Climatic Change

, Volume 69, Issue 2, pp 245–268

A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the River Thames, United Kingdom


DOI: 10.1007/s10584-005-1157-6

Cite this article as:
Diaz-Nieto, J. & Wilby, R.L. Climatic Change (2005) 69: 245. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-1157-6


Strategic-scale assessments of climate change impacts are often undertaken using the change factor (CF) methodology whereby future changes in climate projected by General Circulation Models (GCMs) are applied to a baseline climatology. Alternatively, statistical downscaling (SD) methods apply climate variables from GCMs to statistical transfer functions to estimate point-scale meteorological series. This paper explores the relative merits of the CF and SD methods using a case study of low flows in the River Thames under baseline (1961–1990) and climate change conditions (centred on the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s). Archived model outputs for the UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP02) scenarios are used to generate daily precipitation and potential evaporation (PE) for two climate change scenarios via the CF and SD methods. Both signal substantial reductions in summer precipitation accompanied by increased PE throughout the year, leading to reduced flows in the Thames in late summer and autumn. However, changes in flow associated with the SD scenarios are generally more conservative and complex than that arising from CFs. These departures are explained in terms of the different treatment of multidecadal natural variability, temporal structuring of daily climate variables and large-scale forcing of local precipitation and PE by the two downscaling methods.

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyKings CollegeLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Climate Change UnitEnvironment AgencyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations