Environmentalists are often upset at the effect of discounting costs of future environmental damage, e.g., due to climate change. An often-overlooked message is that we should discount costs but also take into account the increase in the relative price of the ecosystem service endangered. The effect of discounting would thus be counteracted, and if the rate of price rise of the item was fast enough, it might even be reversed. The scarcity that leads to rising relative prices for the environmental good will also have direct effects on the discount rate itself. The magnitude of these effects depends on properties of the economy’s technology and on social preferences. We develop a simple model of the economy that illustrates how changes in crucial technology and preference parameters may affect both the discount rate and the rate of change of values of environmental goods. The combined effect of discounting and the change of values of environmental goods is more likely to be low – or even negative – the lower the growth rate of environmental quality (or the larger its decline rate), and the lower the elasticity of substitution between environmental quality and produced goods.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow KJ, Cline WR, Mäler K-G, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz JE (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency. In: Bruce JP, Lee H, Haites EF (eds) Climate Change 1995: economic and social dimensions – contribution of working group III to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 125–144Google Scholar
- Bank of England (2005) http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics/index.htm. Accessed 20051215
- Cline W (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC. ISBN 088132132XGoogle Scholar
- Dasgupta P (2001) Human well-being and the natural environment, part III. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Dasgupta P, Heal G (1979) Economic theory and exhaustible resources. In: Cambridge economic handbooksGoogle Scholar
- Halifax and Bank of Scotland (HBOS) 2005. Halifax house price index, http://www.hbosplc.com/economy/includes/historic_data_01.11.2005.xls. Accessed November 2005
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Working group II assessment. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg2/411.htm). Accessed 20051215
- Krutilla JV (1967) Conservation reconsidered. Am Econ Rev 57(4):777–786Google Scholar
- Lind R (ed) (1982) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. RFF Press, Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Philibert C (2006) Discounting the future. In: Pannell DJ, Schilizzi SGM (eds) Economics and the future. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Portney PR, Weyant JP (eds) (1999) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Vennemo H (1997) On the discounted price of future environmental services. ECON, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar