Climatic Change

, Volume 76, Issue 3–4, pp 339–359 | Cite as

Trends in Drought Frequency – the Fate of DOC Export From British Peatlands

  • F. WorrallEmail author
  • T. P. Burt
  • J. K. Adamson


There is increasing evidence that drought is leading to increased loss of dissolved organic carbon from upland peats. Therefore, this study endeavours to understand the severity and frequency of the scale of drought responsible for driving the observed changes; and, by reconstructing climatic records, to understand whether such droughts are increasing in severity and frequency. The study suggests that there are two levels of drought severity important in the peatlands: a hydrological drought that causes hydrophobic effects in the upper peat profile lasting 3–4 years in duration, and a more severe biogeochemical drought that triggers new mechanisms of DOC production and decade-long effects. The study uses long term climate data from Central England and Northern England to reconstructs depth to water table for an upland peat catchment back to 1766 and shows that hydrological drought has a return period of 25 years and that biogeochemical drought has a return period of 15.5 years. Statistical modelling of the time series of annual droughts shows only weak evidence for an increasing frequency of severe droughts since 1766, but stronger evidence for the recent past. The return period of drought of sufficient severity to cause biogeochemical response is coming close to the length of effect such a drought would have, i.e. trends in drought frequency mean that peatlands may no longer be resilient to the impact of drought, with dire consequences for the storage of carbon in these environments.


Water Table Return Period Dissolve Organic Carbon Concentration North Atlantic Oscillation Drought Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alm, J., Schulman, L., Walden, J., Nykanen, H., Martikainen, P., and Silvola, J.: 1999, ‘Carbon balance of a boreal peat bog during a year with an exceptional dry summer’, Ecology 80, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. E.: 2002, ‘Carbon accumulation and C/N ratios of peat bogs in north-west Scotland’, Scottish J. Geography 118, 323–341.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, D. and Stewart, D.: 1995, ‘The installation and use of a snow pillow to monitor snow water equivalent’, J. Chartered Inst. Water & Environ. Manage 9. 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaney, C. and Criddle, W. D.: 1962, ‘Determining consumptive use and irrigation water requirements’, USDA(ARS) Technical Bulletin 1275.Google Scholar
  5. Bobee, B. and Ashkar, F.: 1991, ‘The gamma family and derived distributions applied in hydrology’, Water Resource Publications, Colorado, pp. 205.Google Scholar
  6. Bouchard, A.: 1997, ‘Recent lake acidification and recovery trends in southern Quebec, Canada’, Water Air & Soil Pollution 94, 225–245.Google Scholar
  7. Bubier, J. L., Crill, P., Mosedale, A., Frolking, S., and Linder, E.: 2003, ‘Peatland responses to varying interannual moisture conditions as measured by automatic CO2 chambers’, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17, 1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt, T. P., Adamson, J. K., and Lane, A. M. J.: 1998, ‘Long-term rainfall and streamflow records for north central England: Putting the environmental change network site at moor house, upper teesdale, in context’, Hydrological Sciences Journal 43, 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cannell, M. G. R., Milne, R., Hargreaves, K. J., Brown, T. A. W., Cruickshank, M. M., Bradley, R. I., Spencer, T., Hope, D., Billett, M. F., Adger, W. N., and Subak, S.: 1999, ‘National inventories of terrestrial carbon sources and sinks: The UK experience’, Climatic Change 42, 505–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, T. R., Jonasson, S., Michelson, A., Callaghan, T. V., and Haystrom, M.: 1998, ‘Environmental controls on soil respiration in the Eurasian and Greenlandic Arctic’, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmosphers 103, 29015–29021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W. O.: 1975, ‘Crop water requirements’, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. FAO, United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  12. Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., Changnon, S. A., Karl, T. R., and Mearns, L. O.: 2000, ‘Climate extremes: Observations, modelling and impacts’, Science 289, 2068–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, M. G., Burt, T. P., Holden, J., and Adamson, J. K.: 1999, ‘Runoff generation and water table fluctuations in blanket peat: Evidence from UK data spanning the dry summer of 1995’, J. Hydrol. 221, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fowler, H. J. and Kilsby, C. G.: 2002, ‘Precipitation and the North Atlantic Oscillation: A study of climatic variability in northern England’, Internationasl Jour Climatiology 22, 843–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, C., Evans, C. D., Montieth, D. T., Reynolds, B., and Fenner, N.: 2001a, ‘Export of organic carbon from peat soils’, Nature 412, 785–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, C., Ostle, N., and Kang, H.: 2001b, ‘An enzymic ‘latch’ on a global carbon store – a shortage of oxygen locks up carbon in peatlands by restraining a single enzyme’, Nature 409, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garnett, M. H., Ineson, P., and Stevenson, A.C.: 2000, ’Effects of burning and grazing on carbon sequestration in a pennine blanket bog, UK’, The Holocene 10, 729–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greive, I. C.: 1990, ‘Soil and soil solution chemical composition at three sites within the Loch Dee catchment, SW Scotland’, Journal of Soil Science 41, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffs, T. J., Rouse, W. R., and Waddington, J. M.: 2000. ‘Interannual variability of net ecosystem CO2 exchange at a subartic fen’, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14, 1109–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Groisman, P. Y., Karl, T. R., Easterling, D. R., Knight, R. W., Jamason, P. F., Hennessey, K. J., Suppiah, R., Page, C. M., Wibig, J., Fortuniak, K., Razuvaez, V. N., Douglas, A., Forland, E., and Zhai, P. M.: 1999, ‘Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: Important indicators of climate change’, Climatic Change 42, 243–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gumbel, E. J.: 1963, ‘Statistical forecast of droughts’, Bull. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. 8, 5–23.Google Scholar
  22. Hisdal, H., Stahl, K., Tallaksen, L. M., and Demuth, S.: 2001, ‘Have streamflow droughts in Europe more severe of frequent?’, International Jour Climatology 21, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden, J.: 2000, ‘Runoff production in blanket peat covered catchments’, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
  24. Hurrell, J. W.: 1995, ‘Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation’, Science 269, 676–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hurrell, J. W. and van Loom, H.: 1996, ‘Decadal variations in climate associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation’, Climatic Change 36, 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Institute of Hydrology: 1980, ‘Low flow studies. Inst. Hydrology’, Wallingford, Oxon, pp. 175.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, G. A. L. and Dunham, K.: 1963, ‘The geology of Moor house’, Nature Conservancy Council, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, P. D., Jonsson, T., and Wheeler, D.: 1997, ‘Extension to the North Atlantic Oscillation using early instrumental pressure observations from Gibraltar and South-West Iceland’, Int. Jour. of Climatology 17, 1433–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, P. D. and Lister, D. H.: 1998, ‘Riverflow reconstructions for 15 catchments over England and Wales and as assessment of hydrologic drought since 1865’, Int. Jour. of Climatology 18, 999–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kroll, C. N. and Vogel, R. M.: 2002, ‘Probability distribution of low streamflow series in the United States’, Jour. Hydraul. Eng. 7, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loganathan, G. V., Mattejat, P., Kuo, C. Y., and Diskin, M. H.: 1986, ‘Frequency analysis of low flows: hypothetical distribution methods and physically-based approach’, Nordic Hydrology 17, 128–150.Google Scholar
  32. Manley, G.: 1974, ‘Central England temperatures: Monthly means 1659 to 1973’, Quart. Jour. Royal Meteorological Society 100, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuffie, K., Henderson-Sellers, A., Holbrook, N., Kothavala, Z., Balachova, O., and Hoekstra, J.: 1999, ‘Assessing simulations of daily temperature and precipitation variability with global climate models for present and enhanced greenhouse climates’, International Jour. Climatology 19, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell, G. and McDonald, A. T.: 1992, ‘Discolouration of water by peat following induced drought and rainfall simulation’, Water Research 26, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicholson, S. E. and Entekhabi, D.: 1986, ‘The quasi-periodic behaviour of rainfall variability in Africa and its relation to the Southern Oscillation’, Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 26, 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborn, T. J., Hulme, M., Jones, P. D., and Basnett, T. A.: 2000, ‘Observed trends in the daily intensity of United Kingdom precipitation’, International Jour. Climatology 20, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker, D. E., Legg, T. P., and Folland, C. K.: 1992, ‘A new daily central England temperature series, 1772–1991’, International Jour. Climatology 12, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roulet, N. T., Moore, T. R., Bubier, J., and Lafleur, P.: 1992, ‘Northern fens: Methane flux and climatic change’, Tellus 44B, 100–105.Google Scholar
  39. Schlesinger, W. H.: 1990, ‘Evidence from chronosequence studies for a low carbon storage potential of soils’, Nature 348, 232–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shumway, R. H.: 1988, Applied Statistical Time Series Analysis, Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar
  41. Silvola, J., Alm, J., Ahlholm, U., Nykanen, H., and Martikainen, P. J.: 1996, ‘CO2 fluxes from peat in boreal mires under varying temperature and moisture conditions’, J. Ecol. 84, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skjelkvåle, B. L., Mannio, J., Wilander, A., and Andersen, T.: 2001, ‘Recovery from acidification of lakes in Finland, Norway and Sweden 1990–1999’, Hydrol. Earth System Science 5, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smakhtin, V. U.: 2001, ‘Low flow hydrology: A review’, Jour. Hydrology 240, 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sutton, R. T. and Allen, M. R.: 1997. ‘Decadal predictability of North Atlantic sea surface temperature and climate’, Nature 388, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sykes, J. M. and Lane, A. M. J.: 1996, ‘The United Kingdom environmental change network: Protocols for standard measurements of terrestrial sites’, Natural Environment Research Council, London, pp. 220.Google Scholar
  46. Tolonen, K. and Turunen, J.: 1996, ‘Accumulation Rates of Carbon in Mires in Finland and Implications for Climate Change’, The Holocene 6, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tranvik, L. J. and Jansson, M.: 2002, ‘Terrestrial export of organic carbon’, Nature 415, 861–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trumbore, S. E., Bubier, J. L., Harden, J. W., and Crill, P. M.: 1999, ‘Carbon cycling in boreal wetlands: A comparison of three approaches’, . J. Geophysical Res. 104, D22, 27673–27682.Google Scholar
  49. UNFCCC: 2001, Report of the conference of the parties on the second part of the sixth session, held at Bonn, 16th-17th July 2001, FCCC/CP/2001/5, United Nations, Geneva.Google Scholar
  50. Updegraff, K., Pastor, J., Bridgham, S. D., and Johnston, C. A.: 1995, ‘Environmental and substrate controls over carbon and nitrogen mineralization in northern wetlands’, Ecol. Appl. 5, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walling, D. E. and Webb, B. W.: 1985, ‘Estimating the discharge of contaminants to coastal waters by rivers: Some cautionary comments’, Marine Pollution Bulletin 16, 488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Worrall, F. and Burt, T. P.: 1999, ‘A univariate model of river water nitrate time series’, J. Hydrol. 214, 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Worrall, F. and Burt, T. P.: 2004, ‘Time series analysis of long term river DOC records: Evidence for enzymic latch mechanisms?’, Hydrological Processes 18, 893–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Worrall, F., Reed, M., Warburton, J., and Burt, T. P.: 2003a, ‘Carbon budget for British upland peat catchment’, Science of the Total Environment 312, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worrall, F., Burt, T. P., and Shedden, R.: 2003b, ‘Long terms records of riverine carbon flux’, Biogeochemistry 64, 165–178.Google Scholar
  56. Worrall, F., Swank, W. T., and Burt, T. P.: 2003c, ‘Changes in stream nitrate concentrations due to land management practices, ecological succession and climate: Developing a systems approach to integrated catchment response’, Water Resour. Res. 39, Art No. 1177.Google Scholar
  57. Worrall, F., Harriman, R., Evans, C. D., Watts, C., Adamson, J., Neal, C., Tipping, E., Burt, T. P., Grieve, I., Montieth, D., Naden, P. S., Nisbet, T., Reynolds, B., and Stevens, P.: 2004a, ‘Trends in dissolved organic carbon in UK rivers and lakes’, Biogeochemistry 70, 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Worrall, F., Burt, T. P., and Adamson, J.: 2004b, ‘Can climate change explain increases in DOC flux from upland peat catchments?’, Science of the Total Environment 326, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Worrall, F., Burt, T. P., and Adamson, J.: 2005, ‘Predicting the future DOC flux form upland peat catchments’, J. Hydrol. 300, 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Worrall, F., Burt, T. P., and Adamson, J.: ‘Long-term changes in hydrological pathways in an upland peat catchment – recovery from severe drought?’, Hydrol. Process. (in press).Google Scholar
  61. Zaidman, M. D., Keller, V., Young, A. R., and Cadman, D.: 2003, ‘Flow-duration-frequency behaviour of British rivers based on annual minimum data’, Jour. Hydrology 277, 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Geological SciencesScience LaboratoriesDurhamUK
  2. 2.Dept. of GeographyScience LaboratoriesDurhamUK
  3. 3.Environmental Change NetworkCentre for Ecology & HydrologyCumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations