Climatic Change

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 151–162 | Cite as

Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment Summary

Article

Abstract

This special issue of Climatic Change describes an effort to improve methodology for integrated assessment of impacts and consequences of climatic change. Highlights of the seven foregoing Parts (papers) that constitute this special issue are summarized here. The methodology developed involves construction of scenarios of climate change that are used to drive individual sectoral models for simulating impacts on crop production, irrigation demand, water supply and change in productivity and geography of unmanaged ecosystems. Economic impacts of the changes predicted by integrating the results of the several sectoral simulation models are calculated through an agricultural land-use model. While these analyses were conducted for the conterminous United States alone, their global implications are also considered in this summary as is the need for further improvements in integrated assessment methodology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.Alcamo (ed.): 1994, IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R. A., Rosenberg, N. J., Hays, C. J., Easterling, W. E., and Mearns, L. O.: 2000, ‘Potential production and environmental effects of switchgrass and traditional crops under current and greenhouse-altered climate in the Central United States: A simulation study’, Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 78, 31–47.Google Scholar
  3. Easterling, W. E., Rosenberg, N. J., Lemon, K. M., and McKenney, M. S.: 1992, ‘Simulation of crop responses to climate change: Effects with present technology and currently available adjustments (The ‘smart farmer’ scenario)’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 59, 53–73.Google Scholar
  4. Hulme, M., Jiang, T., and Wigley, T.: 1995, SCENGEN: A Climate Change SCENario GENerator: Software User Manual, Version 1.0, Climate Change Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, U. K., 38 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Izaurralde, R. C., Rosenberg, N. J., Brown, R. A., and Thomson, A. M.: 2003, ‘Integrated assessment of Hadley Centre climate change projections on water resources and agricultural productivity in the conterminous United States. II. Regional agricultural productivity in 2030 and 2095’, Agricultural Forestry and Meteorology 117, 97–122.Google Scholar
  6. Morita, T., Matsuoka, Y., et al.: 1993, ‘AIM – Asian Pacific integrated model for evaluating policy options to reduce GHG emissions and global warming impacts’, in Global Warming Issue in Asia, Asian Institute of Technology, pp. 254–273.Google Scholar
  7. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds.): 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 612 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Reilly, J., Tubiello, F., McCarl, B., Abler, D., Darwin, R., Fuglie, K., Hollinger, S., Izaurralde, R.C., Jagtap, S., Jones, J., Meams, L., Ojima, D., Paul, E., Paustian, K., Riha, S., Rosenberg, N. J., and Rosenzweig, C.: 2003, ‘U.S. Agriculture and Climate Change: New Results’, Climatic Change 57, 43–69.Google Scholar
  9. Riahi, K. and Roehrl, R. A.: 2000, ‘Technology dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation: A cost assessment’, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 63, 175–205.Google Scholar
  10. Rosenberg, N. J. and Crosson, P. R.: 1991, ‘The MINK project: A new methodology for identifying regional influences of, and responses to, increasing atmospheric CO2 and climate change’, Environ. Conservation 18(4), 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosenberg, N. J., Brown, R. A., Izaurralde, R. C., and Thomson, A. M.: 2003, ‘Integrated assessment of Hadley Centre climate change projections on water resources and agricultural productivity in the conterminous United States. I. Climate change scenarios and impacts on water resources simulated with the HUMUS model’, Agricultural Forestry and Meteorology 117, 73–96.Google Scholar
  12. Rosenberg, N. J. (ed.): 1993, Towards an Integrated Impact Assessment of Climate Change: The MINK Study, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Yang, X. B., Epstein, P. R., and Chivian, E.: 2000, Climate Change and U.S. Agriculture: The Impacts of Warming and Extreme Weather Events on Productivity, Plant Diseases and Pests, Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 46 pp.Google Scholar
  14. U. S.Global Change Research Program: 2000, Climate Change and America: Overview Document, A Report by the National Assessment Synthesis Team, USGCRP, D.C.WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Wigley, T. M. L.: 1994, SCENGEN: Model Documentation, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, C.O.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joint Global Change Research InstituteMarylandU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations