The “Mother” of All Schemas: Creating Cognitive Dissonance in Children’s Fantasy Literature Using the Mother Figure
- 1.5k Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Mothers are essential facilitators of early Theory of Mind development and intrinsic to the acquisition, as well as the content, of many basic schemas learnt in infancy. In this article it is argued that the mother schema in children’s literature can ease a child’s transition into literary discourse by exploiting the child’s secure base schema. Furthermore, by generating a sense of felt security in the reading event, the benevolent mother becomes an inherent part of the child’s broader reading schema. Two texts are examined in this article in which the good mother’s familiarity is undermined through the introduction of elements traditionally associated with the bad mother figure. Using Neil Gaiman’s Coraline and V.C. Andrews’ Flowers in the Attic, it is argued that the modification of the mother schema can serve as a way to introduce the reader to new genres and themes; however, significant dissonance is generated in the child’s reading schema in instances where the good/bad mother dichotomy is not restored by the end of the narrative.
Keywords
Schema Children’s Literature Fantasy Dissonance Scripts Good Mother Bad Mother Secure base schemaReferences
- Aldama, Frederick Luis and Hogan, Patrick Colm. (2014). Literature, Language, and Aesthetics: Conversations on Cognitive Cultural Studies Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
- Andrews, V.C. (1979). Flowers in the Attic New York: Gallery Books.Google Scholar
- Applebee, Arthur N. (1978). The Child’s Concept of Story: Ages 2-17 Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bettelhiem, Bruno. (1976). The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales New York: Vintage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bowlby, John. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Separation: Anxiety and Anger New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, John. (1988). A Secure Base New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brandt, Diana. (1993). Wild Mother Dancing: Maternal Narrative in Canadian Literature Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
- Cadden, Mike. (2012). All is well: The Epilogue in children’s fantasy fiction. Narrative, 20(3), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cliff-Hodges, Gabrielle. (2010). Reasons for reading. Literacy UKLA, 44(2), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coats, Karen. (2008). Between Horror, Humour, and Hope: Neil Gaiman and the Psychic Work of the Gothic. In Anna Jackson, Karen Coats and Roderick McGillis (Eds.), The Gothic in Children’s Literature (pp. 77–92). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Festinger, Leon. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Stanford: University of Stanford Press.Google Scholar
- Francus, Marilyn. (2012). Monstrous Motherhood: Eighteenth Century Culture and the Ideology of Domesticity Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Gaiman, Neil. (2009). Coraline. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Genette, Gerard. (1988). Narrative Discourse Revisited. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Gilead, Sarah. (1991). Magic abjured: Closure in children’s fantasy literature. PMLA, 106(2), 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gordon, Cynthia. (2002). ‘I’m Mommy and you’re Natalie’: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother-child discourse. Language and Society, 31(5), 679–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gose, Elliot. (1998). Mere Creatures: A Study of Modern Fantasy Tales for Children Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Herman, David. (2002). Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative Omaha: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Hogan, Patrick Colm. (2009). The Mind and its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hourihan, Margery. (1997). Deconstructing the Hero: Literary Theory and Children’s Literature London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Iser, Wolfgang. (1972). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. New Literary History, 3(2), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iser, Wolfgang. (1980). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, Anna, Coats, Karen and McGillis, Roderick (Eds.). (2008). The Gothic in Children’s Literature: Haunting the Borders New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ladd-Taylor, Molly and Umansky, Lauri (Eds.). (1998a). “Bad” Mothers: The Politics of Blame in Twentieth-century America New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamb, Michael E. (2010). The Role of the Father in Child Development, 5th ed Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Miall, David S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mikulincer, Mario, Hirschberger, Gilad, Nachmias, Orit and Gillath, Omri. (2001). The affective component of the secure-base schema: Affective priming with representation of attachment security. journal of personality and social psychology, 81(2), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mikulincer, Mario and Shaver, Philip R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative readings to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, Lynne, Hipwell, Alison, Hooper, Richard, Stein, Alan and Cooper, Peter. (1996). The cognitive development of 5-year-old children of postnatally depressed mothers. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(8), 927–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nilsen, Alleen Pace. (1971). Women in children’s literature. College English, 32(8), 918–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ladd-Taylor, Molly and Umansky, Laural (Eds.). (1998b). “Bad” Mothers: The Politics of Blame in Twentieth Century America New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Palkovich, Einat N. (2014). Becoming a Reader: Using Cognitive Literary Theory to Examine Children’s and Young Adult’s Fantasy Literature and Reader Response. Diss. University of Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
- Pien, Diana and Rothbart, Mary. (1976). Incongruity and resolution in children’s humor: A reexamination. Child Development, 47(4), 966–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sabbagh, Mark A. and Callanan, Maureen A. (1998). Metarepresentations in action: 3–4, and 5-year-olds developing theories of mind in parent-child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schank, Roger C. (1999). Dynamic Memory Revisited Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sendak, Maurice. (1963). Where the Wild Things Are New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Shultz, Thomas R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(3), 456–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shultz, Thomas R. and Horibe, Frances. (1974). Development of the appreciation of verbal jokes. Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spariosu, Mihai I. (1997). The Wreath of the Wild Olive: Play, Liminality, and the Study of Literature New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Sperry, Linda L. and Sperry, Douglas E. (1996). Early development narrative skills. Cognitive Development, 11, 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stockwell, Peter. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Taylor, Marjorie and Carlson, Stephanie M. (1997). The relation between individual difference in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Development, 68(3), 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wiley, Jeanne. (2000). Rewriting ‘Cinderella’: Envisioning the Empowering Mother-Daughter Romance. In Andrea O’Reilly and Sharon Abbey (Eds.), Mothers and Daughters: Connections, Empowerment and Transformation (pp. 91–102). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar
- Zunshine, Lisa. (2006). Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar