Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 83, Issue 1–2, pp 151–168 | Cite as

Frequency and duration of historical droughts from the 16th to the 19th centuries in the Mexican Maya lands, Yucatan Peninsula

  • Blanca MendozaEmail author
  • Virginia García-Acosta
  • Victor Velasco
  • Ernesto Jáuregui
  • Rosa Díaz-Sandoval
Article

Abstract

Using unprecedented catalogues of past severe drought data for the Yucatan Peninsula between 1502 and 1900 coming from historical written documentation, we identified five conspicuous time lapses with no droughts between 1577–1647, 1662–1724, 1728–1764, 1774–1799 and 1855–1880, as well as time epochs with most frequent droughts between 1800 and 1850. Moreover, the most prominent periodicity of the historical drought time series was that of ∼40 years. Using the Palmer Drought Severity Index for the Yucatan Peninsula for the period 1921–1987 we found prominent negative phases between ∼1942–1946 and 1949–1952, 1923–1924, 1928–1929, 1935–1936, 1962–1963, 1971–1972 and 1986–1987. Two prominent periodicities clearly appear at ∼5 and 10 years. Most modern and historical severe droughts lasted 1 year, and share a quasi-decadal frequency. Also, in the first 66 years of the twentieth century the frequency of occurrence of severe drought has been lower compared with the nineteenth century. Some of the major effects and impacts of the most severe droughts in the Yucatan region are examined. We also studied the relation between historical and modern droughts and several large scale climate phenomena represented by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI). Our results indicate that historical droughts and the cold phase of the AMO coincide, while the influence of the SOI is less clear. The strongest coherence between historical droughts and AMO occurred at periodicities of ∼40 years. For modern droughts the coherence of a drought indicator (the Palmer Drought Severity Index) is similar with AMO and SOI, although it seems more sustained with the AMO. They are strongest at ∼10 years and very clearly with the AMO cold phase. Concerning the solar activity proxies and historical droughts, the coherence with a record of beryllium isotope Be10, which is a good proxy of cosmic rays, is higher than with Total Solar Irradiance. We notice that the strongest coherence between historical droughts and Be10 occurs at periods ∼60–64 years. When studying modern droughts and solar activity, frequencies of ∼8 years appear, and the coherences are similar for both sunspots and cosmic rays. Comparing natural terrestrial and solar phenomena, we found that the most sustained and strongest modulation of historical drought occurrence is at ∼60–64 years and is between the historical drought series and the solar proxy Be10. For modern droughts we notice that the coherence is similar among AMO, SOI and the solar indices. We can conclude that the sea surface temperatures (AMO) and solar activity leave their signal in terms of severe droughts in the Maya lands, however in the long term, the influence of the SOI on this type of phenomenon is less clear.

Keywords

Southern Oscillation Index Palmer Drought Severity Index Total Solar Irradiance Yucatan Peninsula Wavelet Power Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beer J (2000) Long-term indirect indices of solar variability. Space Sci Rev 94:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bracamonte P (1994) La memoria enclaustrada. Historia indígena de Yucatán, 1750–1915, Historia de los pueblos indígenas de México, CIESAS and INI, México, 253 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavazos T, Hastenrath S (1990) Convection and rainfall over Mexico and their modulation by the Southern Oscillation. Int J Climatol 10:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colle B, Moss C (1995) The structure and evolution of cold surges east of the Rocky Mountains. Mon Weather Rev 123:2577–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daubechies I (1990) The wavelet transforms time–frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 36:901–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Mego J, Basart L, Endersen W (1976) An examination of the frequency and mean conditions surrounding frontal incursions into the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Mon Weather Rev 104:709–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Escobar A (2004) Desastres agrícolas en México. Catálogo histórico. Tomo II: Siglo XIX (1822–1900). Fondo de Cultura Económica and CIESAS, México, 280 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Farriss NM (1992) La sociedad maya bajo el dominio colonial. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 653 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Florescano E (1980) Análisis históricos de las sequías en México. SARH Committee Plan Hidráulico Nacional, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  10. Folland CK, Palmer TN, Parker DE (1986) Sahel rainfall and worldwide sea temperatures. Nature 320:602–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Acosta V, Pérez-Zevallos JM, Molina del Villar A (2003) Desastres agrícolas en México. Catálogo histórico. Tomo I: Épocas prehispánica y colonial (958–1822). Fondo de Cultura Económica and CIESAS, México, 506 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilman DL, Fuglister FH, Mitchell JM (1963) On the power spectrum of “red noise.” J Atmos Sci 20:182–-184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldenberg SB, Landsea CW, Mestas-Nuñez AM, Gray WM (2001) The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: causes and implications. Science 293:474–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray ST, Graumlich LJ, Betancourt JL, Pederson GT (2004) A tree-ring based reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation since 1567 A.D. Geophys Res Lett 31:L12205–L12208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grinsted A, Moore J, Jevrejera S (2004) Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Process Geophys 11:561–566Google Scholar
  16. Hasegawa H (2005) A wavelet analysis of transient spike trains of Hodgkin–Huxley neurons. http://arxiv.org/ps/cond-mat/0109444
  17. Herrera G (2005) Caracterización Geográfica de la Sequía en México. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Colegio de GeografíaGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodell DA, Brenner M, Curtis JH (2004) Terminal classic drought in the northern Maya lowlands inferred from multiple sediment cores in lake Chichancanab (Mexico). Quat Sci Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.10.013
  19. Holmes DG (2003) Pulse width modulation for power converters: principles and practice. Thomas A. Lipo, 724 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang J, Higuchi K, Shabbar A (1998) The relationship between the North Atlantic Oscillations and El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 25:2707--2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hudgins L, Friebe C, Mayer M (1993) Wavelet transforms and atmospheric turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 71:3279--3282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jáuregui E (1979) Some aspects of pluviometric fluctuations in Mexico during the last 100 years (in Spanish). Bol Inst Geogr (UNAM) 9:39–64Google Scholar
  23. Jáuregui E (1995) Rainfall fluctuations and tropical storm activity in Mexico. Erdkunde 49:39–48Google Scholar
  24. Jáuregui E (1997) Climate changes in Mexico during the historical and instrumental periods. Quat Int 7:43–44Google Scholar
  25. Jones PD, Mann ME (2004) Climate over past millennia. Rev Geophys 42(2):RG2002, doi: 10.1029/2003RG000143
  26. Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Briffa KR (2003) Pressure-based measures of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO): a comparison and an assessment of changes in the strength of the NAO and in its influence on surface climate parameters. In: Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (eds) The North Atlantic Oscillation, climate significance and environmental impact. Geophys Monogr 134:51–62Google Scholar
  27. Kerr RA (2000) A North Atlantic climate pacemaker for centuries. Science 288:1984–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klaus D (1973) Cold polar outbreaks in the tropics forming on the leeward of the Rocky Mountains. Geofís Int 13:99–143 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  29. Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2000) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part II: continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multiresolution. J Hydrol 238:149--178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lean J (2000) Evolution of the Sun’s spectral irradiance since the Maunder minimum. Geophys Res Lett 27:2425–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lau K-M, Weng H-Y (1995) Climate signal detection using wavelet transform: how to make a time series sing. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:2391–2402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magaña V, Amador J, Medina S (1999) The midsummer droughts over Mexico and Central America. J Climate 12:1577–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magaña V, Vázquez J, Pérez J, Pérez JB (2003) Impact of el Niño on precipitation in Mexico. Geofis Int 42:313–330Google Scholar
  34. McCabe G, Palecki M, Betancourt JL (2004) Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multi-decadal drought frequency in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:4136–4141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mendoza B, Jáuregui E, Díaz-Sandoval R, García-Acosta V, Velasco V, Cordero G (2005) Historical droughts in central Mexico and their relation with El Niño. J Appl Meteorol 44:709–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mendoza B, Velasco V, Jáuregui E (2006) A study of historical droughts in southeastern Mexico. J Climate 19:2916–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mosiño P, García E (1966) The midsummer droughts in Mexico. In: Proc. Regional Latinamerican Conference, Int. Geophys. Union, Latin American Chapter 3, pp 500–516Google Scholar
  38. Ogurtsov MG, Nagovitsyn YuA, Kocharov GE, Jungner H (2002) Long-period cycles of the sun’s activity recorded in direct solar data and proxies. Sol Phys 211:371–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ortlieb L (2000) The documented historical record of El Niño events in Peru: An update of the Quinn record (sixteenth through nineteenth centuries). In: Diaz HF, Markgraf V (eds) El Niño and the Southern Oscillation Multiscale Variability and Global and Regional Impact. Cambridge University Press, pp 207–295Google Scholar
  40. Pozo-Vazquez D, Esteban-Parra M, Rodrigo F, Castro-Diez Y (2001) A study of NAO variability and its possible non-linear influences on European surface temperature. Clim Dyn 17:701--715Google Scholar
  41. Quinn WH, Neal VT (1992) The historical record of El Niño events. In: Bradley RS, Jones PD (eds) Climate since a.d. 1500. Routledge, London, pp 623–648Google Scholar
  42. Ropelewski C, Halpert M (1986) North American precipitation and temperature patterns associated with El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Mon Weather Rev 114:2353–2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ropelewski C, Halpert M (1989) Precipitation patterns associated with the high phase of the Southern Oscillation. J Climate 2:268–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlesinger ME, Ramankutty N (1994) An oscillation in the global climate system of periods 65–70 years. Nature 367:723–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schultz D, Bracken E, Bosart L, Hakim G, Bedrick M, Dickinson M, Tyle K (1997) The 1993 superstorm cold surge frontal structure and tropical impact. Mon Weather Rev 125:5–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Torrence C, Compo G (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torrence C, Webster P (1999) Interdecadal changes in the ENSO–monsoon system. J Clim 12:2679–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blanca Mendoza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Virginia García-Acosta
    • 2
  • Victor Velasco
    • 1
  • Ernesto Jáuregui
    • 1
  • Rosa Díaz-Sandoval
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoCiudad UniversitariaMéxicoMéxico
  2. 2.Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología SocialMéxicoMéxico

Personalised recommendations