Climatic Change

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 127–150 | Cite as

Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment

Part 7. Economic Analysis of Field Crops and Land use with Climate Change
Article

Abstract

PNNL’s Agriculture and Land Use is used to demonstrate the impact of potential changes in climate on agricultural production and land use in the United States. AgLU simulates production of four crop types in several world regions, in 15-yr time steps from 1990 to 2095. Changes in yield of major field crops in the United States, for 12 climate scenarios, are obtained from simulations of the EPIC crop growth model. Results from the HUMUS model are used to constrain crop irrigation, and BIOME3 model is used to simulate productivity of unmanaged ecosystems. Assumptions about changes in agricultural productivity outside the United States are treated on a scenario basis, either responding in the same way as in the United States, or not responding to climate.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R. M., Fleming, R. A., Chang, C. C., McCarl, B. A., and Rosenzweig, C.: 1995, ‘A reassessment of the economic effects of global climate change on U.S. agriculture’, Clim. Change 30, 147–167.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D. M., Alig, R. J., Callaway, J. M., McCarl, B. A., and Winnett, S. M.:1996, The Forest and Agricultural Sector Model (FASOM): Model Structure and Policy Applications, Research Paper PNW-RP-495, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R. M., Hurd, B. H., and Reilly, J.: 1999, A Review of impacts to U.S. agricultural resources, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E. 1976, A Land Use And Land Cover Classification System For Use With Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, J. F. and Edmonds, J. A. 1993, ‘Modelling Energy Technologies in a Competitive Market’, Energy Economics 15,(2) 123–129.Google Scholar
  6. Crosson, P. and Anderson, J. R. 2002, Technologies for Meeting Future Global Demands for Food, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 02-02, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, R., Tsigas, M., Lewandrowski, J., and Raneses, A. 1995, World Agriculture and Climate Change: Economic Adaptations, Agricultural Economic Report Number 703, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Edmonds, J. A., Wise, M. A., Sands, R. D., Brown, R. A., and Kheshgi, H. 1996, Agriculture, Land Use, and Commercial Biomass Energy, PNNL-SA-27726, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, G., Frohberg, K. K., Keyzer, M. A., and Parikh, K. S. 1988, Linked National Models: A Tool for International Food Policy Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, G., Frohberg, K., Parry, M. L., and Rosenzweig, C. 1994, ‘Climate change and world food supply, demand and trade: Who benefits, who loses?’ Global Environ. Change 4, 7–23.Google Scholar
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 2003, FAOSTAT data base, http://apps.fao.org.
  12. IPCC: 2001, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  13. Izaurralde, R. C., Thomson, A. M., Rosenberg, N. J., and Brown, R. A. 2004, ‘Climate Change impacts for the conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment, Part 6, Distribution and Productivity of Unmanaged Ecosystems’, Clim. Change (this issue).Google Scholar
  14. Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., and Shaw, D. 1994, ‘The impact of global warming on agriculture: A ricardian analysis’, American Economic Review 84, 753–771.Google Scholar
  15. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): 2003, ‘Land Use/Land Cover’ digital data set at http://spo.nos.noaa.gov//projects//cads//ftp_data_download.html.
  16. Reilly, J., Tubiello, F., McCarl, B., and Melillo, J. 2001, ‘Climate change and agriculture in the United States’, in Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change, National Assessment Synthesis Team, U.S. Global Change Research Program, www.usgcrp.gov
  17. N. J.Rosenberg (ed.) 1993, ‘Towards an integrated assessment of climate change: The MINK study’, Clim. Change 24, 1–173.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., Tiscareno-Lopez, M., Legler, D., Srinivasan R., Brown, R. A., and Sands, R. D. 1997, Sensitivity of North American Agriculture to ENSO-based Climate Scenarios and Their Socio-Economic Consequences: Modeling in an Integrated Assessment Framework. PNNL-11699. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
  19. Rosenzweig, C. and Parry, M. L. 1994, ‘Potential impacts of climate change on world food supply’, Nature 367, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sands, R. D. and Leimbach, M. 2003, ‘Modeling agriculture and land use in an integrated assessment framework’, Climate Change 56, 185–210.Google Scholar
  21. Schimmelpfennig, D., Lewandrowski, J., Reilly, J., Tsigas, M., and Parry, I.1996, Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change: Issues of Long-Run Sustainability, Agricultural Economics Report No. 740, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. J. B.Smith and D.Tirpak (eds.). 1989, The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States, EPA-230-05-89-050, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Thomson, A. M., Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., Brown, R. A., and Wigley, T. M. L. 2004a, ‘Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: An integrated assessment, Part 2, Models and validation’, Climatic Change (this issue).Google Scholar
  24. Thomson, A. M., Brown, R. A., Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., and Benson, V. 2004b, ‘Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: An integrated assessment, Part 3, Dryland production of grain and forage crops’, Climatic Change (this issue).Google Scholar
  25. Thomson, A. M., Brown, R. A., Rosenberg, N. J., Srinivasan, R., and Izaurralde, R. C. 2004c, ‘Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: An integrated assessment, Part 4, Water resources’, Climatic Change (this issue).Google Scholar
  26. Thomson, A. M., Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., and Brown, R. A. 2004d, ‘Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment, Part 5, Irrigated Agriculture and National Grain Crop Production’, Climatic Change (this issue).Google Scholar
  27. United Nations 2001, Long-range World Population Projections: Based on the 1998 Revision, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joint Global Change Research InstituteMarylandU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations