Climatic Change

, Volume 81, Supplement 1, pp 7–30

A summary of the PRUDENCE model projections of changes in European climate by the end of this century

  • Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen
  • Ole Bøssing Christensen
Article

Abstract

An overview of the PRUDENCE fine resolution climate model experiments for Europe is presented in terms of their climate change signals, in particular 2-meter temperature and precipitation. A comparison is made with regard to the seasonal variation in climate change response of the different models participating in the project. In particular, it will be possible to check how representative a particular PRUDENCE regional experiment is of the overall set in terms of seasonal values of temperature and precipitation. This is of relevance for such further studies and impact models that for practical reasons cannot use all the PRUDENCE regional experiments. This paper also provides some guidelines for how to select subsets of the PRUDENCE regional experiments according to such main sources of uncertainty in regional climate simulations as the choice of the emission scenario and of the driving global climate model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buonomo E, Jones RG, Huntingford C, Hannaford J (2007) On the robustness of changes in extreme precipitation over Europe from two high resolution climate change simulations. Q J R Meteorol Soc (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Castro M, Fernández C, Gaertner MA (1993) Description of a meso-scale atmospheric numerical model. In: Díaz JI, Lions JL (eds) Mathematics, climate and environment. MassonGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen JH, Christensen OB, Lopez P, van Meijgaard E, Botzet M (1996) The HIRHAM4 regional atmospheric climate model. DMI Technical Report 96-4. Available from DMI, Lyngbyvej 100, Copenhagen ØGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen JH, Carter TR, Rummukainen M (2007) Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: the PRUDENCE project. Clim Change, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9211-6 (this issue)
  5. Déqué M, Jones RG, Wild M, Giorgi F, Christensen JH, Hassell DC, Vidale PL, Rockel B, Jacob D, Kjellström E, de Castro M, Kucharski F, van den Hurk B (2005) Global high resolution versus Limited Area Model climate change projections over Europe: quantifying confidence level from PRUDENCE results. Clim Dyn, doi:10.1007/S00382-005-0052-1
  6. Déqué M, Rowell DP, Lüthi D, Giorgi F, Christensen JH, Rockel B, Jacob D, Kjellström E, de Castro M, van den Hurk B (2007) An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe: assessing uncertainties in model projections. Clim Change, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9228-x (this issue)
  7. Döscher R, Willén U, Jones C, Rutgersson A, Meier HEM, Hansson U, Graham LP (2002) The development of the coupled regional ocean-atmosphere model RCAO. Boreal Environ Res 7:183–192Google Scholar
  8. Gibelin AL, Déqué M (2003) Anthropogenic climate change over the Mediterranean region simulated by a global variable resolution model. Clim Dyn 20:327–339Google Scholar
  9. Giorgi F, Mearns LO (1999) Regional climate modeling revisited: an introduction to the special issue. J Geophys Res 104(D6):6335–6352Google Scholar
  10. Hewitt CD, Griggs DJ (2004) Ensembles-based predictions of climate changes and their impacts. Eos 85:566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis, contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Houghton JT et al (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 881Google Scholar
  12. Jacob D (2001) A note to the simulation of the annual and inter-annual variability of the water budget over the Baltic Sea drainage basin. Meteorol Atmos Phys 77:61–73Google Scholar
  13. Jacob D, Bärring L, Christensen OB, Christensen JH, de Castro M, Déqué M, Giorgi F, Hagemann S, Hirschi M, Jones R, Kjellström E, Lenderink G, Rockel B, Sánchez E, Schär C, Seneviratne SI, Somot S, van Ulden A, van den Hurk B (2007) An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: design of the experiments and model performance. Clim Change, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9213-4 (this issue)
  14. Jones RG, Murphy JM, Noguer M (1995) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model I: assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. Q J R Meteorol Soc 121:1413–1449Google Scholar
  15. Jones CG, Willén U, Ullerstig A, Hansson U (2004) The Rossby centre regional atmospheric climate model part I: model climatology and performance for the present climate over Europe. Ambio 33:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kjellström E, Döscher R, Meier M (2005) Atmospheric response to different sea surface temperatures in the Baltic Sea: coupled versus uncoupled regional climate model experiments. Nord Hydrol 36:397–409Google Scholar
  17. Kjellström E, Ruosteenoja K (2007) Present-day and future precipitation in the Baltic Sea region as simulated in a suite of regional climate models. Clim Change, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9219-y (this issue)
  18. Lenderink G, van den Hurk B, van Meijgaard E, van Ulden A, Cuijpers H (2003) Simulation of present-day climate in RACMO2: first results and model developments. KNMI Technical Report 252, 24 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Meier HEM, Döscher R, Faxén T (2003) A multiprocessor coupled ice-ocean model for the Baltic Sea. Application to the salt inflow. J Geophys Res 108(C8):3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moberg A, Jones PD (2004) Regional climate model simulations of daily maximum and minimum near-surface temperatures across Europe compared with observed station data 1961–1990. Clim Dyn 23:695–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakićenović N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A et al (2000) Emission scenarios. A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, p 599Google Scholar
  23. New M, Hulme M, Jones P (1999) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J Climate 12:829–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer TN, Räisänen J (2002) Quantifying the risk of extreme seasonal precipitation events in a changing climate. Nature 415:512–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of SST, sea ice and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108(D14):4407, doi:10.1029/2002JD002670, 2003
  26. Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Christoph M, Claussen M, Dümenil L, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (1996) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: model description and simulation of present-day climate. MPI Report 218, p 90, Max-Planck-Insitut für MeteorologieGoogle Scholar
  27. Stainforth DA, Aina T, Christensen C, Collins M, Faull N, Frame DJ, Kettleborough JA, Knight S, Martin A, Murphy JM, Piani C, Sexton D, Smith LA, Spicer RA, Thorpe AJ, Allen MR (2004) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steppeler J, Doms G, Schättler U, Bitzer HW, Gassmann A, Damrath U, Gregoric G (2003) Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM. Meteorol Atmos Phys 82:75–96Google Scholar
  29. Vidale PL, Lüthi D, Frei C, Seneviratne S, Schär C (2003) Predictability and uncertainty in a regional climate model. J Geophys Res 108(D18):4586, doi:10.1029/2002JD002810

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen
    • 1
  • Ole Bøssing Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish Meteorological InstituteCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations