Climatic Change

, Volume 80, Issue 3–4, pp 277–299 | Cite as

Potential future changes in water limitations of the terrestrial biosphere

  • Dieter GertenEmail author
  • Sibyll Schaphoff
  • Wolfgang Lucht


This study explores the effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment and climate change on soil moisture (W r ) and biome-level water limitation (L TA), using a dynamic global vegetation and water balance model forced by five different scenarios of change in temperature, precipitation, radiation, and atmospheric CO2 concentration, all based on the same IS92a emission scenario. L TA is defined as an index that quantifies the degree to which transpiration and photosynthesis are co-limited by soil water shortage (high values indicate low water limitation). Soil moisture decreases in many regions by 2071–2100 compared to 1961–1990, though the regional pattern of change differs substantially among the scenarios due primarily to differences in GCM-specific precipitation changes. In terms of L TA, ecosystems in northern temperate latitudes are at greatest risk of increasing water limitation, while in most other latitudes L TA tends to increase (but again varies the regional pattern of change among the scenarios). The frequently opposite direction of change in W r and L TA suggests that decreases in W r are not necessarily felt by actual vegetation, which is attributable mainly to the physiological vegetation response to elevated CO2. Without this beneficial effect, the sign of change in L TA would be reversed from predominantly positive to predominantly negative.


Soil Moisture Gross Primary Production Land Surface Temperature Glob Change Biol Terrestrial Biosphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcamo J, Döll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rösch T, Siebert S (2003) Global estimates of water withdrawals and availability under current and future business-as-usual conditions. Hydrol Sci J 48:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amthor JS (1995) Terrestrial higher-plant response to increasing atmospheric [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle. Glob. Change Biol 1:243–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnell NW (2003) Effects of IPCC SRES emission scenarios on river runoff: a global perspective. Hydrol. Earth Syst Sci 7:619–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnell NW. Liu C (2001) Hydrology and water resources in McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 191–233Google Scholar
  5. Betts RA, Cox PM, Lee SE, Woodward FI (1997) Contrasting physiological and structural vegetation feedbacks in climate change simulations. Nature 387:796–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts R, Cox PM, Collins M, Harris PP, Huntingford C, Jones CD (2004) The role of ecosystem – atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest dieback under global climate warming Theor Appl Clim 78, doi:10.1007/s00704-004-0050-yGoogle Scholar
  7. Bondeau A, Smith PC, Zaehle S, Schaphoff S, Lucht W, Cramer W, Gerten D, Lotze-Campen H, Müller C, Reichstein M, Smith B. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob Change Biol (submitted)Google Scholar
  8. Cao MK, Woodward FI (1998) Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change, Nature 393:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalecki EL, Gleick PH (1999) A framework of ordered climate effects on water resources: a comprehensive bibliography. J Am Water Assoc, 35:1657–1665Google Scholar
  10. Churkina G, Running SW (1998) Contrasting climatic controls on the estimated productivity of global terrestrial biomes Ecosyst 1:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claussen M, Brovkin V, Petoukhov V, Ganopolski A (2001) Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks of large-scale land-cover change. Geophys Res Lett 26:1011–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI, Prentice IC, Betts RA, Brovkin V, Cox PM, Fisher V, Foley J, Friend A D, Kucharik C, Lomas MR, Ramankutty N, Sitch S, Smith B, White A, Young-Molling C (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Glob Change Biol 7:357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cramer W, Bondeau A, Schaphoff S, Lucht W, Smith B, Sitch S (2004) Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle: Impacts of atmospheric CO2, climate change and rate of deforestation, Phil Trans Roy Soc B 359:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curtis PS, Wang X (1998) A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant biomass, form, and physiology, Oecologia 113:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. d'Odorico P, Ridolfi L, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2000) Preferential states of seasonal soil moisture: the impact of climate fluctuations, Water Resour Res 36:2209–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Döll P (2002) Impact of climate change and variability on irrigation requirements: a global perspective, Clim. Change 54:269–293Google Scholar
  17. Emori S, Nozawa T, Abe-Ouchi A, Numaguti A, Kimoto M (1999) Coupled ocean-atmosphere model experiments of future climate change with an explicit representation of sulphate aerosol scattering, J Met Soc Japan 77:1299–1307Google Scholar
  18. Falkenmark M (1997) Meeting water requirements of an expanding world population, Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 352:929–936Google Scholar
  19. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization): (1991) The Digitized Soil Map of the World (Release 1.0), FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. Federer CA (1982) Transpirational supply and demand: plant, soil, and atmospheric effects evaluated by simulation. Water Resour Res 18:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flato GM, Boer GJ (2001) Warming asymmetry in climate change simulations, Geophys Res Lett 28:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerten D, Schaphoff S, Haberlandt U, Lucht W, Sitch S (2004a) Terrestrial vegetation and water balance: hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model, J Hydrol 286:249–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerten D, Bondeau A, Hoff H, Lucht W, Schaphoff S, Smith P (2004b) Assessment of green water fluxes with a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, in Webb B, Arnell N, Onof C, MacIntyre N, Gurney R, Kirby C. (eds.), Hydrology: Science and Practice for the 21st Century, British Hydrological Society, London, Vol I., pp 29–35Google Scholar
  24. Gerten D, Haberlandt U, Cramer W, Erhard M (2005a) Terrestrial carbon and water fluxes, In: Hantel M (ed), Observed Global Climate. Landolt-Börnstein New Series, Group V: Geophysics, Vol. 6, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 12-1-12-17Google Scholar
  25. Gerten D, Lucht W, Schaphoff S, Cramer W, Hickler T, Wagner, W (2005b) Hydrologic resilience of the terrestrial biosphere. Geophys Res Lett 32:L21408, doi: 10.1029/2005GL024247Google Scholar
  26. Gifford RM, Barrett DJ, Lutze JL, Samarakoon A B (2000) The CO2 fertilizing effect: relevance to the global carbon cycle, in Wigley TML, Schimel DS (eds), The carbon cycle, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–92Google Scholar
  27. Gitay H, Brown S, Easterling W, Jallow B (2001) Ecosystems and their goods and services, In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 235–342.Google Scholar
  28. Gordon WS, Famiglietti JS (2004) Response of the water balance to climate change in the United States over the 20th and 21st centuries: results from the VEMAP Phase 2 model intercomparisons. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18 GB 1030, doi:10.1029/2003GB002098Google Scholar
  29. Gordon C, Cooper C, Senior CA, Banks HT, Gregory J M, Johns TC, Mitchell JFB, Wood RA (2000) The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dyn 16:147–168Google Scholar
  30. Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB, Brady AJ (1997) Summer drought in northern midlatitudes in a time-dependent CO2 climate experiment. J Climate 10:662–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haxeltine A, Prentice IC (1996a) BIOME3: an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 10:693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haxeltine A, Prentice IC (1996b) A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production. Funct Ecol 10:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change, Nature 424:901–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hickler T, Prentice IC, Smith B, Sykes, MT (2004) Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on productivity at the Duke Forest FACE experiment: a test of the dynamic global vegetation model LPJ, In: Hickler T (ed) Towards an integrated ecology through mechanistic modelling of ecosystem structure and functioning, Doctoral Thesis, Lund University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirst AC, Gordon HB, O'Farrell SP (1996) Global warming in a coupled climate model including oceanic eddy-induced advection, Geophys Res Lett 23:3361–3364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK (eds) (1992) Climate Change 1992: the Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Hungate BA, Dukes JS, Shaw R, Luo Y, Field C B (2003) Nitrogen and climate change, Science 302:1512–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huntingford C, Monteith JL (1998) The behaviour of a mixed-layer model of the convective boundary layer coupled to a big leaf model of surface energy partitioning. Bound-Lay. Meteorol 88:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Joos F, Prentice IC, Sitch S, Meyer R, Hooss G, Plattner G-K, Gerber S, Hasselmann K (2001) Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission scenarios. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15:891–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kergoat L, Lafont S, Douville H, Berthelot B, Dedieu G, Planton S, Royer J-F (2002) Impact of 2 × CO2 on global scale leaf area index and evapotranspiration: conflicting stomatal and LAI responses. J Geophys Res 107:10.1029/2001JD001245Google Scholar
  41. Kimball BA, LaMorte RL, Pinter PJ, Jr, Wall GW, Hunsaker DJ, Adamsen FJ, Leavitt SW, Thompson TL, Matthias AD, Brooks TJ (1999) Free-air CO2-enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on energy balance and evapotranspiration of wheat, Water Resour Res 35:1179–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee D, Veizer J (2003) Water and carbon cycles in the Mississippi River basin: potential implications for the Northern Hemisphere residual terrestrial sink, Glob. Biogeochem Cycles 17:doi:10.1029/2002GB001984Google Scholar
  43. Leipprand A, Gerten D (2006) Global effects of doubled atmospheric CO2 content on evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and runoff, Hydrol Sci J, 51:171–185Google Scholar
  44. Levis S, Foley JA, Pollard D (2000) Large-scale vegetation feedbacks on a doubled CO2 climate J Clim 13:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lockwood JG (1999) Is potential evapotranspiration and its relationship with actual evapotranspiration sensitive to elevated atmospheric CO2 levels? Clim Change 41:193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucht W, Prentice IC, Myneni RB, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Cramer W, Bousquet P, Buermann W, Smith B (2002) Climatic control of the high-latitude vegetation greening trend and Pinatubo effect. Science 296:1687–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGuire AD, Sitch S, Clein JS, Dargaville R, Esser G, Foley J, Heimann M, Joos F, Kaplan J, Kicklighter D W, Meier RA, Melillo JM, Moore B III, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Reichenau T, Schloss A, Tian H, Williams LJ, Wittenberg U (2001) Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process-based ecosystem models, Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15:183–206Google Scholar
  48. Medlyn BE, Badeck FW, de Pury DGG, Barton CVM, Broadmeadow M, Ceulemans R, de Angelis P, Forstreuter M, Jach ME, Kellomäki, S, Laitat E, Marek M, Philippot S, Rey A, Strassemeyer J, Laitinen K, Liozon R, Portier B, Roberntz P, Wang K, Jarvis PG (1999) Effects of elevated [CO2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Environ 22:1475–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monteith JL (1995) Accommodation between transpiring vegetation and the convective boundary layer, J. Hydrol 166:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nemani R, White M, Thornton P, Nishida K, Reddy S, Jenkins J, Running S (2002) Recent trends in hydrologic balance have enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink in the United States, Geophys Res Lett 29: doi:10.1029/2002GL014867Google Scholar
  51. Nemani RR, Keeling CD, Hashimoto H, Jolly WM, Piper SC, Tucker CJ, Myneni RB, Running SW (2003) Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999, Science 300:1560–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nepstad D, Lefebvre P, da Silva UL, Tomasella J, Schlesinger P, Solórzano L, Moutinho P, Ray D, Benito JG (2004) Amazon drought and its implications for forest flammability and tree growth: a basin-wide analysis, Glob Change Biol 10:704–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. New M, Hulme M, Jones P (2000)Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: development of 1901–1996 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Clim 13:2217–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parry ML, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios, Glob Environ Change 14:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Porporato A, Laio F, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2001) Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrological processes and response to water stress. III: Vegetation water stress. Adv Water Res 24:725–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Fasham MJR, Goulden M L, Heimann M, Jaramillo VJ, Kheshgi HS, Le Quéré C, Scholes RJ, Wallace DWR (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide, in Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–237.Google Scholar
  57. Ridolfi L, D'Odorico P, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2000) Impact of climate variability on the vegetation water stress. JGeophys Res 105:18013–18025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roeckner E, Oberhuber JM, Bacher A, Christoph M, Kirchner I (1996) ENSO variability and atmospheric response in a global coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM. Clim Dyn 12:737–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sandstrom K (1995) Modeling the effects of rainfall variability on groundwater recharge in semi-arid Tanzania. Nord Hydrol 26:313–330Google Scholar
  60. Schaphoff S, Lucht W, Gerten D, Sitch S, Cramer W, Prentice IC. (2006) Terrestrial biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections. Clim Change 74, doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-9002-5Google Scholar
  61. Sholtis JD, Gunderson CA, Norby RJ, Tissue D T (2004) Persistent stimulation of photosynthesis by elevated CO2 in a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) forest stand. New Phyt 162:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevski S (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob Change Biol 9:161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smakhtin V, Revenga C, Döll P (2004) A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water International 29:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith JAC, Griffiths H (eds) (1993) Water deficits–plant responses from cell to community, Bios Scientific Publ, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephenson NL (1990) Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of the water balance. Am Nat 135:649–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thonicke K, Venevski S, Sitch S, Cramer W (2001) The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:661–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tubiello FN, Ewert F (2002 Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. Euro J Agron 18:57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wagner W, Scipal K, Pathe C, Gerten D, Lucht W, Rudolf B (2003) Evaluation of the agreement between the first global remotely sensed soil moisture data with model and precipitation data. J. Geophys. Res. 108:4611, doi:10.1029/2003JD003663Google Scholar
  70. Wechsung G, Wechsung F, Wall GW, Adamsen FJ, Kimball BA, Pinter PJJr, Lamorte RL, Garcia RL, Kartschall TH (1999) The effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and soil water availability on spatial and seasonal patterns of wheat root growth. Glob Change Biol 5:519–529Google Scholar
  71. Wetherald RT, Manabe S (2002) Simulation of hydrologic changes associated with global warming. J Geophys Res 107:4379, doi:10.1029/2001JD001195Google Scholar
  72. Xiao J, Moody A (2004) Photosynthetic activity of US biomes: responses to the spatial variability and seasonality of precipitation and temperature. Glob Change Biol 10:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yang Y, Watanabe M, Wang Z, Sakura Y, Tang C (2003) Prediction of changes in soil moisture associated with climatic changes and their implications for vegetation changes: WASVES model simulation on Taihang Mountain. China, Clim Change 57:163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zobler L (1986) A world soil file for global climate modelling. NASA Technical Memorandum, 87802Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Gerten
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sibyll Schaphoff
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Lucht
    • 1
  1. 1.Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations