Climatic Change

, Volume 69, Issue 2–3, pp 245–268

A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the River Thames, United Kingdom

Article

Abstract

Strategic-scale assessments of climate change impacts are often undertaken using the change factor (CF) methodology whereby future changes in climate projected by General Circulation Models (GCMs) are applied to a baseline climatology. Alternatively, statistical downscaling (SD) methods apply climate variables from GCMs to statistical transfer functions to estimate point-scale meteorological series. This paper explores the relative merits of the CF and SD methods using a case study of low flows in the River Thames under baseline (1961–1990) and climate change conditions (centred on the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s). Archived model outputs for the UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP02) scenarios are used to generate daily precipitation and potential evaporation (PE) for two climate change scenarios via the CF and SD methods. Both signal substantial reductions in summer precipitation accompanied by increased PE throughout the year, leading to reduced flows in the Thames in late summer and autumn. However, changes in flow associated with the SD scenarios are generally more conservative and complex than that arising from CFs. These departures are explained in terms of the different treatment of multidecadal natural variability, temporal structuring of daily climate variables and large-scale forcing of local precipitation and PE by the two downscaling methods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnell, N. W.: 1998, ‘Effects of Climate Change on River Flows: Update Using the UKCIP98 Scenarios’, Report to the UK Environment Agency, University of Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Arnell, N. W.: 2003a, ‘Effects of Climate Change on River Flows and Groundwater Recharge Using the UKCIP02 Scenarios’, Report to UK Water Industry Research Limited, University of Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Arnell, N. W: 2003b, ‘Relative effects of multi-decadal climatic variability and changes in the mean and variability of climate due to global warming: Future streamflows in Britain’, J. Hydrol. 270, 19–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnell, N. W and Reynard, N. S.: 1996, ‘The effects of climate change due to global warming on river flows in Great Britain’, J. Hydrol. 183, 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, W. A. R: 2002, ‘Local versus remote grid points in climate downscaling’, Clim. Res. 21, 27–42.Google Scholar
  6. Bronstert, A., Niehoff, D. and Burger, G: 2002, ‘Effects of climate and land-use change on strom runoff generation: Present knowledge and modelling capabilities’, Hydrol Processes 16, 509– 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles, S. P., Bates, B. C. and Hughes, J. P: 1999a, ‘A spatio-temporal model for downscaling precipitation occurrence and amounts. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 31657–31669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charles, S. P., Bates, B. C., Whetton, P. H. and Hughes, J. P.: 1999b, Validation of downscaling models for changed climate conditions: Case study of southwestern Australia. Clim. Res. 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
  9. Crane, R. G., Yarnal, B., Barron, E. J. and Hewitson, B.: 2002, Scale interactions and regional climate: Examples from the Susquehama river basin. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 8, 147–158.Google Scholar
  10. Crooks, S., Davis, H. and Goodsell, G: 2000, ‘Rainfall-funoff modeling and the impact of land use change in the Thames catchment’, PIK Rep. 1, 111–126.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, R. J.: 2000, An Investigation into Hydrological Variability and Change in the Thames Region, Environment Agency, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, R. J.: 2001, The Effects of Climate Change on River Flows in the Thames Region, Water Resources Hydrology and Hydrometry Report 00/04, Environment Agency, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Environment Agency: 2001a, Water Resources for the Future: A Strategy for England and Wales, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Frei, C., Christensen, J.H., Déqué, M., Jacob, D., Jones, R.G. and Vidale, P.L. 2002, Daily precipitation statistics in regional climate models: Evaluation and intercomparison for the European Alps. J. Geophy. Res. 108, 4124–4142.Google Scholar
  15. Frei, C. and Schär, C.: 2001, ‘Detection probability of trends in rare events: Theory and application to heavy precipitation in the Alpine region’, J. Clim. 14, 1568–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Environment Agency: 2001b, State of the Environment Report for Thames Region, Environment Agency, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Hay, L., Wilby, R. L. and Leavesley, G. H.: 2000, ‘A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States’, J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 362, 387–397.Google Scholar
  18. Hewitson, B. C. and Crane, R. G.: 1996, ‘Climate downscaling: Techniques and application’, Clim. Res. 7, 85–95.Google Scholar
  19. Hisdal, H., Stahl, K., Tallaksen, L.M. and Demuth, S.: 2001, ‘Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent?’, Int. J. Climatol. 21, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hudson, J. A. and Gilman, K.: 1993, ‘Long term variability in the water balances of the Plynlimon catchments’, J. Hydrol. 143, 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hulme, M., Barrow, E. M., Arnell, N. W., Harrison, P. A., Johns, T. C. and Downing, T. E.: 1999, ‘Relative impacts of human-induced climate change and natural climate variability’, Nature 397, 688–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hulme, M., Jenkins, G. J., Lu, X., Turnpenny, J. R., Mitchell, T. D., Jones, R. G., Lowe, J., Murphy, J. M., Hassell, D., Boorman, P., McDonald, R. and Hill, S.: 2002, Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R. and Joseph, D.: 1996, ‘The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project’, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leavesley, G. H.: 1994, ‘Modelling the effects of climate change on water resources – a review’, Clim. Change 28, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Legates, D. R. and McCabe, G. J.: 1999, ‘Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation’, Water Resour Res. 35, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lockwood, J. G.: 1999, ‘Is potential evapotranspiration and its relationship with actual evapotranspiration sensitive to elevated atmospheric CO2 levels?’, Clim. Change 41, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. London Climate Change Partnership (LCCP): 2002, ‘A Climate Change Impacts in London Evaluation Study’, Final Technical Report, Entec UK, London.Google Scholar
  29. Maak, K. and von Storch, H.: 1997, ‘Statistical downscaling of monthly mean temperature to the beginning of flowering of Galanthus nivalis L. in northern Germany’, Int. J. Biometeorol. 41, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marsh, T. J.: 2001, ‘Climate change and hydrological stability: A look at long-term trends in south-eastern Britain’, Weather 56, 319–328.Google Scholar
  31. Marsh, T. and Monkhouse, R.: 1990, ‘Hydrological aspects of the developments and rapid decay of the 1989 drought’, Weather 45, 290–299.Google Scholar
  32. Marsh, T. J. and Monkhouse, R. A.: 1996, ‘A year of hydrological extremes – 1990’, Weather 46, 365–376.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, T. J. and Turton, P. S.: 1996, ‘The 1995 drought – a water resource perspective’, Weather 51, 46–53.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, M., Robert, E. D. and Zong-Lang, Y.: 1999, ‘Use of land surface coupled general circulation model to examine the impacts of doubled stomatal resistance on the water resources of the American Southwest’, J. Clim. 12, 3359–3375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mimikou, M. A., Baltas, E., Varanou, E. and Pantazis, K.: 2000, ‘Regional impacts of climate change on water resources quantity and quality indicators’, J. Hydrol. 234, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pilling, C. and Jones, J. A. A.: 1999, ‘High resolution climate change scenarios: Implications for British runoff’, Hydrol Processes 13, 2877–2895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sefton, C. E. M. and Boorman, D. B.: 1997, ‘A regional investigation into climate change impacts on UK streamflows’, J. Hydrol. 195, 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weichert, A. and Bürger, G.: 1998, ‘Linear versus nonlinear techniques in downscaling’, Clim. Res. 10, 83–93.Google Scholar
  39. Wilby, R. L.: 2003, ‘Past and projected trends in London’s urban heat island’, Weather 58, 251–260.Google Scholar
  40. Wilby, R. L. and Wigley, T. M. L.: 1997, ‘Downscaling general circulation model output: A review of methods and limitations’, Prog. Phys. Geogr. 214, 530–548.Google Scholar
  41. Wilby, R. L. and Wigley, T. M. L.: 2000, ‘Precipitation predictors for downscaling circulation model relationships’, Int. J. Climatol. 20, 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilby, R. L., Dawson, C. W. and Barrow, E. M.: 2001, ‘SDSM – A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts’, Environ. Modell. Software 17, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilby, R., Greenfield, B. and Glenny, C.: 1994, ‘A coupled synoptic–hydrological model for climate change impact assessment’, J. Hydrol. 153, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilby, R.L., Tomlinson, O.J. and Dawson, C.W.: 2003, ‘Multi-site simulation of precipitation by conditional resampling’, Clim. Res. 23, 183–194.Google Scholar
  45. Wilby, R. L., Wigley, T. M. L., Conway, D., Jones, P. D., Hewitson, B. C., Main, J. and Wilks, D. S.: 1998, ‘Statistical downscaling of General Circulation Model output: A comparison of methods’, Water Resources Res. 34, 2995–3008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zorita, E. and Von Storch, H.: 1999, ‘The analog method as a simple statistical downscaling technique: Comparison with more complicated methods’, J. Clim. 12, 2474–2489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyKings CollegeLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Climate Change UnitEnvironment AgencyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations