Climatic Change

, 87:199

Vulnerability of European reindeer husbandry to global change

  • W. G. Rees
  • F. M. Stammler
  • F. S. Danks
  • P. Vitebsky


Reindeer husbandry represents a major land use in the Barents region, and has been predicted to be adversely affected by climate change. This paper considers the likely response of reindeer husbandry to changes both in climate and in socio-economic circumstances in the four countries of the Barents region from 1990 to 2080. Key natural factors include vegetation distribution, and a range of meteorological variables including temperature, wind, snow cover and freezing of rivers. The potential impact of these factors is evaluated quantitatively using the tolerable windows method, the results of which indicate a general but spatially non-uniform decline in the suitability of the region for reindeer husbandry. Relevant socio-economic factors include regional patterns of politics, management and knowledge. A focus on herders’ own perceptions of environmental change and flexibility of response, derived particularly from study sites in Russia, suggests that models of vulnerability to climate change should be tempered by paying greater attention to changes in socio-economic factors. When compared with the potential effect of changing these socioeconomic factors, the vulnerability of reindeer husbandry to projected climate change appears to be comparatively small.


  1. ACIA (2004) Impacts of a warming arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson D (2000) Identity and ecology in Arctic Siberia: the number one reindeer brigade. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Beach H (1981) Reindeer-herd management in transition: the case of Tuorpon Saameby in Northern Sweden. Almqvist & Wiksell, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  4. Beach H, Anderson M, Aikio P (1992) Dynamics of Saami territoriality within the Nation States of Norway, Sweden and Finland. In: Casimir M, Rao A (eds) Mobility and territoriality: social and spatial boundaries among foragers, fishers, pastoralists and peripatetics. Berg, Oxford, pp. 55–90Google Scholar
  5. Behnke RH (2000) Equilibrium and non-equilibrium models of livestock population dynamics in pastoral Africa: their relevance to Arctic grazing systems. Rangifer 20:141–152Google Scholar
  6. Bernard L, Ostländer N (2008) Assessment of climate change vulnerability in the Arctic using geographic information services in spatial data infrastructures. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9346-0
  7. Brown RD (2000) Northern hemisphere snow cover variability and change. J Climate 13:2339–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CAVM Team (2003) Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Scale 1:7500000. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map no 1, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin FS, Shaver GR (1996) Physiological and growth responses of Arctic plants to a field experiment simulating climate change. Ecology 77(3):822–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, Alatalo JM, Michelsen A, Graglia E, Hartley AE, Hik DS, Hobbie SE, Press MC, Robinson CH, Henry GHR, Shaver GR, Phoenix GK, Gwynn Jones D, Jonasson S, Chapin FS, Molau U, Neill C, Lee JA, Melillo JM, Sveinbjörnsson B, Aerts R (2001) Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? J Ecol 89:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dankers R (2002) Sub-arctic hydrology and climate change: a case study of the Tana river basin in northern Fennoscandia. KNAG/Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Utrecht, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  12. Dankers R, Middelkoop H (2008) River discharge and freshwater runoff to the Barents Sea under present and future climate conditions. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9349-x
  13. European Commission, J. R. C. (2003) Global Land Cover 2000 database 2003 [cited 6/2/2006. Available from
  14. Everett JT, Fitzharris BB (1998) The Arctic and the Antarctic. In: Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, Dokken DJ (eds) Regional impacts of climate change – an assessment of vulnerability. A special report of IPCC working group II for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–103Google Scholar
  15. Göttel H, Alexander J, Keup-Thiel E, Rechid D, Hagemann S, Blome T, Wolf A, Jacob D (2008) Influence of changed vegetations fields on regional climate simulations in the Barents Sea Region. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9341-5
  16. Gunn A (1995) Responses of Arctic Ungulates to climate change. In: Peterson DL, Johnson DR (eds) Human ecology and climate change: people and resources in the far North. Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., pp 89–104Google Scholar
  17. Gunn A, Skogland T (1997) Responses of caribou and reindeer to global warming. Ecol Stud 124:189–200Google Scholar
  18. Habeck JO (2002) How to turn a reindeer pasture into an oil well, and vice versa: transfer of land, compensation and reclamation in the Komi Republic. In: Kasten E (ed) People and the land. Pathways to reform in post-Soviet Siberia. Reimer, Berlin, pp 125–147Google Scholar
  19. Habeck JO (2005) What it means to be a herdsman: the practice and image of reindeer husbandry among the Komi of Northern Russia. Litverlag, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  20. Helle T (1995) Reindeer husbandry and hunting. In: Hytönen M (ed) Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Rovaniemi, pp 157–190Google Scholar
  21. Helle T, Tarvainen L (1984) Effects of insect harassment on weight gain and survival in reindeer calves. Rangifer 4:28–34Google Scholar
  22. IPCC (1998) The regional impacts of climate change: an assessment of vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Jernsletten J-L, Beach H (2006) The challenges and dilemmas of concession reindeer management in Sweden. In: Forbes BC, Bölter M, Müller-Wille L, Hukkinen J, Müller F, Gunslay N, Konstantinov Y (eds) Reindeer management in northernmost Europe: linking practical and scientific knowledge in social-ecological systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–116Google Scholar
  24. Keskitalo ECH (2008) Vulnerability and adaptive capacity in forestry in Northern Europe: The case of Sweden. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9337-1
  25. Kolpashikov IA (2000) Ecological characteristics and prospects for sustainable use of the Taimyr Peninsula wild reindeer population. In: Ebbinge BS, Mazurov YL, Tomkovich PS (eds) Heritage of the Russian Arctic: research, conservation and international cooperation. Ecopros, Moscow, pp 520–530Google Scholar
  26. Konstantinov Y (2005) Reindeer-herders. Field-notes from the Kola Peninsula (1994–1995). Uppsala University Department of Cultural Anthropology and Ethnology, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  27. Krupnik I (1993) Arctic Adaptations: native whalers and reindeer herders of Northern Eurasia. University Press of New England, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
  28. Krupnik I, Jolly D (eds) (2002) Book the earth is faster now: indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change. Arctic Research Consortium of the United States, Fairbanks, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  29. Lange MA (2008) Assessing climate change impacts in the European North. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9336-2
  30. Mathiesen SD, Haga ØE, Kaino T, Tyler NJC (2000) Diet composition, rumen papillation and maintenance of carcass mass in female Norwegian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in winter. J Zool 251:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller FL, Gunn A (1986) Observations of barren-ground caribou travelling on thin ice during fall migration. Arctic 39:85–88Google Scholar
  32. Nellemann C, Kullerud L, Vistnes I, Forbes BC, Husby E, Kofinas GP, Kaltenborn BP, Rouaud J, Magomedova M, Bobiwash R, Lambrechts C, Schei PJ, Tveitdal S, Grøn O, Larsen TS (2001) GLOBIO: Global methodology for mapping human impacts on the biosphere. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  33. Oechel WC, Cook AC, Hastings SJ, Vourlitis GL (1997) Effects of CO2 and climate change on arctic ecosystems. In: Woodin SJ, Marquiss M (eds) Ecology of arctic environments. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 255–273Google Scholar
  34. Pelto PJ (1973) The snowmobile revolution: technology and social change in the Arctic. Benjamin and Cummings, Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Petschel-Held G, Schnellnhuber H-J, Bruckner T, Tóth FL, Hasselmann K (1999) The tolerable windows approach: theoretical and methodological foundations. Clim Change 41(3–4):303–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pyykkö J, Jääskö O (2006) The role of old-growth forests in Saami reindeer herding. Taiga Rescue Network 2004 [cited 10/02/2006 2006]. Available from
  37. Rees WG, Rigina O (2003) Methodologies for remote sensing of the environmental impacts of industrial activity in the Arctic and sub-Arctic. In: Rasmussen RO, Koroleva NE (eds) Social and environmental impacts in the north. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 67–88Google Scholar
  38. Rees WG, Williams M, Vitebsky P (2003) Mapping land cover changes in a reindeer herding area of the Russian Arctic using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery and indigenous knowledge. Remote Sens Environ 85:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell DR, Martell AM, Nixon W (1993) Range ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd in Canada. Rangifer Spec Issue 8:1–168Google Scholar
  40. Stammler F (2002) Success at the edge of the land: present and past challenges for reindeer herders of the West-Siberian Yamal–Nenets autonomous Okrug. Nomad Peoples 6:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stammler F (2005) Reindeer nomads meet the market: culture, property and globalisation at the end of the land. Litverlag, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  42. Stammler F, Ventsel A (2003) Between neoliberalism and dirigisme: approaches to reindeer herding in Yamal and Sakha. In: Hann CM (ed) The postsocialist agrarian question: property relations and the rural condition. Litverlag, Münster, pp 321–362Google Scholar
  43. Storeheier PV, van Oort BEH, Sundset MA, Mathiesen SD (2003) Food intake of reindeer in winter. J Agric Sci 140:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sturm M, Racine C, Tape K (2001) Climate change: increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411:546–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tuisku T (2003) Surviving in the oil age. In: Rasmussen RO, Koroleva NE (eds) Social and Environmental Impacts in the North. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 449–461Google Scholar
  46. van Herk CM, Aptroot A, Dobben HF (2002) Long-term monitoring in the Netherlands suggests that lichens respond to global warming. Lichenologist 3(2):141–154Google Scholar
  47. Vitebsky P (1990) Gas, environmentalism and Native anxieties in the Soviet Arctic: the case of Yamal Peninsula. Polar Rec 26(156):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitebsky P (1992) Landscape and self-determination among the Eveny: the political environment of Siberian reindeer-herders today. In: Croll E, Parkin D (eds) Bush base, forest farm: culture, environment and development. Routledge, London, pp 223–246Google Scholar
  49. Vitebsky P (2005) Reindeer people: living with animals and spirits in Siberia. Harper-Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (eds) (1996) Book climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. White RG, Bunnell FL, Gaare E, Skogland T, Hubert B (1981) Ungulates on arctic ranges. In: Bliss LC, Heal W, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 397–483Google Scholar
  52. Wolf A, Callaghan TV, Larson K (2008) Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4
  53. Yuzhakov A, Mukhachev A (2001) Etnicheskoe Olenevodstvo Zapadnoi Sibir: Nenetskii Tip [Native reindeer husbandry of western Siebria: the Nenets type]. Agricultural Science Publishers, NovosibirskGoogle Scholar
  54. Zöckler C, Miles L, Fish L, Wolf A, Rees G, Danks F (2008) Potential impact of climate change and reindeer density on tundra indicator species in the Barents Sea Region. Clim Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9344-2

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. G. Rees
    • 1
  • F. M. Stammler
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. S. Danks
    • 1
  • P. Vitebsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Scott Polar Research InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Arctic CentreUniversity of LaplandRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations