Climatic Change

, Volume 69, Issue 2–3, pp 197–227 | Cite as

Weather Forecasts are for Wimps: Why Water Resource Managers Do Not Use Climate Forecasts

Article

Abstract

Short-term climate forecasting offers the promise of improved hydrologic management strategies. However, water resource managers in the United States have proven reluctant to incorporate them in decision making. While managers usually cite “poor reliability” of the forecasts as the reason for this, they are seldom able to demonstrate knowledge of the actual performance of forecasts or to consistently articulate the level of reliability that they would require. Analysis of three case studies in California, the Pacific Northwest, and metro Washington DC identifies institutional reasons that appear to lie behind managers’ reluctance to use the forecasts. These include traditional reliance on large built infrastructure, organizational conservatism and complexity, mismatch of temporal and spatial scales of forecasts to management needs, political disincentives to innovation, and regulatory constraints. The paper concludes that wider acceptance of the forecasts will depend on their being incorporated in existing organizational routines and industrial codes and practices, as well as changes in management incentives to innovation. Finer spatial resolution of forecasts and the regional integration of multi-agency functions would also enhance their usability.

Keywords

United States Actual Performance Water Resource Manager Weather Forecast Regional Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agar, M.: 1980, The Professional Stranger, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C.: 1976, ‘Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision-making’, Admin. Sci. Quart. 21, 363–375.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A.: 1978, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. H.: 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Averch, H. A.: 1987, ‘Applied social science, policy science and the federal government’, Knowledge 8, 521–544.Google Scholar
  6. Beyer, J. and Trice, H.: 1982, ‘The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings’, Admin. Sci. Quart. 27, 591–622.Google Scholar
  7. Callaghan, B., Miles, E. L., and Fluharty, D.: 1999, ‘Policy implications of climate forecasts for water resources management in the Pacific Northwest’, Pol. Sci. 32, 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caplan, N.: 1983, ‘Knowledge conversion and utilization’, in Holzner, B., Knorr, K. D. and Strasser, H. (eds.), Realizing Social Science Knowledge, Physica-Verlag, Vienna.Google Scholar
  9. Changnon, S. and Kunkel, K.: 1999, ‘Rapidly expanding uses of climate data and information in agriculture and water resources: Causes and characteristics of new applications’, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80(5), 821–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Changnon, S., Sonka, S., and Hofing, S.: 1988, ‘Assessing climate information use in agribusiness. Part I: Actual and potential use and impediments to usage’, J. Climate 1, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diaz, H. and Bordenave, J.: 1972, ‘New approaches to communication training for developing countries’, Third World Congress of Rural Sociology, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, M.: 1986, How Institutions Think, Syracruse University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Dunn, W. N.: 1983, ‘Measuring knowledge use’, Knowledge 5, 120–133.Google Scholar
  14. Featherstone, J. P.: 1996, ‘Water resources coordination and planning at the federal level: The need for integration’, Water Resources Update 104, 52–54.Google Scholar
  15. Frederick, K. and Kneese, A.: 1990, ‘Reallocation by markets and prices’, in Waggoner, P. (ed.), Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.: 1967, Grounded Discovery Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Walter DeGruyer.Google Scholar
  17. Gurvitch, G.: 1972, The Social Framework of Knowledge, Harper Row, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, D.: 2001, ‘BPA Spent $3.5 Billion for Wildlife: First Accounting Shows Most Used in Effort to Save Salmon, Steelhead’, Spokane Spokesman-Review, January 14, A1.Google Scholar
  19. Holzner, B. and Fisher, E.: 1979, ‘Knowledge in use’, Knowledge 1, 219–243.Google Scholar
  20. Houck, M. H.: 1992, ‘A systems approach to real-time reservoir operations’, in Topping, B. H. V. (ed.), Optimization and Artificial Intelligence in Civil and Structural Engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect.Google Scholar
  21. Houck, M. H. and Cohon, J. L.: 1978, ‘Sequential and explicitly stochastic linear programming models: A proposed method for design and management of multipurpose reservoir systems’, Water Resources Res. 14(2), 161–169.Google Scholar
  22. House, P. W. and Shull, R. D.: 1988, Rush to Policy, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. Ingram, H.: 1973, ‘The political economy of regional water institutions’, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 55(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
  24. Jaeger, C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., and Webler, T.: 1998, ‘Risk analysis and rational action’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 3, Battelle, Columbus.Google Scholar
  25. Janssen, T.: 1997, ‘Tolumin Argument Structures and Science Assessment’, George Mason University.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, J. C.: 1990, ‘Selecting ethnographic informants’, Qual. Res. Methods 22.Google Scholar
  27. Kuzel, A. J.: 1992, ‘Sampling in qualitative inquiry’, in Crabtree, B. F. and Miller, W. L. (eds.), Doing Qualitative Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Lach, D., Mosely, M., Quadrel, S., Rayner, S., Fischhoff, B., and Jones, S.: 1994, ‘Decision Makers’ Information Needs Elicitation’, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  29. Lach, D. and Quadrel, M.: 1995, ‘Decision Makers’ Information Needs Elicitation’, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, K.: 1993, Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, W. E.: 1984, Saving Water in a Desert City, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.: 1995, Designing Qualitative Research, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Miles, E. L., Snover, A. K., Hamlet, A. F., Callaghan, B., and Fluharty, D.: 2000, ‘Pacific Northwest regional assessment: The impacts of climate variability and climate change on the water resources association’, J. Am. Water Resources Assoc. 36(2), 399–420.Google Scholar
  34. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G.: 1960, Weather Information and Economic Decisions, RM-2670-NASA, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
  35. O’Riordan, T. and Rayner, S.: 1993, ‘Risk management for global environmental change’, Global Environ. Change 1(2), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pacanowsky, M.: 1995, ‘Team tools for wicked problems’, Org. Dyn. 23(3), 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer, R. N., Smith, J. A., Cohon, J. L. and ReVelle, C. S.: 1982, ‘Reservoir management in the Potomac River Basin’, J. Water Resources Plann. Manag. 1(1), 47–66.Google Scholar
  38. Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P.: 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  39. Robson, C.: 1993, Real World Research, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  40. Rogers, E. and Kincaid, D. L.: 1981, Communication Networks: Towards a New Paradigm for Research, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Sarachick, E. S. and Shea, E.: 1997, ‘End-to-end seasonal-to-interannual prediction’, The ENSO Signal 7, 4–6.Google Scholar
  42. Sheer, D. M., Beck, M. L., and Wright, J. R.: 1989, ‘The computer as negotiator’, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1, 68–73.Google Scholar
  43. Sheer, D. M., Ulrich, T. J., and Houck, M. H.: 1992, ‘Managing the lower Colorado River’, J. Water Resources Plann. Manag. 118.Google Scholar
  44. Simon, H.: 1957, Models of Man, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Sonka, S., Changnon, S., and Hofing, S.: 1998, ‘Assessing climate information use in agribusiness. Part II: Decision experiments to estimate economic value’, J. Climate 1, 766–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sonka, S., Hofing, S., and Changnon, S.: 1988, ‘Evaluating information as a strategic resources: An illustration for climate change’, Agribusiness 4(5), 475–491.Google Scholar
  47. Spradley, J. P.: 1979, The Ethnographic Interview, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Orlando FL.Google Scholar
  48. Starling, G.: 1979, The Politics and Economics of Public Policy, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  49. Weiss, C. H. and Bucuvalas, M. J.: 1980, ‘Truth tests and utility tests’, Am. Sociol. Rev. 45, 302–313.Google Scholar
  50. Whiteman, D.: 1985, ‘The fate of policy analysis in congressional decision-making’, Western Pol. Quart. 38, 294–311.Google Scholar
  51. Yazicigil, H., Houck, M. H. and Toebes, G. H.: 1983, ‘Daily operation of a complex reservoir system’, Water Resources Res. 19(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  52. Yeh, W.: 1985, ‘Reservoir management and operating models’, Water Resources Res. 21(12), 1797–1818.Google Scholar
  53. Yin, Y. K.: 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James Martin Institute of Science and Civilization, Saïd Business SchoolUniversity of OxfordU.K.
  2. 2.Oregon State UniversityCorvallisU.S.A.
  3. 3.School of Social EcologyUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations