Climatic Change

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 301–329 | Cite as

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking

Article

Abstract

Vulnerability is an emerging concept for climate science and policy. Over the past decade, efforts to assess vulnerability to climate change triggered a process of theory development and assessment practice, which is reflected in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This paper reviews the historical development of the conceptual ideas underpinning assessments of vulnerability to climate change. We distinguish climate impact assessment, first- and second-generation vulnerability assessment, and adaptation policy assessment. The different generations of assessments are described by means of a conceptual framework that defines key concepts of the assessment and their analytical relationships. The purpose of this conceptual framework is two-fold: first, to present a consistent visual glossary of the main concepts underlying the IPCC approach to vulnerability and its assessment; second, to show the evolution of vulnerability assessments. This evolution is characterized by the progressive inclusion of non-climatic determinants of vulnerability to climate change, including adaptive capacity, and the shift from estimating expected damages to attempting to reduce them. We hope that this paper improves the understanding of the main approaches to climate change vulnerability assessment and their evolution, not only within the climate change community but also among researchers from other scientific communities, who are sometimes puzzled by the unfamiliar use of technical terms in the context of climate change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger, W. N.: 1999, ‘Social vulnerabililty to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam’, World Dev. 27, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N. and Kelly, M.: 1999, ‘Social vulnerabililty to climate change and the architecture of entitlements’, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 4, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, M. T. and Reid, W.: 2002, ‘Millennium ecosystem assessment. A healthy drive for an ailing planet’, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 9, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcamo, J., Kreileman, E., Krol, M., Leemans, R., Bollen, J., van Minnen, J., Schaeffer, M., Toet, S., and de Vries, B.: 1998, ‘Global modelling of environmental change: An overview of IMAGE 2.1’, in Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., and Kreileman, E. (eds.), Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model. Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 3–94.Google Scholar
  5. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., and Wisner, B.: 1994, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bohle, H.-G., Downing, T. E., and Watts, M. J.: 1994, ‘Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity’, Global Environ. Change 4, 37– 48.Google Scholar
  7. Brooke, C.: 2002, Climate Change, Vulnerability and Conservation in Costa Rica: An Investigation of Impacts, Adaptive Environmental Management and National Adaptation Networks, Ph.D. thesis, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, N.: 2003, Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework, Working Paper 38, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Burton, I.: 1997, ‘Vulnerability and adaptive responses in the context of climate and climate change’, Clim. Change 36, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton, I., Huq, S., Lim, B., Pilifosova, O., and Schipper, E. L.: 2002, ‘From impact assessment to adaptation priorities: The shaping of adaptation policy’, Climate Policy 2, 145– 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, S. J., Miller, K. A., Hamlet, A. F., and Avis, W.: 2000, ‘Climate change and resource management in the Columbia river basin’, Water Int. 25, 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubasch, U., Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Stouffer, R. J., Dix, M., Noda, A., Senior, C. A., Raper, S., and Yap, K. S.: 2001, ‘Projections of future climate change’, in Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis (Chapter 9), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Cutter, S. L.: 1996, ‘Vulnerability to environmental hazards’, Prog. Hum. Geogr. 20, 529– 539.Google Scholar
  14. Dilley, M. and Boudreau, T. E.: 2001, ‘Coming to terms with vulnerability: A critique of the food security definition’, Food Policy 26, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dow, K.: 1992, ‘Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change’, Geoforum 23, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dowlatabadi, H.: 1995, ‘Integrated assessment models of climate change: An incomplete overview’, Energy Policy 23, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downing, T. E., Butterfield, R., Cohen, S., Huq, S., Moss, R., Rahman, A., Sokona, Y., and Stephen, L.: 2001, Climate Change Vulnerability: Linking Impacts and Adaptation. Report to the Governing Council of the United Nations Programme. United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  18. Downing, T. E., Harrison, P. A., Butterfield, R. E., and Lonsdale, K. G.: 2000, Climate Change, Climatic Variability and Agriculture in Europe. An Integrated Assessment, Research Report No. 21 (Contract ENV4-CT95-0154), Commission of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  19. Downing, T. E. and Patwardhan, A.: 2003, Vulnerability Assessment for Climate Adaptation, APF Technical Paper 3, United Nations Development Programme, New York City, NY. Final draft.Google Scholar
  20. Ford, J.: 2002, Vulnerability: Concepts and Issues, Ph.D. Scholarly Field Paper, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Füssel, H.-M.: 2003, ‘The ICLIPS Impacts Tool: A graphical user interface to climate impact response functions for integrated assessments of climate change’, Integr. Assess. 4, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Füssel, H.-M.: 2004, ‘Coevolution of the political and conceptual frameworks for climate change vulnerability assessments’, in Biermann, F., Campe, S., and Jacob K. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change “Knowledge for the Sustainability Transition. The Challenge for Social Science”. Global Governance Project, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 302–320.Google Scholar
  23. new Füssel, H.-M.: 2005, ‘Vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive conceptual framework’, University of California International and Area Studies Breslauer Symposium Paper 6, Berkeley, CA, USA, 36 pp. Available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucias/breslauer/6/.
  24. Füssel, H.-M. and Klein, R. J. T.: 2002, ‘Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments to Climate Change: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking’, in UNDP Expert Group Meeting “Integrating Disaster Reduction and Adaptation to Climate Change”, Havana, Cuba.Google Scholar
  25. Füssel, H.-M. and Klein, R. J. T.: 2004, ‘Conceptual Frameworks of Adaptation to Climate Change and Their Applicability to Human Health’, PIK Report No. 91, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Füssel, H.-M., Klein, R. J. T., and Ebi, K. L.: 2006, ‘Adaptation assessment for public health’, in Menne, B. and Ebi, K. L. (eds.), Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies for Human Health, Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
  27. Füssel, H.-M. and van Minnen, J. G.: 2001, ‘Climate impact response functions for terrestrial ecosystems’, Integr. Assess. 2, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gewin, V.: 2002, ‘The state of the planet’, Nature 417, 112–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., and Xiaosu, D. (eds.): 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. IPCC: 2001, Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E.: 2001, ‘International Workshop on Vulnerability and Global Environmental Change’, SEI Risk and Vulnerability Programme Report 2001–01, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, P. M. and Adger, W. N.: 2000, ‘Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation’, Clim. Change 47, 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenny, G. J., Warrick, R., Mitchell, N., Mullan, A., and Salinger, M.: 1995, ‘CLIMPACTS: An integrated model for assessment of the effects of climate change on the New Zealand environment’, J. Biogeogr. 22, 883–895.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, R. J. T.: 2002, ‘Adaptation to climate variability and change: What is optimal and appropriate?’, in Giupponi, C. and Shechter, M. (eds.), Climate Change and the Mediterranean: Socio – Economics of Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Klein, R. J. T. and MacIver, D. C.: 1999, ‘Adaptation to climate change and variability: Methodological issues’, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 4, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. J., and Mimura, N.: 1999, ‘Coastal adaptation to climate change: Can the IPCC guidelines be applied?’, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 4, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwadijk, J. and Middelkoop, H.: 1994, ‘Estimation of the impact of climate change on the peak discharge probability of the river Rhine’, Clim. Change 27, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leemans, R. and van den Born, G.: 1994, ‘Determining the potential global distribution of natural vegetation, crops and agricultural productivity’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 76, 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lim, B. (ed.): 2001, ‘UNDP–GEF Workshop for Developing an Adaptation Policy Framework for Climate Change. Preliminary Report’, St. Adele, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Liverman, D. M.: 1990, ‘Vulnerability to global environmental change’, in Kasperson, R. E., Dow, K., Golding, D., and Kasperson, J. X. (eds.), Understanding Global Environmental Change: The Contributions of Risk Analysis and Management (Chapter 26), Clark University, Worcester, MA, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
  41. Martens, P.: 1998, Health & Climate Change. Modelling the Impacts of Global Warming and Ozone Depletion, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  42. Martens, W. J. M., Jetten, T. H., and Focks, D. A.: 1997, ‘Sensitivity of malaria, schistosomiasis and dengue to global warming’, Clim. Change 35, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martens, W. J. M., Niessen, L. W., Rotmans, J., Jetten, T. H., and McMichael, A. J.: 1995, ‘Potential impact of global climate change on malaria risk’, Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 458– 464.Google Scholar
  44. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  45. Menne, B. and Ebi, K. L. (eds.): 2005, European Climate Change Health Impact and Adaptation Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press).Google Scholar
  46. Monserud, R. A., Tchebakova, N. M., and Leemans, R.: 1993, ‘Global vegetation change predicted by the modified Budyko model’, Clim. Change 25, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morgan, M. G. and Henrion, M.: 1990, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Moss, R. H., Brenkert, A. L., and Malone, E. L.: 2001, ‘Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Quantitative Approach’, Technical Report PNNL-SA-33642, Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, Richland, WA.Google Scholar
  49. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds.): 2000, Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  50. National Assessment Synthesis Team: 2001, Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  51. Nicholls, R. J. and Leatherman, S. P.: 1995, ‘Potential impacts of accelerated sea-level rise on developing countries’, J. Coastal Res. Special Issue No. 14.Google Scholar
  52. O’Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Schjolen, A., and Nygaard, L.: 2004a, ‘What’s in a Word? Conflicting Interpretations of Vulnerability in Climate Change Research’, CICERO Working Paper 2004:04, CICERO, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  53. O’Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venema, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, H., Javed, A., Bhadwal, S., Barg, S., Nygaard, L., and West, J.: 2004b, ‘Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India’, Global Environ. Change 14, 303–313.Google Scholar
  54. O’Brien, K., Sygna, L., and Haugen, J. E.: 2004c, ‘Vulnerable or resilient? A multi-scale assessment of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway’, Clim. Change 64, 193–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Brien, K. L. and Leichenko, R. M.: 2000, ‘Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization’, Global Environ. Change 10, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olmos, S.: 2001, Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change: Concepts, Issues, Assessment Methods. Climate Change Knowledge Network, http://www.cckn.net.
  57. Prowse, M.: 2003, ‘Towards a Clearer Understanding of ‘Vulnerability’ in Relation to Chronic Poverty’, CPRC Working Paper No. 24, Chronic Poverty Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  58. Ribot, J. C.: 1995, ‘The causal structure of vulnerability: Its application to climate impact analysis’, GeoJournal 35, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenzweig, C. and Parry, M. L.: 1994, ‘Potential impact of climate change on world food supply’, Nature 367, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rothman, D. S. and Robinson, J. B.: 1997, ‘Growing pains: A conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 46, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scheraga, J. D. and Furlow, J.: 2001, ‘From assessment to policy: Lessons learned from the U.S. national assessment’, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 7, 1227–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schneider, S. H.: 1997, ‘Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions’, Environ. Model. Assess. 2, 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Street, R.: 1999, ‘The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment’, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 4, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Wandel, J.: 2000, ‘An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability’, Clim. Change 45, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smit, B. and Pilifosova, O.: 2001, ‘Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity’, in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Chapter 18), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  66. Smithers, J. and Smit, B.: 1997, ‘Human adaptation to climatic variability and change’, Global Environ. Change 7, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Timmermann, P.: 1981, Vulnerability, Resilience and the Collapse of Society, No. 1 in Environmental Monograph, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  68. Toth, F. L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., and Schellnhuber, H.-J.: 2002, ‘Exploring options for global climate policy: A new analytical framework’, Environment 44(5), 22–34.Google Scholar
  69. Turner, B. L., II, Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., and Schiller, A.: 2003, ‘A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. UNDHA: 1993, ‘Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management’, DNA/93/36, United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  71. UNDP: 2003, User’s Guidebook for the Adaptation Policy Framework. Final Draft. United Nations Development Programme, New York City, NY.Google Scholar
  72. UNEP: 2002, Assessing Human Vulnerability due to Environmental Change: Concepts, Issues, Methods and Case Studies. UNEP/DEWA/RS.03-5, United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  73. United Nations General Assembly: 1992, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Yohe, G.: 2001, ‘Mitigative capacity – the mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side’, Clim. Change 49, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yohe, G. and Tol, R. S. J.: 2002, ‘Indicators for social and economic coping capacity – moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity’, Global Environ. Change 12, 25–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Environmental Science and PolicyStanford UniversityStanfordU.S.A.
  2. 2.Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, TelegrafenbergPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations