Climatic Change

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 203–215 | Cite as

The Role of Markets and Governments in Helping Society Adapt to a Changing Climate



This paper provides an economic perspective of adaptation to climate change. The paper specifically examines the role of markets and government in efficient adaptation responses. For adaptations to be efficient, the benefits from following adaptations must exceed the costs. For private market goods, market actors will follow this principle in their own interest. For public goods, governments must take on this responsibility. Governments must also be careful to design institutions that encourage efficiency or they could inadvertently increase the damages from climate change. Finally, although in a few cases actors must anticipate climate changes far into the future, generally it is best to learn and then act with respect to adaptation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R., Rosenzweig, C., Pearl, R., Ritchie, J., McCarl, B., Glyer, J., Curry, R., Jones, J., Boote, K., and Allen, L.: 1990, ‘Global climate change and US Agriculture,’ Nature 345, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R., Fleming, R., Chang, C., McCarl, B., and Rosenzweig, C.: 1993, ‘A reassessment of the economic effects of global climate change in us agriculture,’ US Environmental Protection Agency, Wash. D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R., McCarl, B., Segerson, K., Rosenzweig, C., Bryant, K. J., Dixon, B. L., Conner, R., Evenson, R. E., and Ojima, D.: 1999, ‘The economic effects of climate change on US Agriculture,’ in Mendelsohn, R. and Neumann, J. (eds.), The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 18–54.Google Scholar
  4. Houghton, J., Ding, Y., Griggs, D., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson C.: 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Howitt, R. and Tauber, M.: 2003, ‘Impacts of Climate Change on California's Agricultural Water Demand,’ Appendix X, Report for California Energy Commission.
  6. Hurd, B., Callaway, J., Smith, J., and Kirshen, P.O.: 1999, ‘Economic effects of climate change on us water resources,’ in Mendelsohn, R. and Neumann, J. (eds.), The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 133–177.Google Scholar
  7. Joyce, L.: 1995, ‘Productivity of America's Forests and Climate Change,’ General Technical Report RM-271. Fort Collins, CO USFS.Google Scholar
  8. Kaiser, H., Riha, S., Wilkes, D., and Sampath, R.: 1993a, ‘Adaptation to global climate change at the farm Level,’ in Kaiser, H. and Drennen, T. (eds.), Agricultural Dimensions of Global Climate Change, St. Lucie Press: Delray Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  9. Kaiser, H. M., Riha, S. J., Wilkes, D. S., Rossiter, D. G., and Sampath, R. K.: 1993b, ‘A farm-level analysis of economic and agronomic impacts of gradual warming,’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lenihan, J. M., Drapek, R., Bachelet, D., and Neilson, R. P.: 2003, ‘Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in california,’ Ecological Applications 13(6), 1667—1681.Google Scholar
  11. Lund, J., Howitt, R. E., Jenkins, M. W., Zhu, T., Tanaka, S., Pulido, M., Tauber, M., Ritzema, R., Ferriera, I.: 2003, ‘Climate Warming and California's Water Future,’ Center for Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Report No. 03-1, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA,
  12. Makki, S. and Somwaru, A.: 2001, ‘Asymmetric Information in the Market for Yield and Revenue Insurance,’ USDA Economic Research Service. Technical Bulletin No. (TB1892), pp.1–40.Google Scholar
  13. McCarthy, J., Canziani, O., Leary, N., Dokken, D., and White, K. (eds.): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Melillo, J., McGuire, D., Kicklighter, D., Moore, B. III, Vorosmarty, C., and Schloss, A.: 1993, ‘Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production,’ Nature 363, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mendelsohn, R. and Bennett, L.: 1997, ‘Global warming and water management: water allocation and project evaluation,’ Climatic Change 37, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendelsohn, R.: 2000, ‘Efficient adaptation to climate change,’ Climatic Change 45, 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendelsohn, R. and Dinar, A.: 2003, ‘Climate, water, and agriculture,’ Land Economics 79, 328–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendelsohn, R.: 2003, ‘Assessing the market damages from climate change,’ in Griffin, J. (ed.), Global Climate Change: The Science, Economics, and Politics, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp. 92–113.Google Scholar
  19. Mendelsohn, R. and Williams, L.: 2004, ‘Dynamic forecasts of market impacts of global warming,’ Integrated Assessment 9, 315–333.Google Scholar
  20. Nielson, R., King, G., and Koerper, G.: 1992, ‘Towards a rule-based biome model,’ Landscape Ecology 7, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearce, D., Cline, W., Achanta, A., Fankhauser, S., Pachauri, R., Tol, R., and Vellinga, P.: 1996, ‘The social cost of climate change: greenhouse damage and the benefits of control,’ in Bruce, J., Lee, H., and Haites, E. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–224.Google Scholar
  22. Prentice, C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S., Leemans, R., Monserul, R., and Solomon, A.: 1992, ‘A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties, and climate,’ J. of Physiology. 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, J.: 2003, ‘Biodiversity,’ Appendix V, Report for California Energy Commission,
  24. Tol, R.: 1995, ‘The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations,’ Environment and Development Economics 5, 353–374.Google Scholar
  25. VEMAP: 1995, ‘Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and co2 doubling,’ Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9, 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weiss, H. and Bradley, R.: 2001, ‘What drives Societal Collapse?,’ Science 291, 609–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale University Robert MendelsohnYale FESNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations