Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 152–168 | Cite as

“But The Soldier’s Remains Were Gone”: Thought Experiments in Children’s Literature

  • Lisa Sainsbury
Original Paper

Abstract

In this article thought experiments are uncovered as key stimuli of philosophical potential in children’s literature and their presentation and function is examined in a selection of focal texts, including: Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865) and Through the Looking-Glass (1871); Even the Parrot by Dorothy Sayers (1944); Nina Bawden’s Carrie’s War (1974); and A Game of Soldiers (1985) by Jan Needle. The thought experiment is a device common to science and philosophy and has been recognised as an heuristic tool in literature generally, but here children’s literature is drawn into the conversation, revealing that—as a dynamic mechanism of children’s narrative—thought experiments have a long-standing and particular role to play in books for young people. This paper connects with a recent turn in children’s literature discourse toward the conditions of power in books for young readers; it moves on the debate by demonstrating that the apparatus of thought experimentation places the implied child reader in a position of philosophical responsibility and forward thinking. Presenting thought experiments in different ways, formal properties of the thought experiment—such as conversational mode, double engagement and modal positioning—are identified and shown to open up a philosophical space of subsequence in children’s texts.

Keywords

Thought experiment Philosophy Ethics Implied reader Wonder Lewis Carroll Dorothy Sayers Nina Bawden Jan Needle 

References

  1. Barthes, Roland. (1974). S/Z: An Essay (trans. Richard Miller). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Bawden, Nina. (1974). Carrie’s War. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Beauvais, Clémentine. (2015). The Mighty Child: Time and Power in Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner, Jerome. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, Jerome. (2004). Life as Narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–710.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, Lewis. (2009a/1865). “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.” In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–111.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, Lewis. (2009b/1871). “Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There.” In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 112–255.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, Lewis. (1999/1907). Feeding the Mind. Florida: Levenger Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coates, Jen. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  10. Davenport, Edward A. (1983). Literature as Thought Experiment (On Aiding and Abetting the Muse). Philosophy of the Social Sciences Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 13, 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, David. (2007). Aesthetics and Literature. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Gamble, Nikki. (2013). Exploring Children’s Literature: Reading with Pleasure and Purpose, 3rd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Gough, Noel. (2008). Narrative Experiments and Imaginative Inquiry. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 335–349.Google Scholar
  14. Hardinge, Frances. (2014). Cuckoo Song. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, John. (2007/1975). The Survival Lottery. In Russ Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Ethical Theory: An Anthology (pp. 513-17). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Iser, Wolfgang. (1974). The Implied Reader. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mach, Ernst. (1898/1895). Popular Scientific Lectures, 3rd ed. (trans. Thomas J. McCormack). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Myers, Mitzi. (1989). Socializing Rosamund: Educational Ideology and Fictional Form. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 14(2), 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Needle, Jan. (1985). A Game of Soldiers. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  20. Ness, Patrick. (2011). A Monster Calls. London: Walker Books.Google Scholar
  21. Nikolajeva, Maria. (2010). Power, Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Nikolajeva, Maria. (2014). Reading for Learning: Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nodelman, Perry. (2008). The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Onions, Charles T. (Ed.). (1966). The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Plato. (1960/c.360 BC). Theaetetus (trans. Francis MacDonald Cornford). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, Bertrand. (2010/1926). On Education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Sainsbury, Lisa. (2013). Ethics in British Children's Literature: Unexamined Life. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  28. Sayers, Dorothy L. (1944). Even the Parrot: Exemplary Conversations for Enlightened Children. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  29. Shafer-Landau, Russ (Ed.). (2007). Ethical Theory: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Stokes, Ashley. (2001). Plotting a Novel. In Julia Bell and Paul Magrs (Eds.), The Creative Writing Coursebook. (pp. 207–213). London: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Swirski, Peter. (2007). Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution and Game Theory. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1968/1953). Philosophical Investigations (trans. G.E.M. Anscombe). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English and Creative Writing, Digby Stuart CollegeUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations