Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 341–354 | Cite as

“A Pleasant Way of Teaching the Little Ones to Recognise Flowers”: Instructional Nature Plays in Early 20th Century Britain

  • Amy Palmer
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

This article analyses plays written for child performers in the early twentieth century. The plays chosen are classified as “instructional” and aimed at developing pupils’ knowledge of the curriculum. The focus is on understanding why these plays were useful for Froebelian educators in the period. Friedrich Froebel (1782–1852) was a German pedagogue, who is most widely known for establishing the kindergarten movement and for promoting child-centred learning. The use of instructional drama was appealing to many of his followers, as it chimed with their understanding of the need for experiential approaches to education. Nature study was particularly important to Froebel, and therefore this article evaluates instructional plays about the natural world, offering a close examination of five examples. They contain active, holistic and multi-sensory learning experiences which would have appealed to Froebelian teachers. They all use elements of anthropomorphism and some also use fairies to engage children with the subject matter. Such devices could be problematic in texts that were written for the purpose of teaching scientific realities and the representation of a human sensibility trapped in plant or animal form could sometimes result in emotionally distressing situations. However, the medium of drama gave children the power to make their own meaning from the material presented, perhaps through re-interpreting the plot with unscripted actions or through lightening the mood with a touch of humour. This was an advantage which the plays had over other forms of literature. These works merit increased respect as educational tools that supported innovative learning.

Keywords

Plays for child performers Drama education Nature studies Froebelian educators Instructional drama 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adkins, Ella. (1935). The Choice of Plays for Young Children. Child Life, New Series, 12, 189–190.Google Scholar
  2. Blount, Margaret. (1974). Animal Land. London: Hutchinson and Co.Google Scholar
  3. Bolton, Gavin. (1998). Acting in Classroom Drama: A Critical Analysis. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.Google Scholar
  4. Boughton, Magaret. (1911b). Introduction. In Margaret Boughton, Easy Games for Little Players: A Collection of Dramatized Nursery Rhymes (pp. vi–viii). London: Charles and Dible.Google Scholar
  5. Board of Education. (1937). Handbook of Suggestions for Teachers. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Chalke, R.D. (1912). A Synthesis of Froebel and Herbart. London: W.B.Clive University Tutorial Press.Google Scholar
  7. Child Life. (1892). Review: Nursery Comedies: Twelve Tiny Plays for Children. Mrs Hugh Bell. II(3), 48.Google Scholar
  8. Child Life. (1911). Review: Easy Games for Little Players: A Collection of Dramatized Nursery Rhymes. Margaret Boughton. XIII(68), 254.Google Scholar
  9. Child Life. (1926). Review: Three Mother Story Plays. Evelyn Townend. XXV111(136), 28.Google Scholar
  10. Child Life. (1928). Books for School Plays (Section in Reviews and Notices). 145, 140–142.Google Scholar
  11. Child Life. (1935a). Review: Jill’s Magic Island and Other Stories. Ernest A. Jelf. New Series, 5, 59.Google Scholar
  12. Child Life. (1935b). Review: Macmillan’s Novel Series of School Plays for Infants. Kate Lay. New Series, 10, 155.Google Scholar
  13. Child Life. (1938). Review: Ring up the Curtain (Books I, II, III). D.G.Gardner, Child Life IV(3), 45.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, Henry Caldwell. (1917). The Play Way: An Essay in Educational Methods. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Cosslett, Tess. (2006). Talking Animals in British Children’s Fiction. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Darvell, Maude L. and Tuffley, Grace M. (1925b). Preface. In Maude L. Darvell, and Grace M. Tuffley, Plays in Rhyme for Little Ones (p. 4). London: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar
  17. Densham, D. (1918–1919). Student Work. FA/9.5. Froebel Archive for Childhood Studies. University of Roehampton. London.Google Scholar
  18. Dodd, C.I. (1911). Nature Studies and Fairy Tales: Part One. London: Thomas Nelson and Son.Google Scholar
  19. English, Douglas. (1910). A Book of Talking Beasts: Bunny Rabbit, Squirrel, Toad and “Those Sort of People”. London:Eveleigh Nash.Google Scholar
  20. Finlay-Johnson, Harriet. (1912). The Dramatic Method of Teaching. London: James Nisbet.Google Scholar
  21. Froebel, Friedrich. (1844). Mutter- und Kose-Lieder: Dichtung und Bilder zur Pflege des Kindheitlebens. Blankenburg bei Rudolstadt: Die Anstalt zur Pflege des Beschäftigungstriebes der Kindheit und Jugend.Google Scholar
  22. Froebel, Friedrich. (1887). The Education of Man. (W.N.Hailmann, Trans.). London: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  23. Froebel, Friedrich. (1888). Autobiography of Friedrich Froebel (2nd ed.) (Emilie Michaelis and H. Keatley Moore, Trans.). London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory Kohlstedt, S. (2010). Teaching Children Science: Hands-On Nature Study in North America, 1890–1930 Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haworth, Freda M. (1936). The Teaching of Nature Study in Infant and Junior Schools. Child Life, New Series II, 6, 82–85.Google Scholar
  26. Hines, Maude. (2004). “He Made Us Very Much Like the Flowers”: Human/Nature in Nineteenth Century Anglo-American Children’s Literature. In Sidney I. Dobrin and Kenneth B. Kidd (Eds.), Wild Things: Children’s Culture and Ecocriticism (pp. 16–30). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hoare, Thomas W. (1907). The “Look-about-you” Nature Study Books: Number One. London and Edinburgh: T.C. and E.C.Jack.Google Scholar
  28. Hornbrook, David. (1998). Education and the Dramatic Art (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Howlett, John. (2013). Progressive Education: A Critical Introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  30. Isaacs, Susan. (1930). Intellectual Growth in Young Children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Jelf, Ernest Arthur. (1931). Writing Plays for Children. Child Life, XXXIV(153), 14–17.Google Scholar
  32. Keene, Melanie. (2015). Science in Wonderland: The Scientific Fairy Tales of Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kready, Laura F. (1916). A Study of Fairy Tales. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  34. Liebschner, Joachim. (1992). A Child’s Work: Freedom and Guidance in Froebel’s Educational Theory and Practice. Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lutts, Ralph H. (2001). The Nature Fakers: Wildlife, Science and Sentiment. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  36. Nikolajeva, Maria. (2005). Aesthetic Approaches to Children’s Literature: An Introduction. Oxford: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  37. Plaisted, Laura L. (1910). The Early Education of Children. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Selleck, R.J.W. (1972). English Primary Education and the Progressives 1914–1918. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  39. Slight, J.P. (1952). Froebel and the English Primary School of Today. In Evelyn Lawrence (Ed.), Friedrich Froebel and English Education (95–124). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Vallance, Rosalind. (1935). Psychological Values in Dramatic Work for Young Children. Child Life, New Series, I(12), 181–182.Google Scholar
  41. Woodham-Smith, P. (1952). History of the Froebel Movement in England.  In Evelyn Lawrence (Ed.), Friedrich Froebel and English Education (pp. 34–94). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Children’s plays

  1. Belton, Bee and Howell, Hamilton. (1932). Sixes and Sevens: A Game to Play in the Number Lesson. In P.B.Ballard (Ed.), Plays for Acting in the Infant School (pp. 41–43). London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  2. Boughton, Margaret. (1911a). Little Ida's Flowers. In Margaret Boughton, Easy Games for Little Players: A Collection of Dramatized Nursery Rhymes (pp. 13–14). London: Charles and Dible.Google Scholar
  3. Boughton, Margaret. (1911c). The Birds of Killingworth. In Margaret Boughton, Easy Games for Little Players: A Collection of Dramatized Nursery Rhymes (p. 33). London: Charles and Dible.Google Scholar
  4. Buchheim, E.S. (1905). Short German Plays: Second Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, Eleanor I. (1915). Phonic Plays for Infants and Juniors: A Guide to the Systematic Teaching of English. London: Blackie and Son.Google Scholar
  6. Compton, Viola and Anderton, Jean. (1917). History by the Dramatic Method: Historical Plays for Children: Teachers’ Book One. London: James Nisbet.Google Scholar
  7. Darvell, Maude L. and Tuffley, Grace M. (1925a). How the Trees Lost their Leaves. In Plays in Rhyme for Little Ones (pp. 48–53). London: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar
  8. Greenfield, M. (1928). The Naughty Crows. In Editor Unknown, The Third Book of School Plays: Plays for the Younger Ones (p. 14). London: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar
  9. Jelf, E.A. (1934). The Blue Tit’s Nest. In Jill’s Magic Island and Other Stories (pp. 145–167). London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Lay, Kate. (1935). The Vegetable Garden. London: McMillan.Google Scholar
  11. Ross, Patience Adrian. (1928). Rock Cakes.  In The Third book of School Plays: Plays for the Younger Ones (pp. 17–18). London: Evans brothers. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Froebel CollegeUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options