (1989) Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bull 20:1–7Google Scholar
  16. Changnon SA, Changnon JM, Changnon D (1995) Uses and applications of climate forecasts for power utilities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Church JA, Gregory JM et al (2001) Changes in sea level. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y et al (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the intergovernmental panel on climate change third assessment report. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 639–694Google Scholar
  18. Conway H, Hall BL et al (1999) Past and future grounding-line retreat of the West Antarctic ice sheet. Science 286:280–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cortner HJ (2000) Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environ Sci Policy 3:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahl-Jensen D (2000) The Greenland ice sheet reacts. Science 289:404–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dowdeswell JA (2006) The Greenland ice sheet and global sea-level rise. Science 311:963–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterling W, Hurd B, Smith J (2004) Coping with global climate change: the role of adaptation in the United States. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Few R (2003) Flooding, vulnerability and coping mechanisms: local responses to a global threat. Progress in Development Studies 3:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flick RE (1998) Comparison of California tides, storm surges and mean sea level during the El Niño winters of 1982–83 and 1997–98. Shore Beach 66(3):7–11Google Scholar
  25. Flick RE, Cayan DC (1984) Extreme sea levels on the coast of California. Nineteenth Coastal Engineering Conference, Houston, Texas. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  26. Folke C, Carpenter S et al (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Scientific background paper on resilience prepared for the process of The World Summit on Sustainable Development on behalf of The Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government, pp 33Google Scholar
  27. FrameWorks Institute (2001) Talking global warming (summary of research findings). FrameWorks Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Galbraith H, Jones R, Park R, Clough J, Herrod-Julius S, Harrington B, Page G (2005) Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191, pp 1119–1122Google Scholar
  29. Glantz MH (ed) (2001) Once burned twice shy? lessons from the 1997–98 El Niño. United Nations University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  30. Griggs GB (2005) California’s retreating coastline: where do we go from here? AMS Forum: Living in the Coastal Zone, http://www.ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2005/techprogram/paper_83241.htm. Cited 14 June 2006
  31. Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Haddad BM (2005) Ranking the adaptive capacity of nations to climate change when socio-political goals are explicit. Glob Environ Change 15:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Healy RG, Ascher W (1995) Knowledge in the policy process: incorporating new environmental information in natural resources policy making. Policy Sci 28:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacobs K (2002) Connecting science, policy, and decision-making: a handbook for researchers and science agencies. NOAA Office of Global Programs, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones R (2003) Managing climate change risks. OECD workshop on the benefits of climate policy: improving information for policy makers. OECD, Paris, p 37Google Scholar
  36. Jones R, Boer R (2005) Assessing current climate risks. Technical paper 4. In: Lim B et al (ed) Adaptation policy framework: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–117Google Scholar
  37. Jones SA, Fischhoff B, Lach D (1999) Evaluating the science-policy interface for climate change research. Clim Change 43:581–599Google Scholar
  38. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Turner BL II (1995) Regions at risk: comparisons of threatened environments. United Nations University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  39. Kates RW (1997) Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations, and mitigation. Environment 39(9):29–33Google Scholar
  40. Krabill W, Hanna E et al (2004) Greenland ice sheet: increased coastal thinning. Geophys Res Lett 31(24):L24402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mageean DM, Lameka R, Van Arsdol MS Jr, Constable A, Davis WJ (2001) Climate change and sea level rise: impacts and policy responses in California and Maine. Proceedings of International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. Sao Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  42. McIntosh A (2005) Agencies facing loss of leaders. Sacramento Bee 17 October, pD1.Google Scholar
  43. McLean RF, Tsyban A et al. (2001) Coastal zones and marine ecosystems. In Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the intergovernmental panel on climate change third assessment report. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF et al (eds) Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 343–379Google Scholar
  44. Meehl GA, Washington WM et al (2005) How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307:1769–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitchell RB, Clark WC et al (eds) (2006) Global environmental assessments: information, institutions, and influence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore LJ, Griggs GB (2002) Long-term cliff retreat and erosion hotspots along the central shores of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Mar Geol 181:265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moser SC (2006) Climate change and sea-level rise in Maine and Hawai’i: the changing tides of an issue domain. In Global environmental assessments: information, institutions, and influence. In: Mitchell RB, Clark WC et al (eds) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 201–239Google Scholar
  48. Moser SC, Tribbia J (2006, 2007) Vulnerability to inundation and climate change impacts in California: Coastal managers’ attitudes and perceptions. Mar Technol Soc J 40(4):35–44Google Scholar
  49. Mount J, Twiss R (2005) Subsidence, sea level rise, and seismicity in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 3(1):1–18Google Scholar
  50. Neumann JE, Hudgens DE, Herr JL, Kassakian J (2002) Economic impact of sea level rise on coastal structures in California. Proceedings of California and the World Ocean ‘02: revisiting and revising California’s Ocean Agenda, 27–30 October 2002. In: Santa Barbara CA, Magoon O et al (eds) ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 845–859Google Scholar
  51. Nicholls N (1999) Cognitive illusions, heuristics, and climate prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 7:1385–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Brien K, Eriksen S et al (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paterson WSB, Reeh N (2001) Thinning of the ice sheet in northwest Greenland over the past forty years. Nature 414:60–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Change 15:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pulwarty RS (2003) Climate and water in the West: science, information and decision-making. Water Resour Update 124:4–12Google Scholar
  56. Pulwarty RS, Redmond KT (1997) Climate and salmon restoration in the Columbia River Basin: the role and usability of seasonal forecasts. Bull Meteorol Soc 78(3):381–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pulwarty RS, Melis TS (2001) Climate extremes and adaptive management on the Colorado River: lessons from the 1997–1998 ENSO event. Environ Manag 63:307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ray AJ (2003) Reservoir management in the Interior West: the influence of climate variability and functional linkages of water. In: Diaz H, Morehouse B (eds) Climate, water, and transboundary challenges in the Americas. Kluwer, Boston, pp 193–21Google Scholar
  59. Rayner S, Lach D, Ingram H (2005) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Change 69:197–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rignot E, Thomas RH (2002) Mass balance of polar ice sheets. Science 297:1502–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rignot E, Kanagaratnam P (2006) Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 311:986–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan H, Gibbons H et al (1999) El Niño sea-level rise wreaks havoc in California’s San Francisco Bay region. USGS Fact Sheet. USGS, Menlo Park, CA, USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Program.Google Scholar
  63. Sallenger AH, Krabill W et al (2002) Sea-cliff erosion as a function of beach changes and extreme wave runup during the 1997–1998 El Niño. Mar Geol 187(3–4):279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shepherd A, Wingham D, Rignot E (2004) Warm ocean is eroding West Antarctic ice sheet. Geophys Res Lett 31(23):L23402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (eds) Climate change adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press, London, pp 9–28Google Scholar
  66. Steel B, List P et al (2004) The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: a case study from the American west. Environ Sci Policy 7:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Storlazzi CD, Griggs GB (2000) Influence of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events on the evolution of central California’s shoreline. Bull Am Geol Soc 112(2):236–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thieler ER, Hammar-Klose ES (2000) National assessment of coastal vulnerability to future sea-level rise: preliminary results for the US Pacific coast. US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 00-178. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of00-178/. Cited on 24 October 2006
  69. Tompkins EL (2005) Planning for climate change in small islands: insights from national hurricane preparedness in the Cayman Islands. Glob Environ Change 15:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004) Building resilience to climate change through adaptive management of resources. Ecol Soc 9(2):10. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art10/. Cited on 24 October 2006Google Scholar
  71. Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2005) Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tribbia J, Moser SC (2008) More than information: What coastal managers need to prepare for climate change. Environ Sci Policy (under review)Google Scholar
  73. United Kingdom Climate Impacts Group (UKCIP) (2003) Climate change and local communities: how prepared are you? UKCIP, Oxford, UK. http://www.ukcip.org.uk/resources/publications/documents/Local_authority.pdf. Cited 22 November 2005
  74. Wigley TML (2005) The climate change commitment. Science 307:1766–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilbanks TJ, Kane SM et al (2003) Integrating mitigation and adaptation: possible responses to global climate change. Environment 45:30–38Google Scholar
  76. Yohe G, Tol R (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity – moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 12:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Study of Society and EnvironmentNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Amy Lynd Luers, Google.OrgSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations