Climatic Change

, Volume 67, Issue 2–3, pp 257–272 | Cite as

Carbon Stores, Sinks, and Sources in Forests of Northwestern Russia: Can We Reconcile Forest Inventories with Remote Sensing Results?

  • Olga N. Krankina
  • Mark E. Harmon
  • Warren B. Cohen
  • Doug R. Oetter
  • Zyrina Olga
  • Maureen V. Duane


Forest inventories and remote sensing are the two principal data sources used to estimate carbon (C) stocks and fluxes for large forest regions. National governments have historically relied on forest inventories for assessments but developments in remote sensing technology provide additional opportunities for operational C monitoring. The estimate of total C stock in live forest biomass modeled from Landsat imagery for the St. Petersburg region was consistent with estimates derived from forest inventory data for the early 1990s (272 and 269 TgC, respectively). The estimates of mean C sink in live forest biomass also agreed well (0.36 and 0.34 Mg C ha−1 yr−1). Virtually all forest lands were accumulating C in live biomass, however when the net change in total ecosystem C stock was considered, 19% of the forest area were a net source of C. The average net C sink in total ecosystem biomass is quite weak (0.08 MgC ha−1 yr−1 and could be reversed by minor increases in harvest rates or a small decline in biomass growth rates.


Biomass Remote Sensing Landsat Carbon Store Forest Inventory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexeyev, V. A. and Birdsey, R. A.: 1998, ‘Carbon storage in forests and peatlands of Russia’, General Technical Report, NE-244, USDA FS, p. 137.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, W. B., Maiersperger, T. K., Spies, T. A. and Oetter, D. R.: 2001, ‘Modeling forest cover attributes as continuous variables in a regional context with Thematic Mapper data’, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 22, 2279–2310.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, W. B., Spies, T. A. and Fiorella, M.: 1995, ‘Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multiownership landscape of western Oregon, USA’, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 16, 721–746.Google Scholar
  4. Drozhalov, M. M.: 1990, Forest Fund of the USSR: Statistical Summary (Updated January 1, 1988), VNITsLesresurs Publishers, Moscow, p. 1005 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  5. Filimonov, B. K., Kukuev, Y. A., Strakhov, V. V., Filipchuk, A. N., Dyakun, F. A., Sdobnova, V. V. and Danilova, S. V.: 1995, Forest Fund of Russia: Statistical Summary (Updated January 1, 1993). VNITsLesresurs Publishers, Moscow, p. 280 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Goodale, C. L., Apps, M. J., Birdsey, R. A., Field, C. B., Heath, L. S., Houghton, R. A., Jenkins, J. C., Kohlmaier, G. H., Kurz, W., Liu, S., Nabuurs, G., Nilsson, S. and Shvidenko, A. Z.: 2002, ‘Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere’, Ecol. Appl. 12, 891–899.Google Scholar
  7. Griaznov, S. E., Kerkvliet, J., Panchenko, V. and Zyrina, O. A.: submitted, ‘Forest Management, Economics, and Carbon Storage in Northwest Russia’, in Harmon, M. E. and Krankina, O. N., (eds.), Ecological Studies. Carbon Dynamics of Two Forest Ecosystems: Northwestern Russia and the Pacific Northwest, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  8. Harmon, M. E. and Domingo, J. B. 2001, A Users Guide to STANDCARB version 2.0: A Model to Simulate the Carbon Stores in Forest Stands (http://www.fsl.orst/lter/pubs/models/Standcarb2. htm).
  9. Harmon, M. E. and Marks, B.: 2002, ‘Effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon stores in forest stands’, Can. J. For. Res. 32, 863–877.Google Scholar
  10. Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Inkinen, M., Engdahl, M., Linko, S. and Zhu, Y. H.: 2000, ‘Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes’, Forest Ecol. Manage. 128, 109–120.Google Scholar
  11. Krankina, O. N., Bergen, K. M., Sun, G., Masek, J. G., Shugart, H. H., Kharuk, V., Kasischke, E., Cohen, W. B., Oetter, D. R. and Duane, M. V.: (2004), ‘Northern Eurasia: Remote Sensing of Boreal Forest in Selected Regions’, in Gutman, G. et al. (eds.), Land Change Science: Observing, Monitoring, and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth’s Surface, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Krankina, O. N., Fiorella, M., Cohen, W. B. and Treyfeld, R. F.: 1998, ‘The use of Russian forest inventory data for carbon budgeting and for developing carbon offset strategies’, World Res. Rev. 10(1), 52–66.Google Scholar
  13. Kukuev, Y. A., Krankina, O. N. and Harmon, M. E.: 1997, ‘The Forest Inventory System in Russia’, J. Forestry 95(9), 15–20.Google Scholar
  14. Moshkalev, A. G., Davidov, G. M., Yanovskij, L. N., Moiseyev, B. S., Stolyarov, D. P. and Burnevskij Y. I.: 1984, Forest Mensuration Reference Book, Forest Academy Publishers, Leningrad, p. 310 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  15. Myneni, R. B., Dong, J., Tucker, C. J., Kaufmann, R. K., Kauppi, P. E., Liski, J., Zhou, L., Alexeyev, V. and Hughes, M. K.: 2001, ‘A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98(26), 14784–14789.Google Scholar
  16. Oetter, D. R., Cohen, W. B., Krankina, O. N. and Maiersperger, T. K.: Submitted, Land Cover Mapping for Carbon Studies in the St. Petersburg Region of Northwest Russia and comparisons with Western Oregon, in Harmon, M. E. Krankiana, O. N. (eds.), Ecological Studies, Carbon dynamics of two forest ecosystems: Northwestern Russia and the Pacific Northwest, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  17. Running, S. W., Thornton, P. E., Nemani, R. and Glassy, J. M.: 2000, ‘Global terrestrial gross and net primary productivity from the earth observing system’, in Sala, O. Jackson, R. and Mooney H. (eds.), Methods in Ecosystem Science, Springer-Verlag New York, pp. 44–57.Google Scholar
  18. Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., Canadell, J., Churkina, G., Cramer, W., Denning, A. S., Field, C. B., Friedlingstein, P., Goodale, C., Heimann, M., Houghton, R. A., Melillo, J. M., Moore, B. III, Murdiyarso, D., Noble, I., Pacala, S. W., Prentice, I. C., Raupach, M. R., Rayner, P. J., Scholes, R. J., Steffen, W. L. and Wirth, C.: 2001, ‘Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems’, Nature 414, 169–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Strakhov, V. V., Dyakun, F. A., Sdobnova, V. V., Danilova, N. K., Kurdina, G. V., Belyakova, T. F. and Polyakova, G. P.: 1999, Forest Fund of Russia: Statistical Summary (Updated January 1, 1998), VNITsLesresurs Publishers, Moscow (in Russian), p. 505.Google Scholar
  20. Treyfeld, R. F., Kobak, K. I. and Griazkin, A. V.: Submitted ‘Dynamics of Carbon Stocks in the Live Biomass of Forests in the St. Petersburg Region’, in Harmon, M. E and Krankina, O. N. (eds.), Ecological Studies. Carbon Dynamics of Two Forest Ecosystems: Northwestern Russia and the Pacific Northwest, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, (UNECE) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Timber Section: 2000, Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand (Geneva Timber and Forest Study Papers, No. 17). United Nations, New York. (

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga N. Krankina
    • 1
  • Mark E. Harmon
    • 1
  • Warren B. Cohen
    • 2
  • Doug R. Oetter
    • 3
  • Zyrina Olga
    • 4
  • Maureen V. Duane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisU.S.A.
  2. 2.USDA Forest ServicePNW Research StationCorvallisU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of History and GeographyGeorgia College & State UniversityMilledgevilleU.S.A.
  4. 4.European Forest InstituteJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations