Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment: From Mink to the ‘Lower 48’

Alcamo, J., Kreileman, G. J. J., Krol, M. S., and Zuidema, G.: 1994a, ‘Modeling the global society–biosphere–climate system: Part 1: Model description and testing,’ in Alcamo, J. (ed.), IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Alcamo, J., Van Den Born, G. J., Bouwman, A. F., de Haan, B. J., Goldewijk, K. K., Klepper, O., Krabec, J., Leemans, R., Olivier, J. G. J., Toet, A. M. C., de Vries, H. J. M., and Van Der Woerd, H. J.: 1994b, ‘Modeling the global society–biosphere–climate system: Part 2: Computed scenarios’, in Alcamo, J. (ed.), IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Cubasch, U., Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Stouffer, R. J., Dix, M., Noda, A., Senior, C. A., Raper, S., and Yap, K. S.: 2002, ‘Projections of future climate change’, in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., and Noguer, M. (eds)., Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar

Dowlatabadi, H. and Ball, M.: 1994, ‘An overview of the integrated climate assessment model version 2’, Presented at the Western Economic Association Conference, 29 June, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar

Dowlatabadi, H. and Morgan, M. G.: 1993, ‘A model framework for integrated studies of the climate problem’, Energy Policy 21, 209–221.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 2001, The Regional Impacts of Climate Change. Chapter 8. North America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar

Manne, A. S., Mendelsohn, R., and Richels, R.: 1995, ‘MERGE – A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies’, Energy Policy 23(1), 17–34.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. G. and Dowlatabadi, H.: 1996, ‘Learning from integrated assessment of climate change’ Climatic Change 34(3–4), 337–368.Google Scholar

Mori, S. and Takahashi, M.: 1999, ‘An integrated assessment model for the evaluation of new energy technologies and food productivity’, Int. J. Global Energy Issues 11(1–4), 1–18.Google Scholar

Mori, S.: 2000, ‘The development of greenhouse gas emissions scenarios using an extension of the MARIA model for the assessment of resource and energy technologies’, Technol. Forecast. Social Change 63(2–3), 289–311.Google Scholar

Morita, T., Kainuma, M., Harasawa, H., Kai, K., and Matsuoka, Y.: 1994, Asian-Pacific Integrated Model for Evaluating Policy Options to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Warming Impacts, Japan Environment Agency, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences: 1992, Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming. Mitigation, Adaptation and the Science Base, NAS Press, pp. 541–566.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W.: 1996, DICE Model Guide [online], Consortium for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), University Center, Mich., CIESIN URL: http://sedac.ciesin.org/mva/DICE/DICEHP.html

Nordhaus, W. and Boyer, J.: 1994, Warming the World: Economics Models of Global Warming, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Prinn, R., Jacoby, H., Sokolov, A., Wang, C., Xiao, X., Yang, Z., Eckhaus, R., Stone, P., Ellerman, D., Melillo, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Kicklighter, D., Holian, G., and Liu, Y.: 1999, ‘Integrated global system model for climate policy assessment: Feedbacks and sensitivity studies’, Climatic Change 41(3–4), 469–546.Google Scholar

Reilly, J., Tubiello, F., McCarl, B., Abler, D., Darwin, R., Fuglie, K., Hollinger, S., Izaurralde, R. C., Jagtap, S., Jones, J., Mearns, L., Ojima, D., Paul, E., Paustian, K., Riha, S., Rosenberg, N. J., and Rosenzweig, C.: 2003, ‘U.S. agriculture and climate change: New results’, Climatic Change 57, 43–67.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. J.: 1982, ‘The increasing CO₂ concentration in the atmosphere and its implication on agricultural productivity. II. Effects through CO₂ induced climate change’, Climatic Change 4, 239–254.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. J.: 1992, ‘Adaptation of agriculture to climatic change’, Climatic Change 21, 385–405.Google Scholar

N. J.Rosenberg (ed.): 1993, ‘Towards an integrated assessment of climate change: The MINK study’, Climatic Change 24(1–2).Google Scholar

Rotmans, J., de Boois, H., and Swart, R. J.: 1990, ‘An integrated model for the assessment of the greenhouse effect: The Dutch approach’, Climate Change 16, 331–356.Google Scholar

Rotmans, J. and de Vries, H. J. M.: 1997, Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar

Sankovski, A., Barbour, W., and Pepper, W.: 2000, ‘Quantification of the IS99 emission scenario storylines using the atmospheric stabilization framework (ASF)’, Technol. Forecast. Social Change 63(2–3).Google Scholar