Climatic Change

, Volume 74, Issue 1–3, pp 47–79 | Cite as

Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere

  • Christian AzarEmail author
  • Kristian Lindgren
  • Eric Larson
  • Kenneth Möllersten


The capture and storage of CO2 from combustion of fossil fuels is gaining attraction as a means to deal with climate change. CO2 emissions from biomass conversion processes can also be captured. If that is done, biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage (BECS) would become a technology that removes CO2 from the atmosphere and at the same time deliver CO2-neutral energy carriers (heat, electricity or hydrogen) to society. Here we present estimates of the costs and conversion efficiency of electricity, hydrogen and heat generation from fossil fuels and biomass with CO2 capture and storage. We then insert these technology characteristics into a global energy and transportation model (GET 5.0), and calculate costs of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentration at 350 and 450 ppm. We find that carbon capture and storage technologies applied to fossil fuels have the potential to reduce the cost of meeting the 350 ppm stabilisation targets by 50% compared to a case where these technologies are not available and by 80% when BECS is allowed. For the 450 ppm scenario, the reduction in costs is 40 and 42%, respectively. Thus, the difference in costs between cases where BECS technologies are allowed and where they are not is marginal for the 450 ppm stabilization target. It is for very low stabilization targets that negative emissions become warranted, and this makes BECS more valuable than in cases with higher stabilization targets. Systematic and stochastic sensitivity analysis is performed. Finally, BECS opens up the possibility to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. But this option should not be seen as an argument in favour of doing nothing about the climate problem now and then switching on this technology if climate change turns out to be a significant problem. It is not likely that BECS can be initiated sufficiently rapidly at a sufficient scale to follow this path to avoiding abrupt and serious climate changes if that would happen.


Fossil Fuel Carbon Capture Pulp Mill Former Soviet Union Permit Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcamo, J. and Kreileman, E.: 1996, ‘Emission scenarios and global climate protection,’ Global Environ. Change, 6, 305–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azar, C., Lindgren, K., and Andersson, B.: 2000, ‘Hydrogen or methanol in the transportation sector – a global scenario study,’ Report to the Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. Azar, C. and Rodhe, H.: 1997, ‘Targets for stabilization of atmospheric CO2,’ Science 276, 1818–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azar, C. and Larson, E.: 2000, ‘Bioenergy and land-use competition in the Northeast of Brazil. A case study in the the Northeast of Brazil,’ Energy Sustain. Dev. IV (3), 64–72.Google Scholar
  5. Azar, C. and Schneider, S. H.: 2001, ‘Are uncertainties in climate and energy systems a justification for stronger near term mitigation policies?, Paper prepared for a Pew Center meeting on timing of climate policies, Washington October 11–12, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Azar, C., Lindgren, K., and Persson, T.: 2001, ‘Carbon sequestration from fossil fuels and biomass – Long-term potentials,’ in Lygnfelt, A., et al., 2001, proceedings from carbon sequestration symposium at Chalmers Oct 26, 2001. Available at∼anly/symp/symp2001.html.
  7. Azar, C. and Schneider, S. H.: 2002, ‘Are the economic costs of stabilizing the atmosphere prohibitive?, Ecologic. Econ. 42, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azar, C., Lindgren, K., and Andersson, B.: 2003, ‘Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints – Cost effective fuel choices in the transportation sector,’ Energy Pol. 31, 961–976.Google Scholar
  9. Azar, C.: 2004, ‘Emerging scarcities – Bioenergy-food competition in a carbon constrained world,’ in Simpson, D., Toman, M., and Ayres, R. (eds.), Scarcity and Growth in the New Millennium. Resources for the future Inc. John Hopkins University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. Baer, P.: 2003, ‘An issue of scenarios: Carbon sequestration as investment and the distribution of risk – An editorial comment – Introduction,’ Clim. Change 59(3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., and van den Broek, R.: 2003, ‘The potential contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply – A review of 17 studies,’ Biomass Bioenergy 25, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berndes, G., Azar, C., Kåberger, T., and Abrahamson, D.: 2001, ‘The feasibility of large-scale wood-based biofuel production – A reassessment of Giampietro et al.,’ Biomass Bioenergy 20, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Börjesson, P. and Gustavsson, L.: 1996, ‘Regional production and utilization of biomass in Sweden,’ Energy 21, 747–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Börjesson, P.: 1996, ‘Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation,’ Biomass Bioenergy 11(4), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrere, R. and Lohman, L.: 1996, Pulping the South. Zed Press, London.Google Scholar
  16. Chiesa, P. and Consonni, S.: 2000, ‘Natural gas fired combined cycles with low CO2 emissions,’ J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 122, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. David, J. and Herzog, H. J.: 2000, ‘The cost of carbon capture,’ in Williams D. J., Durie, R. A., McMullan, P., Paulson, C. A. J., and Smith, A.Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia, 2000, pp. 985–990.Google Scholar
  18. Ekström, C., Blumer, M., Cavani, A., Hedberg, M., Hinderson, A., Svensson, C.-G., Westermark, M., Erlström, M., and Hagenfeldt, S.: 1997, Technologies and costs in Sweden for capture and storage of CO2 from combustion of fossil fuels for production of power, heat, and/or transportation fuels (in Swedish), Vattenfall Utveckling AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. Foster Wheeler: 1996, Decarbonisation of Fossil Fuels, report No. PH2/2, prepared for the executive committee of the Greenhouse Gas R&D Program of the International Energy Agency, Paris, March.Google Scholar
  20. Freund, P. and Davison, J.: 2002, ‘General overview of costs,’ Paper Presented at an IPCC Workshop on Carbon Capture and Storage on November 18–21, 2002, Regina, Canada (
  21. GECR: 2002, Global Environmental Change Report (July 26).Google Scholar
  22. Giles, J.: 2002, ‘Norway sinks ocean carbon study,’ Nature 419, 6.Google Scholar
  23. Göttlicher, G. and Pruschek, R.: 1997, ‘Comparison of CO2 removal systems for fossil-fuelled power plant processes,’ Energy Conversion Manage. 38(Suppl), S173–S178.Google Scholar
  24. Grimston, M. C., Karakoussis, V., Fouquet, R., van der Vorst, P., Pearson, M., and Leach, M.: 2001, ‘The European and global potential of carbon dioxide sequestration in tackling climate change,’ Clim. Pol. 1, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gustavsson, L., Borjesson, P., Johansson, B., and Svenningsson, P.: 1995, ‘Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels,’ Energy 20, 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall, D. O., Rosillo-Calle, F., Williams, R. H., and Woods, J., 1993, ‘Biomass for energy: Supply prospects,’ in Johansson, T. B., Kelly, H., Reddy, A. K. N., and Williams, R. H. (eds.), Renewable Energy – Sources for Fuels and Electricity, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  27. Halloway, S.: 2001, ‘Storage of fossil fuel derived carbon dioxide beneath the surface of the earth,’ Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 26, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, L. D. D.: 2003, ‘Declining inter-temporal effectiveness of carbon sequestration: Implications for compliance with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,’ Manuscript. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  29. Ha-Duong, M. and Keith, D. W.: 2003, ‘Carbon storage: The economic efficiency of storing CO2 in leaky reservoirs,’ Clean Technol. Environ. Pol. 5, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herzog, H., Caldeira, K., and Reilly, J.: 2003, ‘An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of ocean carbon sequestration,’ Clim. Change 59, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IEA: 2002, ‘Transmission of CO2 and energy,’ Report no PH4/6. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Stoke Orchard, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC): 1994, Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emissions Scenarios, in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Bruce, J., Hoesung Lee, Callander, B. A., Haites, E., Harris, N., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC): 2001a, Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton et al. (eds.), University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Ishitani, H., Johansson, T. B.: 1996, ‘Energy supply mitigation options,’ in Watson, R. T., Zinoyowera, M. C., and Moss, R. H. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  35. Keith, D. W.: 2001, ‘Sinks, energy crops and land use: Coherent climate policy demands an integrated analysis of biomass,’ Clim. Change 49(1–2), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keith, D. W. and Rhodes, J. S.: 2002, ‘Bury, burn or both: A two-for-one deal on biomass carbon and energy – Reply,’ Clim Change 54(3), 375–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kheshgi, H. S., Prince, R. C., and Marland, G.: 2000, ‘The potential of biomass fuels in the context of global climate change: Focus on transportation fuels,’ Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 25, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kreutz, T. G.: 2002, Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, personal communication, May.Google Scholar
  39. Larson, E. and Kartha, S.: 2000, Biomass Energy Primer, UNDP, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Maier-Reimer, E. and Hasselman, K.: 1987, ‘Transport and storage of CO2 in the Ocean – An inorganic ocean-circulation carbon cycle model,’ Clim. Dyn. 2, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Möllersten, K. and Yan, J.: 2001, ‘Economic evaluation of biomass-based energy systems with CO2 capture and sequestration in kraft pulp mills – The influence of the price of CO2 emission quota,’ World Resour. Rev. 13(4), 509–525.Google Scholar
  42. Möllersten, K., Yan, J., and Moreira, J. R.: 2003, ‘Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage – Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions,’ Biomass Bioenergy 25, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakicenovic, N., Grubler, A., and McDonald, A.: 1998, Global Energy Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, NY.Google Scholar
  44. Nordhaus, W. D.: 2001, ‘Climate change – Global warming economics,’ Science 294, 1283–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Obersteiner, M., Azar, C., Kauppi, P., Möllersten, K., Moreira, J., Nilsson, S., Read, P., Riahi, K., Schlamadinger, B., Yamagata, Y., Yan, J., and van Ypersele, J. P.: 2001, ‘Managing climate risk,’ Science 294(5543), 786–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O'Neill, B. C. and Oppenheimer, M.: 2002, ‘Climate change – Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto protocol,’ Science 296(5575), 1971–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pacala, S. W.: 2002, ‘Global constraints on reservoir leakage,’ in Kaya, Y. Oyhama, K., Gale, J., Suzuki Y. (eds.), GHGT-6: Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, September 30–October 4, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  48. Parson, E. A. and Keith, D. W.: 1998, ‘Fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: Progress, prospects, and policy implications,’ Science 282, 1053–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Persson, T. and Azar, C.: 2003, ‘The cost of meeting the Kyoto protocol – Dealing with the carbon surplus in Russia and the Ukrain,’ Manage. Environ. Qual. 14, 488–507.Google Scholar
  50. Sandén, B. and Azar, C.: 2005, ‘Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets,’ Energy Policy 33, 1557–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schlamadinger, B., Grubb, M., Azar, C., Bauen, A., and Berndes, G.: 2001, ‘Carbon sinks and biomass energy production. A study of linkages, options and implications,’ Climate strategies network, London. Available at
  52. Sterner, T.: 2002, Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. Resources for the Future, RFF Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  53. Wahlund, B., Yan, J., and Westermark, M.: 2000, ‘Comparative assessment of biofuel-based combined heat and power generation plants in Sweden,’ Proceedings of 1st World Conference and Technology Exhibition Biomass for Energy and Industry, June 5–9, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  54. WEA: 2000, World Energy Assessment, United Nations Development Program & World Energy Council.Google Scholar
  55. Williams, R. H.: 1998, ‘Fuel decarbonization for fuel cell applications and sequestration of the separated CO2,’ in Ayres, R. (ed.), Eco-Restructuring: Implications for Sustainable Development, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 180–222.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, R. H.: 2001, ‘Toward Zero Emissions from Coal in China,’ Presented at US, China Clean Energy Forum, Beijing (31 Aug 2001).Google Scholar
  57. Williams, R. H.: 2000, ‘Advanced energy supply technologies,’ Chapter 8 in World Energy Assessment: Energy the Challenge of Sustainability, Bureau for Development Policy, United Nations Development Program, New York, pp. 274–329.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, R. H.: 2002, Toward Zero Emissions for Transportation Using Fossil Fuels. In Kurani, K. S. and Sperling, D. (eds.), VIII Biennial Asilomar Conference on Transportation, Energy, and Environmental Policy: Managing Transitions, Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  59. Wirsenius, S.: 2003, ‘The biomass metabolism of the food system: A model-based survey of the global and regional turnover of food biomass,’ Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(1), 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Victor, D. G. and Ausubel, J. H.: 2000, ‘Restoring the forests,’ Foreign Aff. 79, 127–144.Google Scholar
  61. Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R., and Edmonds, J. A.: 1996, ‘Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations,’ Nature 379(6562), 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Azar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristian Lindgren
    • 1
  • Eric Larson
    • 2
  • Kenneth Möllersten
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical Resource TheoryGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Princeton Environmental Inst.Princeton Univ.PrincetonU.S.A.
  3. 3.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations