Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 485–498 | Cite as

“Unless Someone Like You” Buys a Ticket to this Movie: Dual Audience and Aetonormativity in Picturebook to Film Adaptations

  • Meghann Meeusen
Original Paper

Abstract

As critical study of adapted texts moves away from a focus on fidelity to explore questions of adaptive practice, picturebook to film adaptation offers unique opportunities to redirect discourse related to the value of adaptive changes. Because feature-length films made from children’s picturebooks require filmmakers to add substantial content, they open discussion of how adaptive changes engage key ideas related to children’s literature more broadly, including dual audience, didacticism, and aetonormativity. This essay explores how these concepts transform in picturebook to movie adaptation, drawing on two family films made from iconic picturebook source texts—Dr. Seuss’s The Lorax (1971) and Chris Van Allsburg’s Jumanji (1981)—to posit that added content foregrounds adult presence within the story and participation in viewership far more than in the films’ picturebook counterparts, positioning adults as learners while at the same time reinforcing adult/child hierarchies.

Keywords

Adaptation Children’s film Picturebooks Dual audience Didacticism Aetonormativity 

References

  1. Buchbinder, David. (2011). From ‘Wizard’ to ‘Wicked’: Adaptation Theory and Young Adult Fiction. In Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford (Eds.), Contemporary Children’s Literature and Film: Engaging with Theory (pp. 127–146). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Capshaw Smith, Katharine. (2013). Middle Age. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 38(2), 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaston, Joel D. (1997). The ‘Ozification’ of American Children’s Fantasy Films: The Blue Bird, Alice in Wonderland, and Jumanji. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 22(1), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gubar, Marah. (2013). Risky Business: Talking about Children in Children’s Literature Criticism. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 38(4), 450–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutcheon, Linda. (2008). Harry Potter and the Novice’s Confession. The Lion and the Unicorn, 32(2), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutcheon, Linda. (2006). A Theory of Adaptation New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, Joe (Director). (1995). Jumanji Culver City, CA: TriStar Pictures.Google Scholar
  8. Klein, Jeanne. (2005). From Children’s Perspectives: A Model of Aesthetic Processing in Theatre. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mackey, Margaret. (1998). The Case of Peter Rabbit: Changing Conditions of Literature for Children New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  10. Mackey, Margaret. (2002). Literacies Across Media: Playing the Text New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Nel, Philip. (2004). Dr. Seuss: American Icon. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Nel, Philip. “I am the Lorax. I speak for the Thneeds?.” Nine Kinds of Pie, http://www.philnel.com/2012/03/03/loraxfilm/. 16 May 2017.
  13. Nikolajeva, Maria. (2010). Power, Voice and Subjectivity In Literature For Young Readers New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Nodelman, Perry. (2008). The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.Google Scholar
  15. Renaud, Chris (Director). (2012). The Lorax. Universal City, CA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  16. Rose, Jacqueline. (1992). The Case of Peter Pan, or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanders, Joseph Sutliff. (2013). Chaperoning Words: Meaning-Making in Comics and Picture Books. Children’s Literature, 41, 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Seiter, Ellen. (1999). Television and New Media Audiences Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  19. Seuss, Dr. (1971). The Lorax New York: Random.Google Scholar
  20. Van Allsburg, Chris. (1981). Jumanji. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  21. Wojcik-Andrews, Ian. (2000). Children’s Films: History, Ideology, Pedagogy, Theory New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations