Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 82, Issue 1–2, pp 93–111 | Cite as

Context and climate change: an integrated assessment for Barrow, Alaska

  • Amanda H. LynchEmail author
  • Ronald D. Brunner
Article

Abstract

An intensive approach to Barrow, Alaska’s adaptations to climate change and variability during recent decades suggests reconsideration of the interconnected roles of science, policy, and decision-making structures. First, profound uncertainties are inherent in unique interactions among the many natural and human factors affecting Barrow’s vulnerability. Science cannot significantly reduce these uncertainties through extensive approaches, but intensive approaches can reconstruct and update local trends, clarify the underlying dynamics, and harvest experience for policy purposes. Second, sound policies to reduce Barrow’s vulnerability to coastal erosion and flooding must incorporate these profound uncertainties and the multiple values of the community. Minimizing vulnerability to climate change is only one of the community’s interests, and must compete with other interests for limited time, attention, funds and other resources. Third, the community itself is in the best position to understand its own context, to decide on sound policies, and to take responsibility for those decisions. In short, local context matters in science, policy, and decision-making structures for adaptation to climate change and variability. Overall, cognitive constraints may be the most important human dimension of climate change. Factoring the global problem into more tractable local problems would make the most of our cognitive capacity.

Keywords

Storm Surge Coastal Erosion North Slope Beach Nourishment Sound Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmaogak Sr GN (2000) Storm summary report: memorandum with attachments to the North Slope Borough AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmaogak Sr GN (2001) Letter to Colonel Steven T. Perrenot, Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army Engineer District, Anchorage, Alaska. Barrow: North Slope Borough Mayor’s Office, April 24, 2Google Scholar
  3. Anon (1963a) Arctic Disaster: Storm loss estimated at $1 million. Tundra Times, 1Google Scholar
  4. Anon (1963b) Intense Barrow Storm Causes Near Tragedies: Guy Okakok, Tundra Times Writer, Loses His Home. Tundra Times, 7Google Scholar
  5. Anon (1986) Big storms follow visit from past ancestor; a doomed house is saved. The Open Lead, 38–47Google Scholar
  6. Anon (1989) North Slope: At last, the storms have passed. Barrow Sun, 1:7Google Scholar
  7. Are FE (1999) The role of coastal retreat for sedimentation in the Laptev Sea. In: Kassens H, et al (eds) Land-Ocean Systems in the Siberian Arctic. Springer, 287–295Google Scholar
  8. Brown F (1997) Barrow and Wainwright Beach Nourishment Program. Report, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  9. Brunner RD (1999) Predictions and policy decisions. Technol Forecast Soc Change 62:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunner RD (2002) Problems of Governance. Finding Common Ground: Governance and Natural Resources in the American West, Yale University Press, 1–47Google Scholar
  11. Brunner RD, Lynch AH, Pardikes J, Cassano EN, Lestak L, Vogel J (2004) An Arctic disaster and its policy implications. Arctic 57:336–346Google Scholar
  12. Brunner, RD, Steelman, TA (2005) Beyond Scientific Management. Adaptive Governance, Columbia University Press, 1–46Google Scholar
  13. BTS/LCMF (1989) Mitigation alternatives for coastal erosion at Wainwright and Barrow, Alaska: Active and Passive Considerations. Report, I–III, 1–14, pp 47–50Google Scholar
  14. Chronic, S (2000) 1999 Barrow Beach Nourishment Post-Season Report. Anchorage and Barrow, LCMF, 3pp. plus attachmentsGoogle Scholar
  15. Coastal Frontiers (1989) Beach Nourishment as It Applies to Coastal Protection: Eighteen Documents. ReportGoogle Scholar
  16. Coe-Juell, L (2005) The Oregon Plan: a new way of doing business. Adaptive Governance, Columbia University Press, 181–220Google Scholar
  17. Cromley, CM (2005) Community-based forestry goes to Washington. Adaptive Governance, Columbia University Press, 221–267Google Scholar
  18. Ducote Engineering Association, I (1990) Review of Existing Beach Nourishment Projects. Review 456Google Scholar
  19. Eningowuk L (2004) Testimony of the Shishmaref Erosion and Relocation Coalition, Anchorage, AK, 30 June 2004. Committee on Appropriations of the U.S. SenateGoogle Scholar
  20. GAO (2003) Alaska Native villages: most are affected by flooding and erosion, but few qualify for federal assistance. GAO-04-142Google Scholar
  21. Glenn A (1991) Can the Past be Saved? Symposium on the Erosion of Archaeological Sites on the North Slope, AK, BarrowGoogle Scholar
  22. Gloersen P, Parkinson CL, Cavalieri DJ, Comiso JC, Zwally HJ (1999) Spatial distribution of trends and seasonality in the hemispheric sea ice covers: 1978–1996. J Geophys Res 104:20827–20835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harper JR (1978) Coastal Erosion Rates Along The Chukchi Sea Coast Near Barrow, Alaska. Arctic 31:428–433Google Scholar
  24. Hess B (1993) Taking Control: The North Slope Borough: The Story of Self Determination in the Arctic. North Slope Borough Public Information Division, pp 148Google Scholar
  25. Hume JD, Schalk M (1967) Shoreline processes near Barrow, Alaska: A comparison of the normal and catastrophic. Arctic 20:86–103Google Scholar
  26. Johannessen OM, Shalina EV, Miles MW (1999) Satellite evidence for an Arctic sea ice cover in transformation. Science 286:1937–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch AH, Cassano EN, Cassano JJ, Lestak LR (2003) Case studies of high wind events in Barrow, Alaska: Climatological context and development processes. Mon Weather Rev 131:719–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch AH, Brunner RD, Cassano EN, Jensen A, Koslow MR, Lestak L, Manley WF, Maslanik JA, Mearns LO, Pocernich M, Sheehan G, Sturtevant P, Tebaldi C (2004) Barrow Climatic and Environmental Conditions and Variations – A Compendium. Technical Edition, pp 124Google Scholar
  29. Manley WF (2004) Spatial analysis of coastal erosion over five decades near Barrow, Alaska. 34th Annual International Arctic Workshop, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  30. Maslanik JA, Serreze MC, Agnew T (1999) On the record reduction in 1998 western Arctic sea-ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 26:1905–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCabe GJ, Clark MP, Serreze MC (2001) Trends in Northern Hemisphere surface cyclone frequency and intensity. J Climate 14:2763–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. North Slope Borough Science Advisory Committee (1994) Beach Nourishment Project. North Slope Borough, 22 pp. plus attachmentsGoogle Scholar
  33. NSB (1999) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the North Slope Borough, Alaska, July 1, 1998–June 30, 1999Google Scholar
  34. NSB (2003) Comprehensive Annual Final Report of the North Slope Borough, Alaska, July 1, 2002–June 30, 2003Google Scholar
  35. Parker MN (1989) Polar lows in the Beaufort Sea. In: Twitchell PF, Rasmussen EA, Davidson KL (eds) Polar and Arctic Lows. Deepak, pp 323–330Google Scholar
  36. Perovich DK, Grenfell TC, Richter-Menge JA, Light B, Tucker III WB, Eicken H (2003) Thin and thinner: sea ice mass balance measurements during SHEBA. J Geophys Res, 108Google Scholar
  37. Pocernich M (in prep) A comprehensive set of methods for analyzing wind data as applied to Barrow, Alaska. Int J ClimatolGoogle Scholar
  38. Proshutinsky AY, Polyakov IV, Johnson MA (1999) Climate states and variability of Arctic ice and water dynamics during 1946–1997. Polar Res 18:135–142Google Scholar
  39. Rock H (1963) Northern natives have learned to live with elements. Tundra Times, 4Google Scholar
  40. Rogers EM (1995) The diffusion of innovations, 4th ed. Free, 519 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Schafer PJ (1966) Computation of a Storm Surge at Barrow, Alaska. Archiv fur Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Serie AGoogle Scholar
  42. Shea J (2005) The Role of State and Local Governments: Perspective from the New England Governors’ Conference. Climate Conference Melbourne 2005, Melbourne, Australia, The Climate GroupGoogle Scholar
  43. Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. MITGoogle Scholar
  44. Solomon SM, Forbes DL, Kierstead B (1994) Coastal impacts of climate change: Beaufort Sea erosion study. Atmospheric Environment Service, Canadian Climate Centre. Report No. 94-2Google Scholar
  45. Stafford JM, Wendler G, Curtis J (2000) Temperature and precipitation of Alaska: 50 year trend analysis. Theor Appl Climatol 67:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stierle AP, Eicken H (2002) Sediment inclusions in Alaskan coastal sea ice: spatial distribution, interannual variability, and entrainment requirements. Arct, Antarct Alp Res 34:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sturtevant P, Lestak L, Manley WF, Maslanik JA (2004) Coastal Erosion Along the Chukchi Coast Due to An Extreme Storm Event at Barrow, Alaska. Arctic Coastal Dynamics, Report of an International Workshop, Ber. Polarforsch. MeeresforschGoogle Scholar
  48. Syvitsky J (2002) Sediment transport variability in Arctic rivers: implications for a warmer future. Polar Res 21:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. USACOE (2001) Section 905(b) (WRDA 86) Analysis, Shoreline Erosion, Flooding, and Navigation Channel. Letters and Report, pp 20Google Scholar
  50. USACOE (2002) Project Management Plan: Coastal Storm Damage Reduction, Barrow, Alaska. Report, 1–11, pp 34–37Google Scholar
  51. USACOE (2004) Coastal Storm Damage Reduction, Barrow, Alaska. Science-to-Engineering Workshop, University of Alaska AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker JH (1991) Arctic coastal erosion-An overview. Can the past be saved? Symposium on the erosion of archaeological sites on the North Slope, AK, Barrow, AK, 8–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography and Environmental ScienceMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Center for Public Policy ResearchUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations