Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 135–156 | Cite as

Learning to Adapt: Organisational Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts

  • Frans Berkhout
  • Julia Hertin
  • David M. Gann
Article

Abstract

Analysis of human adaptation to climate change should be based on realistic models of adaptive behaviour at the level of organisations and individuals. The paper sets out a framework for analysing adaptation to the direct and indirect impacts of climate change in business organisations with new evidence presented from empirical research into adaptation in nine case-study companies. It argues that adaptation to climate change has many similarities with processes of organisational learning. The paper suggests that business organisations face a number of obstacles in learning how to adapt to climate change impacts, especially in relation to the weakness and ambiguity of signals about climate change and the uncertainty about benefits flowing from adaptation measures. Organisations rarely adapt ‘autonomously’, since their adaptive behaviour is influenced by policy and market conditions, and draws on resources external to the organisation. The paper identifies four adaptation strategies that pattern organisational adaptive behaviour.

Keywords

Adaptive Capacity Climate Change Impact Adaptation Measure Climate Sensitivity Climate Change Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burton, I.: 1997, ‘Vulnerability and adaptive response in the context of climate and climate change,’ Climate Change 36(1–2), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, W., Neil, P., Kelly, M., and Huu Ninh, N.: 2001, Living with environmental change: social vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience in Vietnam, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. and Auster, E.: 1986, Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications, in Staw, B. and Cummings, L (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar
  4. Arnell, N. W.: 2003, ‘Effects of IPCC SRES emissions scenarios on river runoff: a global perspective,’ Hydrology and Earth System Science 7, 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnell, N. W. and Delaney, E. K.: 2003, Adapting to climate change: water supply in England and Wales, ADAPT Project paper, Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Southampton, October.Google Scholar
  6. Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L.: 2003, ‘Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited,’ Academy of Management Review 28(2), 238–256.Google Scholar
  7. Chakravarthy, B.: 1982, ‘Adaptation: a promising metaphor for strategic management,’ Academy of Management Review 7(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collis, D. J.: 1994, ‘Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?,’ Strategic Management Journal 15, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G.: 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  10. Daft, R. L. and Weick, K. E.: 1984, ‘Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems,’ Academy of Management Review 9(2), 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downing, T. E., Olsthoorn, A. A., and Tol, R. S. J.: 1996, Climate change and extreme events: altered risks, socio-economic impacts and policy responses, ECU Report No 12/IVM Report No R 96/4, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Easterling, W. E., Crosson, P. R., Rosenberg, N. J., McKenney, M. S., Katz, L. A., and Lemon, K. M.: 1993, ‘Agricultural impacts of and responses to climate change in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas region,’ Climate Change, 24(1–2), 23–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K.: 1989, ‘Building theory from case study research,’ Academy of Management Review 14(3), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Environment Agency: 2001, Water Resources for the Future: A Strategy for England and Wales, Environment Agency, Bristol.Google Scholar
  15. Environment Agency: 2003, Water Resources Planning Guidelines. Supplementary Guidance Note 1: Treatment of Climate Change, Environment Agency, Bristol.Google Scholar
  16. Folke, C. et al.: 2002, Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Edita norstedts tryckeri AB, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  17. Gavetti, D. and Levinthal, D.: 2000, ‘Looking forward and look backward: cognitive and experiential search,’ Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glantz, M. H.: 1988, Societal responses to climate change: forecasting by analogy, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  19. Graves, H. M. and Philipson, M. C.: 2000, Potential implications of climate change in the built environment, FBE Report 2, Foundation for the Built Environment, London.Google Scholar
  20. Herrington, P.: 1996, Climate Change and the Demand for Water, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  21. Hertin, J., Berkhout, F., Delaney, K., and Arnell, N.: 2002, Business and climate change: measuring and enhancing adaptive capacity, Progress report: Preliminary results from the house building and water sector, SPRU/Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Brighton.Google Scholar
  22. Hulme, M. et al.: 2002, Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich.Google Scholar
  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC): 2001, Climate change 2001 – The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R. E., and Turner, B. L.: 1995, Regions at risk: comparisons of threatened environments, United Nations University Press, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, P. M. and Adger, W. N.: 2000, ‘Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation,’ Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitt, B. and March, J. G.: 1988, ‘Organizational Learning,’ Annual Review of Sociology 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lippman, S. and Rummelt, R. P.: 1982, ‘Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition,’ Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. March, J.: 1991, ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,’ Organization Science 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCarthy, J., Canziani, O., Laery, N., Dokken, D., and White, K.: 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. Mendelsohn, R.: 2000, ‘Efficient adaptation to climate change,’ Climatic Change, 45(3–4), 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson, R. and Winter, S.: 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Nonaka, I.: 1994, ‘A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,’ Organization Science 5, 14–37.Google Scholar
  33. Parson, E. A. et al.: 2003, ‘Understanding climatic impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in the United States: Building a capacity for assessment,’ Climatic Change 57(1–2), 9–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reilly, J. and Schimmelpfennig, D.: 2000, ‘Irreversibility, uncertainty and learning: portraits of adaptation to long-term climate change,’ Climatic Change 45, 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider, S. H., Easterling, W. E., and Mearns, L. O.: 2000, ‘Adaptation: sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions and dynamic climatic changes,’ Climatic Change 45, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Wandel, J.: 2000, ‘An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability,’ Climatic Change 45, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Staber, U. and Sydow, J.: 2002, ‘Organizational adaptive capacity – a structuration perspective,’ Journal of Management Inquiry 11(4), 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steinbrunner, J.: 1974, The cybernetic theory of decision, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  39. Teece, D., Pisonao, G., and Shuen, A.: 1997, ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,’ Strategic Management Journal 18, 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tol, R. S. J., Fankhauser, S., and Smith, J. B.: 1998, ‘The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature?,’ Global Environmental Change - Human and Policy Dimensions 8(2), 109–123.Google Scholar
  41. UK Water Industry Research: 2002, Uncertainty and Risk in Supply/Demand Forecasting – Final Report (Volumes A and B), Project Report CL-09, UKWIR Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  42. Yohe, G., Neumann, J. E., Marshall, P. B., and Ameden, H.: 1996, ‘The economic cost of greenhouse induced sea level rise for developed property in the United States. Climatic Change,’ 32(4), 387–410.Google Scholar
  43. Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G.: 2002, ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities,’ Organization Science 13 (3), 339–351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Earth and Life SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherland
  2. 2.SPRU-Science and Technology Policy ResearchUniversity of SussexSussexUK
  3. 3.Innovation Studies Centre, Tanaka Business School and Civil & Environmental EngineeringImperial CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations