Climatic Change

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 157–185 | Cite as

Evaluating regional climate model estimates against site-specific observed data in the UK

  • M. RivingtonEmail author
  • D. Miller
  • K. B. Matthews
  • G. Russell
  • G. Bellocchi
  • K. Buchan


This paper compares precipitation, maximum and minimum air temperature and solar radiation estimates from the Hadley Centre’s HadRM3 regional climate model (RCM), (50 × 50 km grid cells), with observed data from 15 meteorological station in the UK, for the period 1960–90. The aim was to investigate how well the HadRM3 is able to represent weather characteristics for a historical period (hindcast) for which validation data exist. The rationale was to determine if the HadRM3 data contain systematic errors and to investigate how suitable the data are for use in climate change impact studies at particular locations. Comparing modelled and observed data helps assess and quantify the uncertainty introduced to climate impact studies. The results show that the model performs very well for some locations and weather variable combinations, but poorly for others. Maximum temperature estimations are generally good, but minimum temperature is overestimated and extreme cold events are not represented well. For precipitation, the model produces too many small events leading to a serious under estimation of the number of dry days (zero precipitation), whilst also over- or underestimating the mean annual total. Estimates represent well the temporal distribution of precipitation events. The model systematically over-estimates solar radiation, but does produce good quality estimates at some locations. It is concluded that the HadRM3 data are unsuitable for detailed (i.e. daily time step simulation model based) site-specific impacts studies in their current form. However, the close similarity between modelled and observed data for the historical case raises the potential for using simple adjustment methods and applying these to future projection data.


Regional Climate Model Climate Change Impact Study Hindcast Simulation Regional Climate Model Output Nest Regional Climate Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antic S, Laprise R, Denis B, de Elia R (2006) Testing the downscaling ability of a one-way nested regional climate model in regions of complex topography. Clim Dyn 26:305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold SM, Monteith JL (1974) Plant development and mean temperature in a Teesdale habitat. J Ecol 62:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BADC (2005) British Atmospheric Data Centre:
  4. Bell JL, Sloan LC, Snyder MA (2004) Regional changes in extreme climatic events: a future climate scenario. J Clim 17:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Creed IF, Band LE, Foster NW, Morrison IK, Nicolson JA, Semkin RS, Jeffries DS (1996) Regulation of nitrate-N release from temperate forests: a test of the N flushing hypothesis. Water Resour Res 32:3337–3354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donatelli M, Bellocchi G (2001) Estimates of daily global solar radiation: new developments in the software RadEst3.00. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Modelling Cropping Systems, Florence, Italy. 16–18 July 2001. Inst. for Biometeorology, CNR, Florence, Italy, pp 213–214Google Scholar
  7. Droogers P, Aerts J (2005) Adaptation strategies to climate change and climate variability: a comparative study between seven contrasting river basins. Phys Chem Earth 30:339–346Google Scholar
  8. Evans JP, Oglesby RJ, Lapenta WM (2005) Time series analysis of regional climate model performance. J Geophys Res Atmos 110(D4):D04104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler HJ, Ekstrom M, Kilsby CG, Jones PD (2005) New estimates of future changes in extreme rainfall across the UK using regional climate model integrations. 1. Assessment of control climate. J Hydrol 300:212–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frei C, Christensen JH, Déqué M, Jacob D, Jones RG, Vidale PL (2002) Daily precipitation statistics in regional climate models: evaluation and intercomparison for the European Alps. J Geophys Res 108:4124–4142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holman IP, Rounsevell MDA, Shackley S, Harrison PA, Nicholls RJ, Berry PM, Audsley E (2005) A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK. Clim Change 71:9–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoogenboom G (2000) Contribution of agro-meteorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications. Agric For Meteorol 103:137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulme M, Jenkins GJ, Lu X, Turnpenny JR, Mitchell TD, Jones RG, Lowe J, Murphy JM, Hassell D, Boorman P, McDonald R, Hill S (2002) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Huntingford C, Jones RG, Prudhomme C, Lamb R, Gash JHC, Jones DA (2003) Regional climate-model predictions of extreme rainfall for a changing climate. Q J R Meteorol Soc 129:1607–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2000) Inter-governmental panel on climate change, special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Jarvis CH, Baker RHA, Morgan D (2003) The impact of interpolated daily temperature data on landscape-wide predictions of invertebrate pest phenology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkins G, Lowe J (2003) Handling uncertainties in the UKCIP02 scenarios of climate change. Hadley Centre technical note 44, 20th November 2003. Meteorological Office, Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones CG, Willen U, Ullerstig A, Hansson U (2004) The Rossby Centre regional atmospheric climate model part 1: model climatology and performance for the present climate over Europe. Ambio 33:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim J, Lee J-U (2003) A multiyear regional climate hindcast for the Western United States using the mesoscale atmospheric simulation model. J Hydrometeorol 4:878–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LADSS (2007) Land Allocation Decision Support System website.
  21. Mearns LO, Giorgi F, McDaniel L, Shields C (1995) Analysis of daily precipitation in a nested regional climate model: comparisons with observations and doubled CO2 results. Glob Planet Change 10:55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moberg A, Jones PD (2004) Regional climate model simulations of daily maximum and minimum near-surface temperatures across Europe compared with observed station data 1961–1990. Clim Dyn 23:695–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DM, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nijkamp P, Wang SL, Kremers H (2005) Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context: the use of the GTAP-E model. Econ Model 22:955–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nonhebel S (1994a) The effects of use of average instead of daily weather data in crop growth simulation models. Agric Syst 44:377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nonhebel S (1994b) Inaccuracies in weather data and their effects on crop growth simulation results. I. Potential production. Clim Res 4:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng PT, Kumar A, van den Dool H, Barnston AG (2002) An analysis of multimodel ensemble predictions for seasonal climate anomalies. J Geophys Res Atmos 107(D23):4710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rivington M, Bellocchi G, Matthews KB, Buchan K (2005) Evaluation of three model estimates of solar radiation at 24 UK stations. Agric For Meteorol 132:228–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rivington M, Matthews KB, Bellocchi G, Buchan K (2006) Evaluating uncertainty introduced to process-based simulation model estimates by alternative sources of meteorological data. Agric Syst 88:451–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rivington M, Matthews KB, Bellocchi G, Buchan K, Stöckle CO, Donatelli M (2007) An Integrated Assessment approach to conduct analyses of climate change impacts on whole-farm systems. Environ Mod Software 22:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Semenov MA (2002) LARS-WG: A Stochastic Weather Generator for Use in Climate Impact Studies.
  32. Soulsby C (1995) Contrasts in storm event hydrochemistry in an acidic afforested catchment in upland Wales. J Hydrol 170:159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sperow M, Eve M, Paustian K (2003) Potential soil C sequestration on US agricultural soils. Clim Change 57:319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stöckle CO, Campbell GS, Nelson R (1999) ClimGen manual. Biological Systems Engineering Department, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. USA.
  35. Vidale PL, Luthi D, Frei C, Seneviratne SI, Schar C (2003) Predictability and uncertainty in a regional climate model. J Geophys Res 108:ACL12.1–ACL12.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weibull W (1961) Fatigue testing and analysis of results. Pergamon, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang XC (2005) Spatial downscaling of global climate model output for site-specific assessment of crop production and soil erosion. Agric For Meteorol 135:215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Rivington
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Miller
    • 1
  • K. B. Matthews
    • 1
  • G. Russell
    • 2
  • G. Bellocchi
    • 3
  • K. Buchan
    • 1
  1. 1.Macaulay InstituteCraigiebucklerUK
  2. 2.School of Geosciences, The Crew BuildingUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Agrichiana FarmingMontepulcianoItaly

Personalised recommendations